Cases

484 F.Supp.2d 589 (2007) David GALLEGOS, Plaintiff, v. EQUITY TITLE COMPANY OF AMERICA, INC. and Netco, Inc., Defendants. No. CIVASA04CA1093FB, SA-05-CA-795-FB. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, San Antonio Division. March 28, 2007. *590 Richard J. (Rex) Burch, Bruckner Burch PLLC, Houston, for the plaintiff. John

PD-1638-15 PD-1638-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS December 18, 2015 Transmitted 12/17/2015 1:46:31 PM

CRANDALL, Judge. Husband, T.A.H., appeals from the decree of dissolution of his marriage to wife, J.L.H. Wife cross-appeals from the trial court’s dismissal of her tort claims against husband. We affirm the decree of dissolution and dismiss wife’s appeal from the dismissal of her civil action. Husband brought the dissolution action. Wife in turn brought a civil action against husband, raising various clai

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed August 25, 2016. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-15-00329-CR GREGORY LOUIS BRANHAM, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the 239th District Court Brazoria County, Texas Trial Court Cause No.

OPINION OF THE COURT Gonzalez, J. On this appeal, we must decide whether the trial court’s substitution of two alternate jurors in the place of two discharged jurors, after deliberations had commenced and without defendants’ consent, violated defendants’ constitutional and statutory right to a civil trial jury of six persons who deliberate on all matters. Because we find that absent the parties’ consent,

OPINION OF THE COURT Louis B. York, J. This is an order to show cause on a prejudgment motion, pursuant to CPLR 5229, compelling defendants to appear for examinations concerning the nature, extent and location of their assets, and restraining them from making or suffering any sale, assignment, transfer or interference with property in which they have an interest in, as if a restraining notice had been served

110 P.3d 710 (2004) 2004 UT App 322 Anthony and Dawn GALLEGOS, as guardians of Anthony D. RYNES, a minor child; Joyce Dixon; Epifanio Gallegos, individually; and Michael Gallegos, as personal representative of the Estate of Patricia Raquel Gallegos, Plaintiffs and Appellees, v. DICK SIMON TRUCKING, INC.; Ronald D. Purta, individually; and John Does I-V, Defendants and Appellant. No. 20020802-CA.

OPINION OF THE COURT Louis B. York, J. This is a motion to preclude the testimony of plaintiff’s expert witness on the relationship between the plaintiff’s alleged worsening asthma condition and secondhand smoke for a relatively short period of time. Because the court concludes that a substantial portion of the scientific and medical com*224munity

54 Cal.App.4th 252 (1997) THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. GEORGE LLANES GALLEGOS, Defendant and Appellant. Docket No. F025107. Court of Appeals of California, Fifth District. April 15, 1997. *255 COUNSEL Robert Spertus, under appointment by the Court of Appeal, for Defendant and Appellant. Daniel E. Lungren

OPINION CORCORAN, Justice. Michael Steven Gallegos (defendant) was convicted of first degree murder and sexual conduct with a minor under the age of 15. The trial court sentenced him to death for murder and to a presumptive consecutive 20-year sentence for sexual conduct with a minor. This automatic appeal followed. See A.R.S. § 13-4031; rules 26.15, 31.2(b), and 31.15(a)(3), Arizona Rules of Cri

926 F.Supp. 679 (1996) Joseph Ray TERRY, Plaintiff, v. Tony E. GALLEGOS, Chairman of the United States Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Defendant. No. 92-2729-MI/A. United States District Court, W.D. Tennessee. May 16, 1996. *680 *681 *682

This is an appeal by the State of New Mexico from an order sustaining a motion to quash and the dismissal of an indictment. Appellee was indicted by the Grand Jury of Santa Fe County with a violation of Chapter 8, 1939 N.M. Session Laws, 1941 Comp., § 41-3601, which reads as follows: "It shall hereafter be unlawful for any public officer, or deputy of such officer, or any employee in any public capacity of the State of New Mexico or of any county, city, town, village or school district,

ACCEPTED 15-25-00110-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/20/2025 2:50 PM Nos. 15-25-00110-CV; 15-25-00111-CV; 15-25-00112-CV

UNSEALED MEMORANDUM OPINION 1 JAMES 0. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on Defendant J.M. Sharkey’s Motion for Partial Summary Judgment No. I: Dismissal of Plaintiffs’ Fourth Amendment Illegal Seizure Claim (Count I) Based on Qualified Immunity, filed July 30, 2013 (Doc. 92) (“MSJ No. 1”). The Court held a hearing on Septemb

62 S.W.3d 633 (2001) MANSION HILLS CONDOMINIUM ASSOCIATION, Appellant, v. AMERICAN FAMILY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, Respondent. No. ED 79521. Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, Division Three. December 4, 2001. *635 Dean R. Gallego, Wilke & Wilke, P.C., St. Louis, MO, for appellant. Robert J. Wulff, Amelung,

142 F.3d 1093 32 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 688 In re FAIRFIELD COMMUNITIES, INC., Debtor.FAIRFIELD COMMUNITIES, INC., Debtor-Appellant,v.Phyllis G. DALESKE; Marie L. Eschenbach; Robert E.Fiedler; Shirley M. Fiedler; Charles B. West; Doris J.West; D. White, and Company Incorporated; Joan L. White,doing business as D.A. White Enterprises; William M. Storm;Bernice Storm; James Skrien; Liesel Skrie

LOUIS B. BUTLER, JR., J. ¶ 120. (concurring). I join the decision and mandate of the court. While I share many of the concerns stated by Chief Justice Abrahamson in her concurring opinion, and join Part I of that opinion, I conclude that we should proceed with caution in light of the new rule we have adopted. By requiring electronic recording of custodial interrogations for juveniles in future cases where feasible, including w

"None of the taxes levied by this act shall be construed toapply to sales made to the government of the United States or anyagency or instrumentality thereof, except a corporate agency or corporate instrumentality, nor to sales to the state of New Mexico or any of its political subdivisions; provided thatdepsoits of gold and silver with the United States' mint shallnot be considered as sales to the government of the United Statesand sh

HANSEN, Circuit Judge. Anthony M. Dixon, George J.L. Barton, and Freddie C. Russell appeal district court orders denying their motions for ha-beas corpus relief pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. In each case, the district court found that the claims the petitioner raised were barred because the petitioner had not pursued them by seeking discretionary review before the state’s highes

531 P.2d 1222 (1975) 87 N.M. 249 SENTRY INSURANCE COMPANY and Lewis Brake & Clutch, Inc., Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. Johnny L. GALLEGOS and R.F. Apodaca, Superintendent of Insurance of the State of New Mexico, Defendants-Appellees. No. 1555. Court of Appeals of New Mexico. January 8, 1975. Certiorari Denied February 11, 1975.