Cases

WINDOM, Presiding Judge. Taurus Jermaine Carroll appeals his two capital-murder convictions and sentences of death. Carroll was convicted of one count of murder made capital for intentionally taking the life of Michael Turner after having been convicted of another murder within the preceding 20 years, see § 13A-5-40(a)(13), Ala.Code 1975, and a second count of murder made capital for intentionally taking the life of

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER J. PAUL OETKEN, District Judge: This case arises from scandal in the elite world of New York’s fine art galleries. Plaintiff Earl Davis entrusted artworks produced by his father, the influential American modernist painter Stuart Davis, to Salander O’Reilly Galleries (“SOG”). Unbeknownst to Davis, SOG was caught in a vast web of unethical and illegal dealings that ultimately resu

706 S.E.2d 449 (2011) LOWE v. The STATE. No. S10A2033. Supreme Court of Georgia. February 28, 2011. *450 Anne C. Carroll, Thomson, for appellant. Dennis C. Sanders, District Attorney, Durwood Reaves Davis, Assistant District Attorney, Thurbert E. Baker, Attorney General, zPaula K. Smith, Senior Assistant Attorney General,

759 F.Supp.2d 1064 (2010) Ralph REEDER, M.D., Plaintiff, v. Thomas CARROLL, M.D., Defendant. No. 09-CV-4013-LRR. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Western Division. December 21, 2010. *1067 Charles T. Patterson, Patterson & Prahl, L.L.P., Custer, SD, Jeffrey C. Clark, Julie Ann Sullivan, McGuire Woods, LLP, Chicago, IL

BURKE, Chief Justice. [11] Appellant, Michael Carroll, II, challenges his convictions on two counts of first-degree sexual abuse of a minor and one count of second-degree sexual abuse of a minor. He claims that the district court erred in several evidentiary rulings, and asserts that the prosecutor engaged in misconduct. We find no merit in his claims, and affirm.

446 F.Supp.2d 29 (2006) Stephanie ZADES, Plaintiff v. LOWE'S HOME CENTERS, INC., Defendant. Civil Action No. 03-30269-MAP. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. September 6, 2006. *30 Michael O. Shea, Law Office of Michael O. Shea, Wilbraham, MA, for Plaintiff. Stephanie D. Sarantopoulos, Littler Mendelson, PC, M

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 450 On March 9, 2005, David Carroll sued his former' employer, LJC Defense Contracting, Inc. ("LJC"), and Laura Johnston Clark, its president and sole shareholder, alleging breach-of-contract, quantum meruit, unjust-enrichment, and promissory-fraud claims and seeking an accounting. On May 2, 2005, LJC and Clark

FARLEY, Judge: This is an appeal from a March 2, 1993, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals (BVA or Board) which declined to reopen the appellant’s claim for service connection for a low back disorder, finding that new and material evidence had not been submitted. This appeal is timely and the Court has jurisdiction pursuant to 38 U.S.C. § 7252(a). For the reasons that follow, the Court will vacate the Board decision and

Jacobs-Cathey Co. v. Cockrum IN THE TENTH COURT OF APPEALS No. 10-96-051-CV JACOBS-CATHEY COMPANY,

PER CURIAM: In this case, we reject the appellant’s urgings to find within the zones of privacy protected by the Constitution the right to be free from public embarrassment or dam-age to reputation. We affirm, The ag ^ from ^ llant>s , . , ’ ,, , , f , . , complaint, show that he was a student at ^ ^ . ’ T. , „ . . _ . , „ Brunswick High School Brunswick, Geor^ during the 1982-1983 school year. In

Riley, C.J. In this automobile products liability action, we review the Court of Appeals reversal of the trial court’s interlocutory denial of plaintiffs motion to strike an affirmative defense pled by defendants, and a motion in limine to preclude the introduction of any evidence concerning plaintiffs failure to use an available seat belt. The issue we consider is limited to the ad

332 S.E.2d 739 (1985) Jack R. LOWE, Ellen B. Lowe, James T. Warren, Mary E. Warren, Sidney T. Amandolia, Margaret B. Amandolia, Clay D. Walker, Janet A. Walker, Eleanor D. Harris, William C. Zint, Jr., and Margaret J. Zint, Petitioners, v. TOWN OF MEBANE, North Carolina, Respondent. No. 8415SC832. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. August 6, 1985.

320 Md. 150 (1990) 577 A.2d 14 CARROLL COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, ASSIGNEE OF BONNIE (REED) (STEM) CLAS v. DAVID T. EDELMANN. No. 165, September Term, 1989. Court of Appeals of Maryland. July 30, 1990. Donna R. Heller, Asst. Atty. Gen., J. Joseph Curran, Jr., Atty. Gen., Baltimore, and Charles W. Thompson, Jr., County Atty., Westmi

SEXTON, Judge. The defendant-appellant, the East Carroll Parish Police Jury, appeals from the judgment of the Sixth Judicial District Court, the Honorable Cliff C. Adams, presiding, rendered in favor of the plaintiff-appellee, David J. Elliott, ordering the East Carroll Parish Police Jury to grant the permit to plaintiff to install culverts in a drainage ditch. This action was commenced by a petition for

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON February 18, 2003 Session JAMES CARROLL, ET AL. v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Direct Appeal from the Claims Commission No. 204193 Randy C. Camp, Commissioner No. W2002-02105-COA-R3-CV - Filed April 3, 2003 This case involves an appeal from a decision of

WISDOM, Circuit Judge: This case raises issues related to hiring, job assignment, training, promotion, compensation, and termination at the Shreveport facilities of the defendant, Sears, Roebuck & Company (“Sears”). The plaintiffs, two black employees of Sears in Shreveport, filed this class action under Title VII, Civil Rights

As I think that the appellant's proof would not support her cross-bill for divorce if the court had jurisdiction, I concur in the affirmance of the decree against her. But my conclusion on the question of jurisdiction differs from that of the majority. On this latter question, I agree that there is logic in the argument that persons who, because they are not residents of the state, are not included under the laws concerning the civil rights and burdens of its residents, must also be outside o

89 Ga. App. 440 (1953) 79 S.E.2d 832 LAMAR ELECTRIC MEMBERSHIP CORPORATION v. CARROLL. 34690. Court of Appeals of Georgia. Decided December 4, 1953. Rehearing Denied December 17, 1953. *448 Carton Mobley, Kennedy & Kennedy, Troutman, Sams, Schroder & Lockerman, for plaintiff

325 U.S. 327 (1945) SINCLAIR & CARROLL CO., INC. v. INTERCHEMICAL CORPORATION. No. 656. Supreme Court of United States. Argued April 5, 1945. Decided May 21, 1945. CERTIORARI TO THE CIRCUIT COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT. Mr. William D. Mitchell, with whom Messrs. Walter H. Free and Mark N. Donohue were on the brief

AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judge. This is a patent suit brought by the Inter-chemical Corporation, assignee of U. S. Patent No. 2,087,190 to Gessler, against Sinclair & Carroll Company, Inc. Claims 3, 10, 11, 12 and 13 are in issue. The District Court held the patent invalid and not infringed as to those claims. The plaintiff, Interchemical Corporation, appeals. We think that the claims are valid and infringed and that the