⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lujan v. D.R. Horton Inc.”

Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2014-09-19 · Published · cited 22× · 445 S.W.3d 443; 2014 Tex. App. LEXIS 10534; 2014 WL 4656625
*445 OPINION YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice. After Appellant, Gerardo Lujan, filed suit for employment discrimination and retaliation, Appellee, Aloriea, moved to enforce a forum-selection clause and dismiss the suit based upon its assertion that a forum-selection clause
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 1999-08-23 · Published · cited 30× · 521 S.E.2d 749; 336 S.C. 658; 1999 S.C. App. LEXIS 132
336 S.C. 658 (1999) 521 S.E.2d 749 LIBERTY BUILDERS, INC., Appellant, v. Barbara C. HORTON, as Personal Representative of the Estate of William Gregory Horton, and Andrew G. Horton, Respondents. Liberty Builders, Inc., Third-Party Plaintiff, v. Triple E. Sales and Surplus, Inc., d/b/a Jefferson Lumber Company, and USCO, Incorporated, Third-Party Defendants. No. 3039.
District Court, District of Columbia · 1991-07-22 · Published · cited 9× · 768 F. Supp. 870; 22 Envtl. L. Rep. (Envtl. Law Inst.) 20473; 33 ERC (BNA) 1777; 1991 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 10003; 1991 WL 138609
768 F.Supp. 870 (1991) NATURAL RESOURCES DEFENSE COUNCIL, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Manuel LUJAN, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior; U.S. Department of the Interior, Defendants. GWICH'IN STEERING COMMITTEE, Plaintiff, v. Manuel LUJAN, Secretary of the U.S. Department of the Interior; U.S. Department of the Interior, Defendants, and Arctic Slope Regional Corporation and Kaktovik Inupiat Corporation, Defendant-Interv
District Court, District of Columbia · 2022-03-23 · Published · cited 0×
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LISMAN MISAEL DE LEON GIRON, et al., Plaintiffs, Case No. 20-cv-1977 (GMH) v. ZEYTUNA, INC., et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER This action has a somewhat complicated procedural history that informs the primary issue
Horton v. Meskillpublic domain
Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1985-01-15 · Published · cited 41× · 195 Conn. 24; 486 A.2d 1099; 1985 Conn. LEXIS 665
Peters, C. J. These appeals are a sequel to Horton v. Meskill, 172 Conn. 615, 648-49, 376 A.2d 359 (1977) (Horton I), in which this court held unconstitutional the then existing statutory financing system for free public elementary and secondary school education in this state. Noting the difficulties of formulating appropriate orders of relief, we agreed in Horton I with the trial court’s decisio
District Court, District of Columbia · 2018-12-13 · Published · cited 4× · 353 F. Supp. 3d 87
GORTON, J. *90Plaintiff Chanmaly Vilaythong ("Vilaythong" or "plaintiff") brings this claim for unpaid wages pursuant to the Massachusetts Wage and Hour Act, M.G.L. c. 149, §§ 148 and 150, against defendants Sterling Software, Inc. ("Sterling"), Syntel, Inc. ("Syntel") and Prapagar Vanjiappan ("Vanjiappan") (collectively "defendants"). The compla
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2022-07-28 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-20-00240-CV ________________ THOMAS M. CLARKE AND ANA M. CLARKE, Appellants V. TETRA TECHNOLOGIES, INC., Appellee _______________________________________
Supreme Court of Colorado · 1982-05-24 · Published · cited 138× · 649 P.2d 1005; 6 Educ. L. Rep. 191; 1982 Colo. LEXIS 611
HODGES, Chief Justice. The trial court declared Colorado’s system of financing public elementary and secondary education unconstitutional. This school finance system is encompassed within the provisions of the Public School Finance Act of 1973, section 22-50-101 et seq., C.R.S.1973 and 1981 Cum.Supp., and is affected by the statutory provisions relating to the capital reserve fund, sections 22-40-102(4) and 22-45-
District Court, D. Kansas · 2013-04-05 · Published · cited 28× · 292 F.R.D. 652; 2013 WL 1397125; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 50667
*659 MEMORANDUM AND ORDER KATHRYN H. VRATIL, District Judge. Plaintiffs in Rushing v. Ambest, Inc., No. 06-7621-PJH (N.D.Cal.), Lerner v. Costco Wholesale Corp., No. 07-1216-GHK-FMO (C.D.Cal.), and Wyatt v. B.P. America Corp., No. 07-1754-BTM-JMA (S.D.Cal.), bring class action claims for damages and injunctive relief ag
Ohio Court of Appeals · 2021-02-04 · Published · cited 3× · 167 N.E.3d 591; 2021 Ohio 309
[Cite as SW Acquisition Co., Inc. v. Akzo Nobel Paints, L.L.C., 2021-Ohio-309.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA SW ACQUISITION CO., INC., : Plaintiff-Appellant, : No. 109236 v.
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2014-07-07 · Published · cited 0× · 30 F. Supp. 3d 587; 2014 WL 3057063; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 91441
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NANCY F. ATLAS, District Judge. This insurance coverage case is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiff The Burlington Insurance Company (“TBIC”) has filed an opposed Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #26] (“TBIC’s Motion”). JCI has also filed an opposed Motion for Partial Summary Judgment [Doc. # 30] (“JCI’s Motion”). These motjons are ripe for co
District Court, S.D. Texas · 2013-01-22 · Published · cited 3× · 919 F. Supp. 2d 832; 21 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 158; 2013 WL 245002; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9104
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER NANCY F. ATLAS, District Judge. This Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”) case is before the Court on De*837fendant BDP International, Inc.’s (“BDP”) Motion for Summary Judgment [Doc. #33] and Defendants BDP, Elite Group, Inc., Elite International -Transportation, Inc., Elite Brokerage Services, Inc.,- and ETS Express,
Texas Court of Appeals, 11th District (Eastland) · 2021-04-23 · Published · cited 0×
Opinion filed April 23, 2021 In The Eleventh Court of Appeals __________ No. 11-19-00048-CV __________ MEI CAMP SPRINGS, LLC, Appellant V. CLEAR FORK, INC. AND GUNN OIL COMPANY, Appellees On Appeal from the 32nd District Court Fishe
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2019-05-23 · Published · cited 1× · 387 F. Supp. 3d 703
SAM SPARKS, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE *706BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Defendant City of Cedar Park (the City)'s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment [#24], Plaintiff Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc. (Reagan)'s Response [#29], Cedar Park's Reply [#30] in
District Court, W.D. Texas · 2018-09-24 · Published · cited 0× · 343 F. Supp. 3d 674
SAM SPARKS, SENIOR UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE BE IT REMEMBERED on this day the Court reviewed the file in the above-styled cause, and specifically Defendant City of Cedar Park (the City)'s Amended Motion for Summary Judgment [# 24], Plaintiff Reagan National Advertising of Austin, Inc. (Reagan)'s Response [# 29], Cedar Park's Reply [# 30] in support, Reagan's Sur-Reply [# 33] in opposition, and Cedar Park's Sur-Sur-Reply [# 35] in
District Court, D. South Dakota · 2005-12-28 · Published · cited 39× · 408 F. Supp. 2d 854; 2005 S.D. 25; 2005 DSD 25; 2005 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 39583; 2005 WL 3577404
408 F.Supp.2d 854 (2005) 2005 DSD 25 KRANTZ, INC., a South Dakota Corporation, d/b/a Krantz Buick Olds Nissan, Inc., and Billion Southtown, Inc., a South Dakota Corporation, Plaintiffs, v. NISSAN NORTH AMERICA, INC., a California Corporation, Defendant. Krantz, Inc., a South Dakota corporation, d/b/a Krantz Buick Olds Nissan, Inc., Plaintiff, v. Nissan North America, Inc., a California Corporation, Defendant.</
District Court, S.D. Florida · 2016-06-01 · Published · cited 3× · 189 F. Supp. 3d 1327; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 179354; 2016 WL 7409712
ORDER URSULA UNGARO, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS CAUSE is before the Court on cross-motions for summary judgment. Plaintiffs People for the Ethical Treatment of Animals (“PETA”), Animal Legal Defense Fund, The Orea Network, and Howard Garrett move for entry of partial summary judgment on the threshold issue of standing. D.E. 131. Defendant Miami Sea-quarium and Festival Fun Parks, LLC, d/b/a Palace
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2016-10-27 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-15-00391-CV H&H STEEL FABRICATORS, INC.; APPELLANTS TOWNCREEK INDUSTRIAL, LLC; AND JAMES TOBEY V. WELLS FARGO EQUIPMENT APPELLEE FINANCE, INC. ---------- FR
District Court, District of Columbia · 2013-03-18 · Published · cited 1× · 930 F. Supp. 2d 154; 2013 WL 1097792; 2013 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 36729
MEMORANDUM OPINION ROBERT L. WILKINS, District Judge. Plaintiff Libertarian National Committee, Inc. (“LNC”) has been left a bequest that it is unable to take in one lump sum payment because Defendant Federal Election Commission (“FEC”) believes that, due to the large amount of the bequest, to do so would violate the Federal Election Campaig
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2022-01-13 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ________________ NO. 09-19-00375-CV ________________ ACE REAL PROPERTY INVESTMENTS, LP AND FORMOSA PROPERTY MANAGEMENT COMPANY, INC., Appellants V. CEDAR KNOB INVESTMENTS, LLC, ET AL, A