Cases

In the Missouri Court of Appeals Eastern District DIVISION FOUR BG OLIVE & GRAESER, LLC, AND ) ED109879 FORSYTH INVESTMENTS, LLC, ) ) Appeal from the Circuit Court of Respondents, ) St. Louis County ) 20SL-CC04674 v.

OPINION AND ORDER WILLIAM E. SMITH, Chief Judge. In this bewildering ballad of bungled bangle banditry, Plaintiff Alex and Ani, LLC (“Alex and Ani”), a purveyor of “positive-energy jewelry,” has brought a 14 count Amended Complaint against numerous defendants: Elite Level Consulting (“ELC”), Travis Brody (“Brody”), J. Jonathan Weiss (“Weiss”), Luxury Business Jets, LLC (“Jets”), Roxy, Inc. (“Ro

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

OPINION DUFFY, District Judge: In this diversity action, Plaintiff-Appellant Cynthia Lawler (“Lawler”) appeals the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of Defendants-Appellees Montblanc North America, LLC (“Mont-blanc”) and its President and Chief Executive Officer Jan-Patrick Schmitz (“Schmitz”) (collectively, “Defendants”), on each of her

421 B.R. 221 (2009) In re BELK PROPERTIES, LLC, Debtor. No. 09-14656-DWH. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Mississippi. December 23, 2009. Joyce Freeland, Oxford, MS, for Debtor. OPINION DAVID W. HOUSTON, III, Bankruptcy Judge. On consideration before the court is a motion for an order authorizing post-petition financing pursuant to

OPINION Rebeca Huddle, Justice iPic-Gold Class Entertainment, LLC and iPic Texas, LLC (iPic), a boutique upscale movie theater chain, sued Regal Entertainment Group and AMC, two large theater chains, for alleged violations of Texas antitrust law. iPic alleges that Regal violated the Texas Free Enterprise and Antitrust Act by requesting from major film di

*272 EISMANN, Justice. This is an appeal out of Ada County from an order granting a judgment notwithstanding the verdict in a commercial lawsuit in which the jury found in favor of the defendant. We reverse the order and remand this case for consideration of

507 F.3d 252 (2007) LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER S.A., Plaintiff-Appellant, v. HAUTE DIGGITY DOG, LLC; Victoria D.N. Dauernheim; Woofies, LLC, d/b/a Woofie's Pet Boutique, Defendant-Appellees.*253 International Trademark Association, Amicus Supporting Appellant. No. 06-2267. United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit. Argued: September 26

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 20-0014 ══════════ AMC Entertainment Holdings, Inc., AMC Entertainment, Inc., and American Multi-Cinema, Inc., Petitioners, v. iPic-Gold Class Entertainment, LLC and iPic Texas, LLC, Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════

JULIE A. ROBINSON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff Swimwear Solution, Inc. ("Swimwear") filed this action against Defendant Orlando Bathing Suit, LCC, d/b/a Everything But Water ("EBW"), in the District Court of Johnson County, Kansas on November 6, 2017, bringing claims for breach of contract (Count I), tortious interference with existing, exclusive supplier contracts (Count II), tortious interference with existing emp

Salans LLP v VBH Props. S.R.L. (2019 NY Slip Op 02611) Salans LLP v VBH Props. S.R.L. 2019 NY Slip Op 02611 Decided on April 4, 2019 Appellate Division, First Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau

Opinion by JUDGE GRAHAM ¶ 1 In this case interpreting provisions of the Colorado Common Interest Ownership Act (CCIOA), sections 38-33.3-101 to -402, C.R.S. 2015, we are asked to determine, among other related issues, whether a mixed-use community consisting of a hotel, retail shops, restaurants, and sixty-six condominiums is a “small planned community” und

*********************************************** The “officially released” date that appears near the be- ginning of each opinion is the date the opinion will be pub- lished in the Connecticut Law Journal or the date it was released as a slip opinion. The operative date for the be- ginning of all time periods for filing postopinion motions and petitions for certification is the “officially released” date appearing in the opinion. All opinions are subject to modification and technical corr

OPINION OF THE COURT JORDAN, Circuit Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS Page I. Background..............................................................429 A. Background of the HRTC Statute........................

464 F.Supp.2d 495 (2006) LOUIS VUITTON MALLETIER S.A., Plaintiff, v. HAUTE DIGGITY DOG, LLC, Victoria D.N. Dauernheim, and Woofies, LLC, Defendants. No. 1:06cv321(JCC). United States District Court, E.D. Virginia, Alexandria Division. November 3, 2006. *496 *497 Savalle Charlesia Sims, Arent F

Rel: March 7, 2025 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. ALABAMA COURT OF CIVIL APPEALS OCTOBER TERM,

LIPEZ, Circuit Judge. This trademark infringement case is a dispute between two hotels over the right to use the mark “Meliá” in Puerto Rico. Defendant-appellant Hotel Meliá, Inc. (“HMI”) has operated the Hotel Meliá in Ponce, Puerto Rico for more than a century, but has never registered that mark with the United States Patent and Trademark Office (“USPTO”). Plaintiff-appellee Dor

Original Decision Mailed: Redesignation: January 19, 2022 March 29, 2022 UNITED STATES PATENT AND TRADEMARK OFFICE _____ Trademark Trial and Appeal Board _____ In re Jasmin Larian, LLC _____

418 F.Supp.2d 305 (2005) LE BOOK PUBLISHING, INC., Plaintiff, v. BLACK BOOK PHOTOGRAPHY, INC. and Dag Media, Inc. Defendants. No. 04 Civ. 10270(GEL). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 16, 2005. *306 Daniela Alba, Dowd & Marotta LLC, New York City, for Plaintiff. Mark Heinze, Ofeck & Heinze, LLP, N

283 F.Supp.2d 963 (2003) THE ECHO DESIGN GROUP, INC. Plaintiff, v. ZINO DAVIDOFF S.A., Davidoff & Cie S.A., Davidoff of Geneva (N.Y.), Inc., Coty Inc. and Lancaster Group U.S. LLC. Defendants. No. 03 Civ. 6739(VM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. September 22, 2003. *964 Kenneth I. Schacter, Timothy John Stephens