Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Lydia Cora”
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00486-CV G. L. Vinson/Charles M. Black, Jr.; Kenneth Bramblett; Jane Bramblett; Mural Cook; Lynne Cook; Travis Duncan; Lydia Taylor McBride; Betty Melcher; Harold J. Nelson; Nikki Perrotta; Janet R. Rader; Anne Marie St. Martin; Jerome Urbanek; Theresa Wilson; John S. Avery; Judy Avery; Darin Digby; Barbara Digby; Jan
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-01-00486-CV G. L. Vinson/Charles M. Black, Jr.; Kenneth Bramblett; Jane Bramblett; Mural Cook;
Lilly Lyd, L.L.C. v. Grahampublic domain
SUSAN M. CHEHARDY, Chief Judge. laThis appeal stems from a suit on a promissory note arising out of a loan transaction between appellant, Lilly Lyd, L.L.C., and appellee, Cora Joyce Graham. For the reasons that follow, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Appellee, Cora Joyce Graham, and her husband, Robert Mullins, who was deceased at the time of t
Halford v. Wrightpublic domain
PER CURIAM. For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion by Judge Greene, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed and the case is remanded to the Court of Appeals for further remand to the Superior Court, Rutherford County, for proceedings not inconsistent with the dissenting opinion. REVERSED AND REMANDED.
Travelers Insurance Company v. Johnsonpublic domain
544 P.2d 294 (1975) 97 Idaho 336 The TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Viola Lydia JOHNSON, Defendant, Cross-Complainant, Cross-Defendant-Appellant, v. Cora HATCH, Defendant, Cross-Defendant, Cross-Complainant and Respondent. No. 11797. Supreme Court of Idaho. December 29, 1975. Rehearing Denied January 29, 19
Cbc Holdings, LLC v. Dynatec Corp., USApublic domain
680 S.E.2d 40 (2009) CBC HOLDINGS, LLC, a West Virginia Limited Liability Company, in its Own Behalf and in Behalf of Other Owners of Undivided Interests in the Minerals Underlying the Realty in Question, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants v. DYNATEC CORPORATION, USA, a Foreign Corporation Not Licensed to Do Business in West Virginia; Dynatec Energy, Inc., a Foreign Corporation Licensed to Do Business in West Virginia; Dynatec Drilling, Inc., a Foreign
in Re Nettie Bivenspublic domain
NUMBER 13-20-00563-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN RE NETTIE BIVENS, ET AL. On Petition for Writ of Injunction. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Benavides, Longoria, and Tijerina Memorandum Opinion
Vinson v. Brownpublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 223 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 224 The dispute in this case involves various property owners' easement rights to a park that fronts on Lake Travis. G. L. Vi
564 F.2d 304 Eugene MONROE, Leslie Williams, Tim Richards, Wilson Ashby,Susie Hunnicutt, Franklin Harris, Henry Harris, Sr., JohnnySnyder, Daniel Thomas, Jr., Charlie Kiana, Mahlon Mills,Levi A. Mills, Sr., Jenny Sours, Eugene Sours, Joe Harris,Lydia Harris, L. Kasrie, Fredrick Driggs, Abraham Howarth,Edna Outwater, Clara Sampson, Wilfred Lane, Vivian Lane,Charlie Clark, Ingram Melton, William Jones, DouglasSheldon, Sr.,
Smith, Et Ux. v. Lemp, Et Ux.public domain
The contract which the plaintiffs seek to compel the defendants to perform is dated *Page 2 January thirty-first, 1948, and provides for the conveyance by the plaintiffs to the defendants of "a good and marketable title" to certain property at Willow Grove, in North Murderkill Hundred, Kent County, Delaware, said to contain about one acre of land, more or less. The sole question is whether the plaintiffs can convey more than an undivided three-fourths int
In Re Sun Life Assur. Co. of Canadapublic domain
Sylar Robinson, at his death, left a policy of life insurance in which he named as beneficiary Cora Taylor and Alice Robinson. Originally, his lawful wife, Lydia Robinson, had been named as beneficiary. Later he had named, as additional beneficiary, an illegitimate daughter, Alice Robinson, and still later he had eliminated Lydia Robinson, the wife, as a beneficiary, and had substituted in her place Cora Taylor, his concubine, with whom he had been living in open adultery. His wife, Ly
Aschenbach v. Covenant Living Centers-North, Inc.public domain
482 F.Supp. 1241 (1980) Dorothy ASCHENBACH; Perey Bamford and Letitia Bamford, his wife; Hazel Bartelt; Janet H. Becker; Joseph Belohlavek and Milada Belohlavek, his wife; Edward Berens and Margaret Berens, his wife; Alice Bergin; John Binkley and Marie Binkley, his wife; Paul Brand and Mabel Brand, his wife; Ray Burger; Neil Butler and Anita Butler, his wife; Lura Carrithers; Ethel Cleereman; Elva Conley; Alice Day; Herman De Elsa; Euclid De Mers and El
Lock v. Lesliepublic domain
Mr.. Justice Jones delivered the opinion of the court. Defendant in error, Julius F. Solomon, obtained a judgment by confession against plaintiffs in error, Cora Esta Boyd and Lewis W. Boyd, in the circuit court of LaSalle county for $7,675.49. A partition suit to which the Boyds were parties was later instituted in the circuit court of that county. The decree, in th
Walter v. Altpublic domain
Action to contest the will of John Alt, deceased, on the ground of testamentary incapacity and undue influence. At the close of all the evidence the court directed a verdict sustaining the will. Judgment was entered on the verdict and contestants have appealed. *Page 59 Error is assigned upon the exclusion of evidence and upon the court's failure to submit the cause to the jury. A statement of facts is necessary and a fair statement required an ext
Kolterman v. Atkinsonpublic domain
The opinion of the court was delivered by Smith, J.: This was an action to partition real estate in the first cause of action and for an accounting in the second cause of action. Judgment was for the plaintiff, decreeing a partition.. One of the defendants appeals. The plaintiff, Laura Kolterman, was -a daughter of George W. Forrester. The defendants and intervener are other heirs of George W
In Re Estate of Wickershampublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 605 This is an appeal from a judgment declaring the appellants estopped from asserting any interest in the estate of the deceased, adjudging that they are not interested in said estate, and dismissing their petitions to revoke the probate of the will of said deceased. Lydia C. Wickersham died on February 10, 19
509 F.Supp. 981 (1981) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. 243.538 ACRES OF LAND, MORE OR LESS, IN the COUNTY OF MAUI, STATE OF HAWAII; the Nature Conservancy et al., and Unknown Owners, Defendants. Civ. No. 78-0359. United States District Court, D. Hawaii. March 9, 1981. *982 *983
103 B.R. 578 (1989) In re Louis FLEET, Debtor. Louis FLEET, Sarah Morrison and Philadelphia Unemployment Project on Behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES CONSUMER COUNCIL, INC., Jack Rhode, Betty Rosi and Deborah Tavares, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 81-04969S, Misc. No. 89-283, Adv. No. 83-0880S. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania.<
Engen v. Kincannonpublic domain
79 N.W.2d 160 (1956) Otto ENGEN, Plaintiff, Appellant and Cross Respondent, v. Millard KINCANNON, Mountrail County, a Municipal Corporation, Theadore L. Kincannon, L. R. Baird, as Receiver of the Citizens State Bank of Tagus, North Dakota, F. L. Stangl, Hannah L. Cline, L. M. Rutten, Frank J. Bach, as representative of the Estate of Hannah L. Cline, Deceased, and Executor of the Estate of Hannah L. Cline, Deceased, Anna L. Kincannon, C. M. Tollef
J. BLAINE ANDERSON, Circuit Judge: Appellants are Native Eskimos who seek title to land presently held by appellee, a Quaker organization which established a mission in Kotzebue, Alaska in 1897. In 1941, pursuant to 48 U.S.C. § 356 (now found at 25 U.S.C, § 280a), appellee obtained a patent to the land now disputed. Appellants contend the statute created a trust for their benefit.1 The district c