⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Lynda M Jordan”

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2023-07-26 · Published · cited 4× · 192 N.Y.S.3d 684; 218 A.D.3d 769; 2023 NY Slip Op 03916
Matter of Vicki M. A. (Lynda P.--Lisa P.) (2023 NY Slip Op 03916) Matter of Vicki M. A. (Lynda P.--Lisa P.) 2023 NY Slip Op 03916 Decided on July 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Burea
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2017-09-21 · Published · cited 129× · 871 F.3d 1203; 42 I.E.R. Cas. (BNA) 412; 2017 WL 4173625; 2017 U.S. App. LEXIS 18276
JORDAN, Circuit Judge, concurring. In my view, the constitutional right to freedom of intimate association, whether seen as a pure or hybrid First Amendment right, see Roberts v. United States Jaycees, 468 U.S. 609, 618-20, 104 S.Ct. 3244, 82 L.Ed.2d 462 (1984), protects a public employee from adverse treatment based on the speech of a close relative or family member. See Adler v. Pa
People v. Jordanpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2015-03-16 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 3/16/15 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* COURT OF APPEAL, FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT DIVISION ONE STATE OF CALIFORNIA THE PEOPLE, D064010 Plaintiff and Respondent, v. (Super. Ct. No. SCD234048) SHAQUILLE KASIYA JORDAN et al., Defendants and Appellants. APPEAL f
Court of Appeals of Mississippi · 2020-08-25 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CA-01109-COA PARISH TRANSPORT LLC AND ERIC PARISH APPELLANTS/ CROSS-APPELLEES v. JORDAN CARRIERS INC. APPELLEE/ CROSS-APPELLANT DATE OF JUDGMENT:
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2019-08-08 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-18-00494-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN THE INTEREST OF J.A.M. AND J.M., CHILDREN On appeal from the 214th District Court of Nueces County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Justices Bena
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2021-08-05 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CT-01109-SCT PARISH TRANSPORT LLC AND ERIC PARISH v. JORDAN CARRIERS INC. ON WRIT OF CERTIORARI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/06/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. DEBRA W. BLACKWELL TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: GRAYSON R. LEWIS PATRICK H. ZACHARY
Mississippi Supreme Court · 2009-03-19 · Published · cited 1× · 5 So. 3d 393; 2009 Miss. LEXIS 123; 2009 WL 707473
GRAVES, Presiding Justice, for the Court. ¶ 1. This is a case regarding the treatment of a resident at the Dixie White House Nursing Home (Dixie White House) in Harrison County, Mississippi. Following the resident’s death, the plaintiff sued the defendants for allegedly mistreating the resident and causing him to suffer injury and death. The Circuit Court of Harrison County granted summary judgment to the def
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2015-02-05 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-14-00457-CV ____________________ IN THE INTEREST OF Z.L.M. __________________________________________________________________ On Appeal from the 279th District Court Jeffers
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2004-01-06 · Published · cited 255× · 350 F.3d 1061
350 F.3d 1061 Lynda STEGALL, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.CITADEL BROADCASTING COMPANY; Citadel Communications Corporation; Marathon Media LP, Defendants-Appellees. No. 02-35399. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. Argued and Submitted June 2, 2003. — Seattle, Washington. Decided December 2, 2003. As Amended J
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 2012-05-31 · Published · cited 143× · 681 F.3d 170; 2012 WL 1948970
681 F.3d 170 (2012) John M. DEWEY; Patrick DeMartino; Patricia Romeo; Lynda Gallo; Ronald B. Marrans; Edward O. Griffin, on behalf of themselves and all others similarly situated v. VOLKSWAGEN AKTIENGESELLSCHAFT; Volkswagen Beteiligungs Gesellschaft M.B.H.; Volkswagen Group of America, Inc. (formerly known as Volkswagen of America, Inc.); Audi AG; Volkswagen Group of *171 America, Inc., d/b/a Audi of America,
Court of Appeals of Arizona · 2014-11-18 · Published · cited 3× · 236 Ariz. 217; 338 P.3d 324; 700 Ariz. Adv. Rep. 24; 2014 Ariz. App. LEXIS 219
OPINION DOWNIE, Judge. ¶ 1 Appellants are parents of children who attend charter schools in Aizona. They contend the statutory framework for financing charter schools violates the equal protection and general and uniform clauses of the state constitution. For the following reasons, we affirm the superior court’s grant of summary judgment against Appellants
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 1999-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 81 F. Supp. 2d 681; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 20786; 82 Fair Empl. Prac. Cas. (BNA) 415; 1999 WL 1426104
81 F.Supp.2d 681 (1999) John PATTERSON, Felicia Berry and Jerry Robinson, Plaintiffs, v. RED LOBSTER aka GMRI, Inc., Defendant. No. 3:99CV155LN. United States District Court, S.D. Mississippi, Jackson Division. October 6, 1999. *682 Lynda Carol Robinson, Robinson Law Firm, P.A., Jackson, MS, Ermea J. Russell, Equal Employment Opp
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016-08-03 · Published · cited 6× · 142 A.D.3d 505; 35 N.Y.S.3d 726
Appeal from an order of the Family Court, Orange County (Lori Currier Woods, J.), dated February 4, 2015. The order dismissed, without a hearing, the maternal grandmother’s petition pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 for visitation with the subject child. Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, the maternal grandmother’s petition for visitation wi
B.S. v. B.T.public domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-03-22 · Published · cited 0× · 148 A.D.3d 1029; 49 N.Y.S.3d 732
Appeal by the mother from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (IDV Part) (Esther M. Morgenstern, J.), dated February 26, 2015. The order, after a hearing, granted the petition of the grandmother and stepgrandfather pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 for visitation with the subject child. Ordered that the order is modified, on the law and the facts, (1) by deleting the provision thereof granting the petition insofar as assert
B.S. v. B.T.public domain
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-03-22 · Published · cited 5× · 148 A.D.3d 1029; 49 N.Y.S.3d 732
Appeal by the mother from an order of the Supreme Court, Kings County (IDV Part) (Esther M. Morgenstern, J.), dated February 26, 2015. The order, after a hearing, granted the petition of the grandmother and stepgrandfather pursuant to Family Court Act article 6 for visitation with the subject child. Ordered that the order is modified, on the law and the facts, (1) by deleting the provision thereof granting the petition insofar as assert
People v. Pridepublic domain
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2019-01-10 · Published · cited 1× · 242 Cal. Rptr. 3d 297; 31 Cal. App. 5th 133
McCONNELL, P. J. INTRODUCTION *135A jury convicted Chaz Nasjhee Pride of robbery ( Pen. Code, § 211 ; count 1)1 and found true allegations he committed the robbery for the benefit of, or at the direction of, and in association with a criminal street gang (§ 186.22, subd. (b)(1) ).2
Texas Court of Appeals, 13th District · 2019-12-12 · Published · cited 0×
NUMBER 13-18-00389-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF TEXAS, Appellant, v. SERVANDO RIVERA AND MARIA MENDOZA, Appellees. On appeal from the 389th Distric
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-03-22 · Published · cited 0× · 2017 NY Slip Op 2044
Matter of B.S. (B.T.) (2017 NY Slip Op 02044) Matter of B.S. (B.T.) 2017 NY Slip Op 02044 Decided on March 22, 2017 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judi
District Court, D. Oregon · 2001-08-20 · Published · cited 3× · 155 F. Supp. 2d 1213; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13481; 2001 WL 946869
155 F.Supp.2d 1213 (2001) Leslie PITCHFORD, on behalf of their child, M.; et al., Plaintiffs, v. SALEM-KEIZER SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 24J, Defendant. Civil No. 00-629-JO. United States District Court, D. Oregon. August 20, 2001. *1214 *1215 Steven N. Bogdon, Blair, Schaefer, Hutchison & Wolfe,
State v. Stewartpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2009-05-26 · Published · cited 8× · 15 So. 3d 276; 8 La.App. 5 Cir. 1265; 2009 La. App. LEXIS 985; 2009 WL 1464137
15 So.3d 276 (2009) STATE of Louisiana v. David J. STEWART. No. 08-KA-1265. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, Fifth Circuit. May 26, 2009. *278 Paul D. Connick, Jr., District Attorney, Twenty-Fourth Judicial District, Parish of Jefferson, Terry M. Boudreaux, Juliet Clark-Appellate Counsel, Assistant District Attorneys, Gretna, Louisi