Cases

Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed November 18, 2020. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D19-2405 Lower Tribunal No. 10-61928 ________________ Mack Wells, Appel

Carhart, J. In this mortgage foreclosure action, the plaintiff alleges that Harmon Law Offices, P.C. (Harmon), as counsel for mortgagor Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. (Wells Fargo), and Commonwealth Auction Associates, Inc. (Commonwealth), violated G. L. c. 93A, §§ 2 and 9, and the Massachusetts Civil Rights Act, G. L. *66

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a) ("After service of the initial brief in appeals under rule 9.110, 9.130, or 9.140, ... the court may summarily affirm the order to be reviewed if the court finds that no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated."); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee,

Moriarty, Cornelius J., J. This action involves the Home Affordable Modification Program (“HAMP”), a government program that promotes modification of residential mortgage loans to avoid foreclosure. The plaintiff, Devenia Mack (“Mack”), brings a putative class action on behalf of herself and other similarly situated residential mortgagors of Wells Fargo in Massachusetts for damages, declaratory judgment, and injunctive relief agai

Wilkins, Douglas H., J. Still in the pleadings stage, this case has already been the subject of significant motion practice and resulting decisions regarding the scope, removability and adequacy of the allegations of the First Amended Complaint against defendants Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Mortgage Electronic Registration Systems, Inc. and Merscorp (“the Lender Defendants”). See Mack v. Wells Fargo Bank, 29 Mass. L. Rptr.

PER CURIAM. Affirmed. See Fla. R. App. P. 9.315(a) ("After service of the initial brief in appeals under rule 9.110, 9.130, or 9.140, ... the court may summarily affirm the order to be reviewed if the court finds that no preliminary basis for reversal has been demonstrated."); Applegate v. Barnett Bank of Tallahassee,

Affirmed.

PER CURIAM. WELLS, Judge. We dismiss the instant appeal as it is moot. On August 6, 2014, the trial court entered an order denying defendant’s motion for additional credit for time served. On September 5, 2014,- Defendant filed his *244notice of appeal of the August 6th order. However, on August 19, between the entry of the August 6th order and the

ROTHENBERG, J. Christopher S. Mack (“Christopher”), Charles T. Mack (“Chuck”), and Kathleen Mack (“Kathleen”) (collectively, “Plaintiffs”) appeal from a final order dismissing their three count complaint filed against *1170their sister, M. Maureen Polsby, M.D. (“Dr.Polsby”). We reverse. This appeal involves a dispute between four adult siblings

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James B. Zagel, United States District Judge Plaintiff Johnny Edwards brought this action against Defendants Mack Trucks, Inc. (“Mack Trucks”) and M & K Quality Truck Sales of Summit, LLC d/b/a Chicago Mack, Center, Inc. (“Chicago Mack”). Plaintiff alleges breach of express warranty (Count I) and revocation of acceptance and cancellation of contract (Count II) ag

06/20/2018 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 16, 2018 ANGELA MICHELLE NEWBERRY v. JEREMY MACK NEWBERRY Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hamilton County No. 07D262 W. Neil Thomas, III, Judge No. E2017-00340-COA-R3-CV In this

PER CURIAM. By petition for writ of certiorari, Rodney T. Mack seeks review of the circuit court’s denial of his petition for writ of mandamus. In 1993, Mack pled guilty to burglary of a dwelling and was sentenced to twelve years in prison to be followed by three years of probation. He was released from prison to begin service of his probationary term in 1998, but was returned to prison in 2000, after violating his probati

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER GREGG COSTA, District Judge. The real estate at issue in this proposed class action is part of an 800-acre development along the mid-Gulf Coast of Texas. But the allegations of fraud reach back to decisions made in Washington and Wall Street during the height of the financial crisis in the fall of 2008. In the spasm of bank merger activity that occurred during that period, whe

Unable to extract the content from this file. Please try reading the original.

138 P.3d 525 (2006) Colleen MACK-MANLEY, Appellant, v. Edward T. MANLEY, Respondent. Colleen Mack, Appellant, v. Edward T. Manley, Respondent. Nos. 39160, 42003. Supreme Court of Nevada. July 20, 2006. Rehearing Denied September 26, 2006. *527 James S. Kent, Henderson, for Appellant. Kirby R. W

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 95-DP-01068-SCT MACK C. WELLS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 9-28-95 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARCUS D. GORDON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: SCOTT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ROBERT N. BROOKS ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: OFFICE OF THE ATTORNEY GENERAL

Unable to extract the content from this file. Please try reading the original.

Unable to extract the content from this file. Please try reading the original.

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 1998-DR-01280-SCT MACK C. WELLS v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 09/28/1995 DATE PCR FILED: 09/03/1998 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. MARCUS D. GORDON COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: SCOTT COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: OFFICE OF CAPITAL POST-CONVICTION

Unable to extract the content from this file. Please try reading the original.