Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “MACK v. PROGRESSIVE CORPORATION”
Mack v. Harris Chevroletpublic domain
In re Mack, Marsha; — Plaintiff(s); applying for writ of certiorari and/or review; Parish of Tangipahoa, 21st Judicial District Court, Div. “E”, No. 9001438; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CA95 0609. Denied. WATSON, JOHNSON, and BLEICH, JJ„ would grant the writ. CALOGERO, C.J., not on panel.
Mack v. Harris Chevroletpublic domain
ON REHEARING laWATKINS, Judge. We granted rehearing in the instant case to consider statutory provisions that we previously failed to consider. Having determined that the overlooked provisions are controlling, we vacate our previous opinion, and we reverse the judgment for plaintiff rendered by the trial court. The facts are stated in our previous opinion, Mack v. Harris Ch
Paul Westcott v. MacK Molding, Co., Inc.public domain
NOTICE: This opinion is subject to motions for reargument under V.R.A.P. 40 as well as formal revision before publication in the Vermont Reports. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions by email at: Reporter@vtcourts.gov or by mail at: Vermont Supreme Court, 109 State Street, Montpelier, Vermont 05609-0801, of any errors in order that corrections may be made before this opinion goes to press. 2024 VT 85
Leroy Mack v. USAA Casualty Insurance Companypublic domain
USCA11 Case: 19-14958 Date Filed: 04/22/2021 Page: 1 of 13 [PUBLISH] IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT ________________________ No. 19-14958 ________________________ D.C. Docket No. 0:19-cv-61366-MGC LEROY MACK,
If this opinion indicates that it is “FOR PUBLICATION,” it is subject to revision until final publication in the Michigan Appeals Reports. STATE OF MICHIGAN COURT OF APPEALS C-SPINE ORTHOPEDICS, PLLC, FOR PUBLICATION December 8, 2022 Plaintiff-Appellant, 9:1
FILED Mar 04 2025, 8:48 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals and
Rel: December 20, 2024 Notice: This opinion is subject to formal revision before publication in the advance sheets of Southern Reporter. Readers are requested to notify the Reporter of Decisions, Alabama Appellate Courts, 300 Dexter Avenue, Montgomery, Alabama 36104-3741 ((334) 229-0650), of any typographical or other errors, in order that corrections may be made before the opinion is published in Southern Reporter. Alabama Court of Criminal Appeals
MacK v. Wileypublic domain
991 So.2d 479 (2008) Clinton MACK and Effie Mack v. Dorothy WILEY and American National Property and Casualty Company. No. 2007 CA 2344. Court of Appeal of Louisiana, First Circuit. May 2, 2008. *483 Vincent L. Bowers, New Orleans, LA, for Plaintiffs-Appellants, Clinton and Effie Mack. Arthur H. Andrews, Baton Rouge, LA, f
ORDER LEONARD T. STRAND, United States Magistrate Judge. INTRODUCTION This ease is before me on two motions filed by defendant Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation, as Receiver of Vantus Bank (FDIC-R): (1) a motion (Doc. No. 72) to compel plaintiff Progressive Casualty Insurance Company (Progressive) to comply with the court’s March 10, 2014, order and (2) a motion (Doc. No
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S AUGUST 22, 2014, DISCOVERY RULING MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS J. INTRODUCTION........................................................548 II.LEGAL ANALYSIS......................................................548 A. Standard Of Review..
Progressive Casualty Insurance Co. v. Moorepublic domain
Opinion by Judge RUSSELL. T 1 In this declaratory judgment action, S. Bryan Moore appeals the judgment entered in favor of Progressive Casualty Insurance Company. We affirm. I. Background T2 Moore was involved in a car accident. When he sought insurance benefits from Progressive, he was told that his automobile insurance policy had expired months earlier.
Austin v. Progressive RSC, Inc.public domain
510 F.Supp.2d 855 (2007) Monticello AUSTIN, Plaintiff, v. PROGRESSIVE RSC, INC., Defendant. No. 8:06-cv-273-T-24MAP. United States District Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. April 26, 2007. *856 Robert F. McKee, Melissa Christine Mihok, Kelly & McKee, P.A., Tampa, FL, for Plaintiff. *85
Reversed and Rendered and Memorandum Opinion filed January 14, 2020. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00483-CV JEFF FISHER, Appellant V. EAGLE ROCK CUSTOM HOMES INC. AND MACK DAVIS, Appellees On Appeal from the 334th District Court Harris County,
OPINION KEM THOMPSON FROST, Chief Justice. This is an appeal from a summary judgment dismissing the plaintiffs claims against an insurer under an automobile insurance policy. The main issue is whether the insurance policy in effect at the time of the accident falls within the plain meaning of the term “renewal insurance policy” in sections 1952.101(c) an
Mack v. Mackpublic domain
RODOWSKY, Judge. This case involves an application to withhold nutrition and hydration administered through a gastrostomy tube to a previously competent,, adult, hospital patient who has been in a persistent vegetative state since June 1983, but who is not terminally ill. Because the evidence was inconclusive concerning any intent that the patient had, or would have, concerning the continuation or withholding of artificial n
WALTER CASTRO * NO. 2024-CA-0104 VERSUS * COURT OF APPEAL GASTON HAULING, LLC, * GASTON CORONEL, FOURTH CIRCUIT PROGRESSIVE PALOVERDE * INSURANCE COMPANY AND STATE OF LOUISIANA "ABC" INSURANCE ******* COMPANY APPEAL FROM
Affirmed in Part and Reversed and Rendered in Part, and Majority and Concurring Opinions filed August 31, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-19-00204-CV CCC GROUP, INC., Appellant V. ENDURO COMPOSITES, INC. AND J.P. MACK INDUSTRIES, LLC, Appellees On Appeal from the 190th
MacK v. MacKpublic domain
329 Md. 188 (1993) 618 A.2d 744 DEANNA MACK v. RONALD E. MACK. No. 29, September Term, 1992. Court of Appeals of Maryland. February 2, 1993. C. Christopher Brown (Rachel A. Wohl, Brown, Goldstein & Levy, all on brief), Baltimore, for petitioner. Leslie Fried (Legal Aid Bureau, Silver Spring), Joan O'Sullivan (Legal Aid Bureau, Anna
MARCUS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiff Mack Davis appeals the district court’s grant of Defendant Town of Lake Park’s motion for judgment as a matter of law on his Title VII race discrimination claim. Davis, an African-American police officer in the Town, alleges that he suffered adverse employment action based on race in the form of two corrective job performance memos placed in hi
Sorrento Therapeutics Inc. v. Anthony Mackpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF CHANCERY OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE SORRENTO THERAPEUTICS, ) INC., a Delaware corporation, and ) SCILEX PHARMACEUTICALS ) INC., a Delaware corporation, ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) C.A. No. 2021-0210-PAF ) ANTHONY MACK,