Cases

Opinion Tsoucalas, Senior Judge: NMB Thai Ltd., Pelmec Thai Ltd., NMB Hi-Tech Bearings Ltd. and NMB Corporation (collectively “NMB”), defendant-intervenors, move this Court pursuant to Rule 59 of the Rules of the Court for rehearing and reconsideration of plaintiffs application for preliminary injunction. NMB requests that the Court vacate the Preliminary Injunction Order dated August 13, 1996 and

IN THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE STATE OF DELAWARE MARY A. CARROLL and BETTY C. LYNN, on behalf of themselves and all Others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. C.A. No. 03C-08-l67 AML PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., a Foreign Corporation, f/l</a PHILIP MORRIS INCORPORATED, Defendant. \_/\/\./\_/\./\/\./\/\/\/\/\./ Submitted: February 3, 2017 Decided: May 30, 2017 OPINION Philip M. Finestrauss, Esquire, PHILIP M. FINESTRAUSS, P.A., Wilmington, Delaware; Stephen R. Fine, Esquire, LAW OFFICES OF STEPHE

Flaum, Circuit Judge. *439A jury convicted defendant-appellant Donald S. Harden of conspiring to distribute heroin, the use of which resulted in the death of Fred Schnettler. Harden was sentenced to life in prison under 21 U.S.C. § 841

U NITED S TATES N AVY –M ARINE C ORPS C OURT OF C RIMINAL A PPEALS _________________________ No. 201600379 _________________________ UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Appellee v. RANDY M. SO Private First Class (E-2), U.S. Marine Corps Appel

OPINION AND ORDER James P. Jones, United States District Judge A jury has convicted the defendant, a top official of a public utility, of corruption and tax fraud charges. She has moved for acquittal notwithstanding the jury’s verdict and alternatively for a new trial before a different jury. For the reasons hereafter explained, I will deny her motions. In summary, I hold that the government presente

Opinion on Summary Judgment LYNN N. HUGHES, District Judge. 1. Introduction. The government has sued two partners for tax refunds they had been paid. It says that their income was a commission rather than a return from an investment. The partners say that they earned money from the sale of their interest in a portfolio they managed and that the income should be taxed as capita

LUCERO, Circuit Judge. Thomas Francis Hale filed for bankruptcy in 2005. During the course of that bankruptcy, he allegedly lied under oath and attempted to conceal from the bankruptcy trustee an agreement to sell property. After his relationship with the trustee became antagonistic, Hale sent her a package with unidentified material and a note that said, “Possible Haz-mat? Te

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐1270 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. DONALD S. HARDEN, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐1270 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. DONALD S. HARDEN, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 17‐1270 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Plaintiff‐Appellee, v. DONALD S. HARDEN, Defendant‐Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for

JONES, Judge: J.M. petitions this court for extraordinary relief in the nature of a writ of mandamus. She seeks relief from a lower court ruling ordering the production and disclosure of her privileged mental health records based on the now-excised, constitutional exception to the psychotherapist-patient privilege, Military Rule of Evidence (Mil. R. Evid.) 513,

SUPERIOR COURT OF "I HE VIRGIN ISLANDS DIVISION OF S"! CROIX JLI m ST ROSE; VIRGIME GEORCE9 R\YMO\D Case 1N0 SK 2002 CV 00598 AI LEYNE; EDG «R B xRRIOS, m!) OTHER PFRSONS T00 NLMEROl 5 T0 0112mm, A CLASS AC1 10x i Action for Damages PI UNTIHS, Complex Litigation Division V

Laurence, J. This case presents the following question under a provision of the mechanic’s lien statute, G. L. c. 254, § 42: Does a subcontractor’s transportation and delivery of a large piece of equipment (a used transformer owned by a nuclear power plant) to the power plant site and the placement of that equipment by the subcontractor onto a concrete pad, where it was stored as spare or backup equip

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ____________ No. 15-2169 ____________ UNITED STATES ex rel. CUSTOMS FRAUD INVESTIGATIONS, LLC., Appellant v. VICTAULIC COMPANY On Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of Pennsylvania

472 F.Supp.2d 1220 (2007) CITY OF MOSES LAKE, a Washington municipal corporation, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. CV-04-0376-AAM. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. January 3, 2007. *1221 *1222 Jessica K. Ferrell, Linda Rae Larson, Steven Gary Jo

458 F.Supp.2d 1198 (2006) CITY OF MOSES LAKE, a Washington municipal corporation, Plaintiff, v. The UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. CV-04-0376-AAM. United States District Court, E.D. Washington. October 16, 2006. *1204 Steven Gary Jones, Jeffrey Barnes Kray, Jessica K. Ferrell, Marten Law Group PLLC, Seattle, WA

U.S. v. Rockwood UNITED STATES, Appellee v. Lawrence P. ROCKWOOD, II, Captain U.S. ARMY, Appellant No. 98-0488 Crim. App. No. 9500872 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ARMED FORCES Argued February 26, 1999 Decided September 30, 1999 COX, C.J., delivered the opinion of the Court, in which CRAWFORD, GIERKE, and EFFRON, JJ., joined. GIERKE, J., filed a concurring opinion. SULLIVAN,

MEMORANDUM SYLVIA H. RAMBO, District Judge. Presently before the court are three motions for leave to intervene. The proposed intervenors seek leave to intervene in this action as party defendants as a matter of right under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(a)(2), or, in the alternative, for permissive intervention under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 24(b)(1). For the reasons set forth below

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW I. Introduction Barzilay, Judge: Plaintiff, Sassy, Inc. (“Sassy”), imports pacifiers from Austria. The pacifiers in issue are model number 513, known as MAM MINI ULTI and model number 505, known as MAM ULTI MAM. The United States Customs Service (“Customs”) classified the subject m

Whitaker, Judge, delivered the opinion of the court: This controversy has been referred to us by House Kesolution No. 385 of the 85th Congress, 1st Session, with a request *625for a report, “giving findings of fact and conclusions thereon as shall be sufficient to inform the Congress of the nature and character of the demand, as a claim legal or