Cases

961 So.2d 1163 (2007) STATE of Louisiana v. Salvador MANGANO and Mabel Mangano. No. 2007-OK-1717. Supreme Court of Louisiana. August 23, 2007. Writ denied. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a new deadline for filing writs related to the initial motion to quash when the state failed to file its writ application or request an extension

In re Blanco, Kathleen Babineaux Gov.; — Other; Applying for Supervisory *1164and/or Remedial Writs, Parish of West Feliciana, 20th Judicial District Court Div. A, No. 07-WLFN-12; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. 2007 KW 1604. Writ denied. The trial judge did not abuse his discretion in refusing to grant a new deadline for filing writs related to the initial motion to quas

22-861(L) United States v. Mangano UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2023 (Argued: February 15, 2024 Decided: February 13, 2025) Docket Nos. 22-861(L), 22-937(Con) –––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––––– UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,

By Judge Thomas D. Horne On December 23, 1992, this Court heard counsels’ arguments on Plaintiff’s Motion to Compel Discovery. At that time, the Court ruled on all of plaintiff’s discovery requests with the exception of those relating to the production of information to which a privilege is asserted pursuant to § 8.01-581.17, Code of Virginia. Because of the differing rulings among the circuit courts in Virginia regarding the

People v Johnson (2024 NY Slip Op 05811) People v Johnson 2024 NY Slip Op 05811 Decided on November 20, 2024 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries based on negligence, breach of warranty, and strict products liability, the plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the *590Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.), dated January 23, 1998, which, upon the granting of the respective motions of the defendant and the third-party defendant pursuant to CPLR 4401 for judgment as a matter of law dismissi

Paula Xinis, United States District Judge Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs Carol and Stuart Kerkhof's Emergency *930Motion to Remand. ECF No. 15. The motion is fully briefed, and no hearing is necessary. See Loc. R. 105.6. For the following reasons, the Court GRANTS the Kerkhofs' motion. I. Background

—In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring the invalidity of a Master License Agreement between the Town of Brookhaven and West Meadow Beach Cottage Owners, Inc., the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Floyd, J.), entered June 9, 1995, which, inter alia, declared the Master License Agreement to be invalid and ordered the removal of privately-owned cottages from public park land at West Meadow Beach.

RILEY, Chief Judge. A jury convicted Willie Johnson of three federal narcotics crimes. Johnson appeals the district court’s 1 partial denial of his 18 U.S.C. § 3582(c)(2) motion for a sentence *466 modification. The district court reduced J

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered September 16, 2013, which denied the motion of defendant Ann-Gur Realty Corporation (Ann-Gur) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Ann-Gur failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff was injured when he allegedly tripped and fell after stepping in a defect

Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Sharon A.M. Aarons, J.), entered September 16, 2013, which denied the motion of defendant Ann-Gur Realty Corporation (Ann-Gur) for summary judgment dismissing the complaint as against it, unanimously affirmed, without costs. Ann-Gur failed to establish its entitlement to judgment as a matter of law in this action where plaintiff was injured when he allegedly tripped and fell after stepping in a defect

774 So.2d 101 (2000) Evelyn JENKINS, et al. v. MANGANO CORPORATION, et al. No. 00-CC-0790. Supreme Court of Louisiana. November 28, 2000. Concurring Opinion December 4, 2000. Malinda Frances Holmes, III, Kenner, Counsel for Applicant. Lindsey M. Ladouceur, New Orleans, Stephen Nolan Elliott, Robert A. Knight, Ann M. Sico, Metarie, Counsel for

Opinions of the United 2004 Decisions States Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit 12-29-2004 Slutzker v. Johnson Precedential or Non-Prece

Connolly, J. On July 26 and 27, 2000, this matter was before this court for hearing on the motion of the defendant, Anthony Mangano, to suppress an out-of-court voice identification of the defendant made by Patricia O’Brien. In support of this motion the defendant argues that the voice identification was unnecessarily suggestive and conducive to mistaken identification so as to deny the defendant due process of law under the Four

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate a decision and order of this Court dated July 30, 1990 (People v Johnson, 163 AD2d 613), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, rendered August 15, 1988, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. Ordered that the application is denied. The defendant has failed to establish that he was denied the effec

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated August 17, 1998 (People v Johnson, 253 AD2d 577), affirming a sentence of the Supreme Court, Kings County, imposed September 11, 1995. Ordered that the application is denied. The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the eff

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 628 OPINION. {¶ 1} The plaintiff-appellant, Maria Johnson, appeals from the order of the trial court dismissing her amended complaint against the defendant-appellee, Microsoft Corporation, under Civ.R. 12(B)(6). The amended complaint conta

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 7, 1991 (People v "Johnson, 176 AD2d 756), modifying two judgments of the Supreme Court, Queens County, both rendered May 4, 1989. Ordered that the application is denied. The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied th

—Application by the appellant for a writ of error coram nobis to vacate, on the ground of ineffective assistance of appellate counsel, a decision and order of this Court dated October 26, 1998 (People v Johnson, 254 AD2d 499), affirming a judgment of the Supreme Court, Kings County, rendered May 24, 1995. Ordered that the application is denied. The appellant has failed to establish that he was denied the effect

—Appeal by the defendant from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Rios, J.), rendered April 21, 1998, convicting him of criminal sale of a controlled substance in the third degree and criminal possession of a controlled substance in the seventh degree, upon a jury verdict, and imposing sentence. The appeal brings *407up for review the denial, after a hearing (Cooperaran, J.), of that branc