Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “MARABLE v. United States”
Marable v. United Statespublic domain
Ct. Mil. App. Certiorari denied.
Marable v. Alabamapublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
Marable v. Alabamapublic domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the Court of Criminal Appeals of Alabama denied.
Marable v. Mosleypublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
London-Marable v. Boeing Co.public domain
C. A. 9th Cir. Certiorari denied.
London-Marable v. Boeing Co.public domain
Petition for writ of certiorari to the United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit denied. Same case below, 357 Fed. Appx. 61.
Marable v. Mosleypublic domain
C. A. 11th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Marable v. Hinklepublic domain
C. A. 4th Cir. Certiorari denied.
Marable v. Mosley, Wardenpublic domain
538 U.S. 1039 MARABLEv.MOSLEY, WARDEN, ET AL. No. 02-9554. Supreme Court of United States. May 19, 2003. 1 CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE ELEVENTH CIRCUIT. 2
United States v. Marablepublic domain
814 F.2d 661 *U.S.v.Marable 86-7499 United States Court of Appeals,Eleventh Circuit. 3/4/87 1 M.D.Ala. AFFIRMED 2 ---------------
Marable v. Michiganpublic domain
Ct. App. Mich. Certio-rari denied.
United States v. Marablepublic domain
570 F.2d 346 U. S.v.Marable No. 77-1174 United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit 2/6/78 1 E.D.Va. AFFIRMED
United States v. Schuyler L. Marablepublic domain
ERWIN, District Judge: Defendant was found guilty of the offense of assault with a deadly weapon, in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 113(f). At trial and on the day of sentencing, defendant moved for a judgment of acquittal pursuant to Rule 29(a) of the Federal Rules of Criminal Procedure. The motions were denied. The basis of the motions and this appeal is that the Government presente
United States v. Melvin Marablepublic domain
CHARLES CLARK, Circuit Judge: The defendant Melvin Marable appeals his conviction after trial to a jury for conspiring to possess cocaine with intent to distribute it, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 846, and to distribute it, in violation of 21 U.S.C.A. § 841(a)(1). This court recently affirmed an earlier conviction of Marable for co
Marable v. Bank of New York Mellon (In re Marable)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER AFFIRMING APPEAL FROM THE UNITED STATES BANKRUPTCY COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF TEXAS SHERMAN DIVISION (CASE NUMBER 11-43002-BTR-13) AMOS L. MAZZANT, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Pending before the Court is John O. Marable, Jr.’s (“Marable” or “Debtor”) appeal from the bankruptcy court’s November 4, 2015 Order Granting Motion for Relief from Automatic Stay and Co-Debtor Stay
State of Tennessee v. Bobby Marable IIpublic domain
02/05/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON October 3, 2023 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. BOBBY MARABLE II Appeal from the Circuit Court for Gibson County No. 19568 Clayburn L. Peeples, Judge No. W2022-01591-CCA-R3-CD The Def
Marable v. Nitchmanpublic domain
511 F.3d 924 (2007) Ken MARABLE, the senior Chief Engineer of The Washington State Ferries and a married man and his marital community, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Mark NITCHMAN, former Director of Preservation and Maintenance of the Washington State Ferries; Douglas MacDonald, Director of the Washington State Department of Transportation; Richard D. Phillips, a Staff Chief of the Washington State Ferries, Defendants-Appellees.
Marable v. Nitchmanpublic domain
MEMORANDUM * Ken Marable appeals the district court’s dismissal of his case on a motion for summary judgment in favor of the defendants. Specifically, Marable appeals the district court’s summary judgment dismissing the following causes of action for which Marable seeks both damages and injunctive relief to “protect [his] rights ... under the U.S. Constitution”: 1) a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim alleging violation
Marable v. Marion Military Institutepublic domain
ORDER CALLIE V.S. GRANADE, District Judge. This matter is before the court on the motion for summary judgment of the defendants, Marion Military Institute (“MMI”), and Col. Thomas L. Tate (“Tate”), in his individual and official capacities (collectively, “the defendants”). (Doc. 69). The defendants and the plaintiff, Reginald D. Marable, Sr. (“Marable”), have filed briefs and evidentiary materi
United States v. Melvin Marable and Douglas E. Jonespublic domain
COLEMAN, Circuit Judge. MULTI PARTY-MULTI ATTACK Melvin Marable, Douglas Jones, Horace Jones, and Clarence Cole, Jr. were jointly indicted in a three-count indictment for drug offenses. Count 1 charged all four men with conspiring to possess with the intent to dis