Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
5 opinions for “MARIA ELENA RAMIREZ CARMONA”
Maldonado-Cátala v. Municipality of Naranjitopublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER BRUCE J. McGIVERIN, United States Magistrate Judge. Maribel Maldonado-Cátala (“Maldonado”) brings this suit against the Municipality of Naranjito, Orlando Ortiz-Chevres, Marialis Figueroa-Negrón, José Figueroa-Nieves, Hiram Bristol-Colon, José To-más Rodríguez-Veléz, and Insurance Company ABC (collectively “the Municipality”), alleging hostile work environment and retaliation
Martinez v. Nash Finch Co.public domain
OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING, IN PART, MOTION TO DISMISS MARCIA S. KRIEGER, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court pursuant to the Defendant’s (“Avanza”) Motion to Dismiss (# 14), the Plaintiffs’ response (# 17), and Avanza’s reply (# 20). FACTS Although lengthy, the Plaintiffs’ Amended Complaint (# 3) describes a straightforward factual sc
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder
Wieland v. Assaf (In re Briones-Coroy)public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIDNEY B. BROOKS, Bankruptcy Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .690 II. Summary.691 A. A Summary of this Opinion.691 B. The Enactment of 11 U.S.C. § 110 in the Reform Act of 1994 .692 C. The 2005 Amendments .693 D. The Unintended Consequences of 11 U.S.C. § 110.694
Garcia v. Tyson Foods, Inc.public domain
MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under