⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “MARK JAMES FLORY”

Houston v. Florypublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014-11-20 · Published · cited 0× · 329 Ga. App. 882; 766 S.E.2d 227; 2014 Ga. App. LEXIS 791
Branch, Judge. In 1998, a father divided approximately ten acres of land into two parcels and conveyed one each to his son, Earnest Smith, and daughter, Rebecka Flory. The two conveyances included mutual *883easements over three gravel drives located on the properties, two of which were clearly marked on plats referenced in each deed; the deeds provided only a descrip
California Court of Appeal · 2010-08-09 · Published · cited 7× · 187 Cal. App. 4th 276; 113 Cal. Rptr. 3d 445; 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1372
OPINION Plaintiffs Karoleen and Magda Mito appeal from an order dismissing their complaint with prejudice for failure to file it within the statute of limitations. Plaintiffs presented their complaint for filing to the superior court clerk on July 24, 2008, which date was within the applicable two-year statute of limitations. The clerk rejected it on the ground that plaintiffs failed to attach the "Civil Case Cover Sheet Addendum and Statement of Loca
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2014-11-20 · Published · cited 0×
THIRD DIVISION BARNES, P. J., BOGGS and BRANCH, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ November 20,
Estate of Zieglerpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 2010-08-31 · Published · cited 15× · 187 Cal. App. 4th 1357; 114 Cal. Rptr. 3d 863
* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1105(b) and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of part III. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1359 OPINION The statute of limitations serves noble public policies. It "
District Court, D. Kansas · 1997-08-29 · Published · cited 1× · 979 F. Supp. 1319; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 15900; 1997 WL 627395
979 F.Supp. 1319 (1997) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Mark Joshua BAILEY, Defendant. No. 96-40063-01-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 29, 1997. *1320 Charles D. Dedman, David J. Phillips, Office of Federal Public Defender, Topeka, KS, for Mark Joshua Bailey. Mark Joshua Bailey, Topeka, KS, pro
California Court of Appeal · 2010-08-31 · Published · cited 0× · 187 Cal. App. 4th 1357; 114 Cal. Rptr. 3d 863; 2010 Cal. App. LEXIS 1522
Opinion RICHLI, J. The statute of limitations serves noble public policies. It “ ‘promote[sj justice by preventing surprises through the revival of claims that have been allowed to slumber until evidence has been lost, memories have faded, and witnesses have disappeared.’ [Citations.]” (Parra v. City and County of San Francisco (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 977, 998 [50 Cal.Rptr.3d 822].) Its opera
District Court, D. Kansas · 1997-07-14 · Published · cited 5× · 979 F. Supp. 1315; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13372; 1997 WL 539474
979 F.Supp. 1315 (1997) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Mark Joshua BAILEY, Defendant. No. 96-40063-01-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 14, 1997. *1316 Charles D. Dedmon, David J. Phillips, Office of Federal Public Defender, Topeka, KS, for Defendant. Mark Joshua Bailey, Topeka, KS, pro se.
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1984-02-08 · Published · cited 26× · 726 F.2d 1007; 10 Media L. Rep. (BNA) 1359; 1984 U.S. App. LEXIS 25649
726 F.2d 1007 10 Media L. Rep. 1359 In re Lacie RUSSELL, Signe Waller, Mark Smith, Dale Sampson,Martha Nathan, Floris Cause, Paul Bermanzohn, NelsonJohnson, Thomas Clark, Frankie Powell, James Wrenn, DonaldPelles, Rand Manzella, Willena Cannon, Allen Blitz, KateWhite, and Joyce Johnson, Petitioners. No. 84-1018. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth
In Re Magraspublic domain
District Court, Virgin Islands · 1991-07-30 · Published · cited 4× · 129 B.R. 429; 1991 Bankr. LEXIS 1418; 21 Bankr. Ct. Dec. (CRR) 1543
129 B.R. 429 (1991) In re Harry MAGRAS. In re Florie MAGRAS. Bankruptcy Nos. 388-0011, 388-0012. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Virgin Islands, D. St. Thomas and St. John. July 30, 1991. *430 James S. Carroll, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., for The Small Business Adm'n. Mark Roadarmel, Asst. U.S. Trustee, Ronald W. Belfon, for deb
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2012-06-19 · Published · cited 69× · 684 F.3d 1088; 2012 WL 2308155; 2012 U.S. App. LEXIS 12481
HULL, Circuit Judge: Florida death row inmate George James Trepal appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. After review and oral argument, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND A. Overview In 1991, a Florida jury convicted Trepal, a sophisticated chemist and Mensa member,1 of murdering his neig
District Court, S.D. Ohio · 2001-09-18 · Published · cited 3× · 178 F. Supp. 2d 907; 2001 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 21019; 2001 WL 1628199
178 F.Supp.2d 907 (2001) GALLENSTEIN BROTHERS INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. C-1-00-756. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. September 18, 2001. *908 Jay Richard Langenbahn, James Michael Moore, Lindhorst & Dreidame, Cincinnati, OH, for plaintiff
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002-12-20 · Published · cited 14× · 313 F.3d 1259; 2002 U.S. App. LEXIS 26515; 2002 WL 31846322
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. I Defendant/appellant Steven Brent Tucker and co-defendants Laura Cornelius and Melissa Paxton were indicted on three counts: conspiracy to manufacture in excess of 500 grams of a mixture containing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; manufacturing in excess of 500 grams of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §
District Court, D. Kansas · 1999-11-09 · Published · cited 0× · 80 F. Supp. 2d 1207; 1999 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19875; 1999 WL 1268033
80 F.Supp.2d 1207 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Michael Joseph HODGE, Defendant. No. 99-40014-02-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. November 9, 1999. *1208 Mary Alice Agar, Florissant, MO, pro se. Terry Brian Agar, Florissant, MO, pro se. James E. Flory, Office of United States Attorney,
District Court, D. Kansas · 1993-06-04 · Published · cited 1× · 825 F. Supp. 949; 1993 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 9398; 1993 WL 249094
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VAN BEBBER, District Judge. This ease is before the court on defendant Lloyd Steven Grissom’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3) motion (Doc. 14) to suppress evidence. Defendant moves the court to suppress certain items that were seized from his house and certain statements allegedly made to agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The government opposes (Doc. 19) defend
In re Maaspublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1986-12-31 · Published · cited 1× · 11 Kan. App. 2d 597; 730 P.2d 368; 1986 Kan. App. LEXIS 1640
Brazil, J.: Mark R. Maas appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus on the finding that his right to a speedy trial had not been violated. Because, as stated by his attorney at oral argument, Maas has attempted to “cover every base,” a chronology of events might be appropriate. On April 4, 1986, a jury found Maas guilty in two cases consolidated for trial of
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2000-07-13 · Published · cited 1× · 219 F.3d 519
OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, now known as Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America (Travelers), alleges that the defendants engaged in a scheme to defraud Travelers in connection with its issuance of certain surety bonds. Specifically, Travelers contends that Patrick Leahey, a principal owner of both Leahey Construction Company, Inc. (LCC) and Leahey General Co
State v. Maaspublic domain
Supreme Court of Kansas · 1987-10-30 · Published · cited 13× · 744 P.2d 1222; 242 Kan. 44; 1987 Kan. LEXIS 433
242 Kan. 44 (1987) 744 P.2d 1222 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MARK R. MAAS, Appellant. No. 59,538 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed October 30, 1987. John W. Nitcher, of Riling, Norwood, Burkhead, Fairchild & Nitcher, of Lawrence, argued the cause, and James L. Postma, of the same firm, was with him on the briefs for a
United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia · 1992-03-06 · Published · cited 5× · 141 B.R. 453; 1992 WL 110067
141 B.R. 453 (1992) In re OAKS PARTNERS, LTD., a Georgia Limited Partnership, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 89-00948. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. February 20, 1992. Order Of Confirmation March 6, 1992. *454 *455 Mark S. Kaufman, J. James Johnson, Long, Ald
Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso) · 2005-09-07 · Published · cited 16× · 181 S.W.3d 386; 2005 WL 1847333
181 S.W.3d 386 (2005) Josefa GONZALEZ, Irene Gonzalez, Jose Gonzalez, and Gonzalez Family, L.P., Appellants, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., Craig R. Lentzsch, Jack W. Haugsland, Jeff W. Sanders, Frederick F. Richards, Mark E. Southerst, Floyd Holland, Richard J. Caley, Linda Chavez, Al A. Meitz, Frank L. Nageotte, Alfred E. Osborne, Jr., Stephen M. Peck, Thomas G. Plaskett, Ernest P. Werlin, Chris Enserberger, Directors, Luis Venegas, Mal Acosta, Tony
State v. McClanahanpublic domain
Court of Appeals of Kansas · 1990-05-18 · Published · cited 0× · 14 Kan. App. 2d 410; 792 P.2d 355; 1990 Kan. App. LEXIS 330
Rees, J.: Defendant Thomas L. McClanahan appeals from his jury conviction of indecent liberties with a child (K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 21-3503[l][a] or [b]) committed in November to December 1987. At trial, the State introduced damning hearsay evidence, testimonial evidence of out-of-court statements made by the child victim declarant, L.S., to prove the truth of the matter stated. The evidence was admitted under th