Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “MARK JAMES FLORY”
Houston v. Florypublic domain
Branch, Judge. In 1998, a father divided approximately ten acres of land into two parcels and conveyed one each to his son, Earnest Smith, and daughter, Rebecka Flory. The two conveyances included mutual *883easements over three gravel drives located on the properties, two of which were clearly marked on plats referenced in each deed; the deeds provided only a descrip
Mito v. Temple Recycling Center Corp.public domain
OPINION Plaintiffs Karoleen and Magda Mito appeal from an order dismissing their complaint with prejudice for failure to file it within the statute of limitations. Plaintiffs presented their complaint for filing to the superior court clerk on July 24, 2008, which date was within the applicable two-year statute of limitations. The clerk rejected it on the ground that plaintiffs failed to attach the "Civil Case Cover Sheet Addendum and Statement of Loca
Michael Houston v. Rebecka S. Florypublic domain
THIRD DIVISION BARNES, P. J., BOGGS and BRANCH, JJ. NOTICE: Motions for reconsideration must be physically received in our clerk’s office within ten days of the date of decision to be deemed timely filed. http://www.gaappeals.us/rules/ November 20,
Estate of Zieglerpublic domain
* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 8.1105(b) and 8.1110, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of part III. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1359 OPINION The statute of limitations serves noble public policies. It "
United States v. Baileypublic domain
979 F.Supp. 1319 (1997) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Mark Joshua BAILEY, Defendant. No. 96-40063-01-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. August 29, 1997. *1320 Charles D. Dedman, David J. Phillips, Office of Federal Public Defender, Topeka, KS, for Mark Joshua Bailey. Mark Joshua Bailey, Topeka, KS, pro
Larsen v. W.C. Cox & Co.public domain
Opinion RICHLI, J. The statute of limitations serves noble public policies. It “ ‘promote[sj justice by preventing surprises through the revival of claims that have been allowed to slumber until evidence has been lost, memories have faded, and witnesses have disappeared.’ [Citations.]” (Parra v. City and County of San Francisco (2006) 144 Cal.App.4th 977, 998 [50 Cal.Rptr.3d 822].) Its opera
United States v. Baileypublic domain
979 F.Supp. 1315 (1997) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Mark Joshua BAILEY, Defendant. No. 96-40063-01-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. July 14, 1997. *1316 Charles D. Dedmon, David J. Phillips, Office of Federal Public Defender, Topeka, KS, for Defendant. Mark Joshua Bailey, Topeka, KS, pro se.
726 F.2d 1007 10 Media L. Rep. 1359 In re Lacie RUSSELL, Signe Waller, Mark Smith, Dale Sampson,Martha Nathan, Floris Cause, Paul Bermanzohn, NelsonJohnson, Thomas Clark, Frankie Powell, James Wrenn, DonaldPelles, Rand Manzella, Willena Cannon, Allen Blitz, KateWhite, and Joyce Johnson, Petitioners. No. 84-1018. United States Court of Appeals,Fourth
In Re Magraspublic domain
129 B.R. 429 (1991) In re Harry MAGRAS. In re Florie MAGRAS. Bankruptcy Nos. 388-0011, 388-0012. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. Virgin Islands, D. St. Thomas and St. John. July 30, 1991. *430 James S. Carroll, III, Asst. U.S. Atty., for The Small Business Adm'n. Mark Roadarmel, Asst. U.S. Trustee, Ronald W. Belfon, for deb
HULL, Circuit Judge: Florida death row inmate George James Trepal appeals the district court’s denial of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 petition for a writ of habeas corpus. After review and oral argument, we affirm. I. BACKGROUND A. Overview In 1991, a Florida jury convicted Trepal, a sophisticated chemist and Mensa member,1 of murdering his neig
Gallenstein Bros. Inc. v. General Acc. Ins. Co.public domain
178 F.Supp.2d 907 (2001) GALLENSTEIN BROTHERS INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. GENERAL ACCIDENT INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants. No. C-1-00-756. United States District Court, S.D. Ohio, Western Division. September 18, 2001. *908 Jay Richard Langenbahn, James Michael Moore, Lindhorst & Dreidame, Cincinnati, OH, for plaintiff
United States v. Tuckerpublic domain
HOLLOWAY, Circuit Judge. I Defendant/appellant Steven Brent Tucker and co-defendants Laura Cornelius and Melissa Paxton were indicted on three counts: conspiracy to manufacture in excess of 500 grams of a mixture containing methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 846; manufacturing in excess of 500 grams of methamphetamine in violation of 21 U.S.C. §
United States v. Hodgepublic domain
80 F.Supp.2d 1207 (1999) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Michael Joseph HODGE, Defendant. No. 99-40014-02-SAC. United States District Court, D. Kansas. November 9, 1999. *1208 Mary Alice Agar, Florissant, MO, pro se. Terry Brian Agar, Florissant, MO, pro se. James E. Flory, Office of United States Attorney,
United States v. Grissompublic domain
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER VAN BEBBER, District Judge. This ease is before the court on defendant Lloyd Steven Grissom’s Fed.R.Crim.P. 12(b)(3) motion (Doc. 14) to suppress evidence. Defendant moves the court to suppress certain items that were seized from his house and certain statements allegedly made to agents of the Federal Bureau of Investigation (FBI). The government opposes (Doc. 19) defend
In re Maaspublic domain
Brazil, J.: Mark R. Maas appeals the trial court’s denial of his petition for writ of habeas corpus on the finding that his right to a speedy trial had not been violated. Because, as stated by his attorney at oral argument, Maas has attempted to “cover every base,” a chronology of events might be appropriate. On April 4, 1986, a jury found Maas guilty in two cases consolidated for trial of
OPINION GILMAN, Circuit Judge. Aetna Casualty and Surety Company, now known as Travelers Casualty and Surety Company of America (Travelers), alleges that the defendants engaged in a scheme to defraud Travelers in connection with its issuance of certain surety bonds. Specifically, Travelers contends that Patrick Leahey, a principal owner of both Leahey Construction Company, Inc. (LCC) and Leahey General Co
State v. Maaspublic domain
242 Kan. 44 (1987) 744 P.2d 1222 STATE OF KANSAS, Appellee, v. MARK R. MAAS, Appellant. No. 59,538 Supreme Court of Kansas. Opinion filed October 30, 1987. John W. Nitcher, of Riling, Norwood, Burkhead, Fairchild & Nitcher, of Lawrence, argued the cause, and James L. Postma, of the same firm, was with him on the briefs for a
In Re Oaks Partners, Ltd.public domain
141 B.R. 453 (1992) In re OAKS PARTNERS, LTD., a Georgia Limited Partnership, Debtor. Bankruptcy No. 89-00948. United States Bankruptcy Court, N.D. Georgia, Atlanta Division. February 20, 1992. Order Of Confirmation March 6, 1992. *454 *455 Mark S. Kaufman, J. James Johnson, Long, Ald
Gonzalez v. Greyhound Lines, Inc.public domain
181 S.W.3d 386 (2005) Josefa GONZALEZ, Irene Gonzalez, Jose Gonzalez, and Gonzalez Family, L.P., Appellants, v. GREYHOUND LINES, INC., Craig R. Lentzsch, Jack W. Haugsland, Jeff W. Sanders, Frederick F. Richards, Mark E. Southerst, Floyd Holland, Richard J. Caley, Linda Chavez, Al A. Meitz, Frank L. Nageotte, Alfred E. Osborne, Jr., Stephen M. Peck, Thomas G. Plaskett, Ernest P. Werlin, Chris Enserberger, Directors, Luis Venegas, Mal Acosta, Tony
State v. McClanahanpublic domain
Rees, J.: Defendant Thomas L. McClanahan appeals from his jury conviction of indecent liberties with a child (K.S.A. 1989 Supp. 21-3503[l][a] or [b]) committed in November to December 1987. At trial, the State introduced damning hearsay evidence, testimonial evidence of out-of-court statements made by the child victim declarant, L.S., to prove the truth of the matter stated. The evidence was admitted under th