Cases

962 P.2d 834 (1998) Verley HAWKINS, Respondent, v. Yukie MARSHALL & "John Doe" Marshall, wife and husband, and their marital community, Appellants. No. 21106-8-II. Court of Appeals of Washington, Division 2. August 14, 1998. Publication Ordered September 4, 1998. *835 David H. Olwell, David H. Olwell Law Offi

Appeal from a judgment of the Superior Court for Pierce County, No. 95-2-05826-0, Nile E. Aubrey, J., entered July 26, 1996. Reversed by unpublished opinion per Hunt, J., concurred in by Houghton, C.J., and Armstrong, J. Now published at 92 Wn. App. 38.

Supreme Court of Texas ══════════ No. 24-0339 ══════════ Webb Consolidated Independent School District, Petitioner, v. Robert Marshall and Amy Marshall, Respondents ═══════════════════════════════════════ On Petition for Review from the Court of

GRUENDER, Circuit Judge. Valerie Hawkins (“Hawkins”) and Janice Patterson (“Patterson”) appeal the district court’s1 grant of summary judgment in favor of Community Bank of Raymore (“Community”) on their claim under the Equal Credit Opportunity Act (“ECOA”), 15 U.S.C. § 1691 et seq., and the district court’s order striking their demand for a jury trial. For the reasons described below, w

MEMORANDUM * Robert Henry appeals the district court’s denial of his petition for habeas corpus. We affirm as to the issue of his Doyle rights1 but remand to the district court for an evidentiary hearing on the uncertified issue of actual innocence. Because the parties are familiar with the facts and the procedural history, we will not recount it here.

135 S.W.3d 72 (2004) Daniel Dallas HAWKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. No. 571-03. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. May 19, 2004. *73 Gaylyn Leon Cooper, Beaumont, for Appellant. *74 Betty Marshall, Assist. St. Atty., Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for State.

MEMORANDUM ** On a prior appeal, we ordered a limited remand pursuant to United States v. Ameline, 409 F.3d 1073 (9th Cir.2005) (en banc). The district court declined to alter Marshall’s sentence and also declined to conduct an in-person, live sentencing hearing. Marshall appeals, challenging the denial of a live resentencing hearing, the application of the career offender enhancement, and the rea

Agid, J. Yasmin Hawkins appeals a superior court judgment in favor of William Harnecker and Household Finance Corporation. She asserts the trial court erred when it ruled that Harnecker and Household Finance had valid encumbrances on her property. Because Yasmin validly quitclaimed all of her property rights and her signature was not required to encumber the property, we affirm. FACTS In 1

MEMORANDUM ** Robert Joseph Marshall appeals his conviction for conspiracy to distribute a controlled substance, distribution of a controlled substance, and aiding and abetting. 18 U.S.C. §§ 841(a)(1), 846, 8 U.S.C. § 2. The facts, contained in documents which remain under seal, are known to the parties. Marshall argues that the warrant-issuing judge abused his discretion in approving c

The opinion of the Court was delivered by LANDAU, J.A.D. On October 4, 1993, defendant Mark Hawkins was indicted in Camden County on counts of first degree robbery (N.J.S.A. 2C:15-1) and third degree hindering prosecution (N.J.S.A. 2C:29-3b(l)). In 1994, he entered a retraxit plea of guilty on the armed robbery count subject to the court’s acceptance of a plea bargain in which the State was to rec

547 Pa. 652 (1997) 692 A.2d 1068 COMMONWEALTH of Pennsylvania, Appellee, v. Michael HAWKINS, Appellant. Supreme Court of Pennsylvania. Argued December 12, 1996. Decided April 22, 1997. *654 David Zuckerman, Philadelphia, for Michael Hawkins. Catherine Marshall and Hugh J. Burns, Jr., Philadelphia, f

871 S.W.2d 539 (1994) Willie L. HAWKINS, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 2-92-381-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. March 8, 1994. *540 Travis W. Young, Fort Worth, for appellant. Tim Curry, Crim. Dist. Atty.; Betty Marshall and Charles M. Mallin, Asst. Chiefs of Appellate Section; Francine Y. Lyles,

This is an appeal from a judgment awarding workmen's compensation benefits for permanent and total disability. In October 1991, Billy Hawkins filed a complaint against his employer, Hypeco, Inc. He alleged that, as a result of two separate furnace malfunctions, he was exposed to and inhaled natural gas while working within the line and scope of his employment. He further alleged that as a result, he suffered pulmonary damage. Hypeco responded, inter alia, that, because Hawkins

PER CURIAM: We are called upon to determine whether the complete failure to instruct a jury in a criminal ease with respect to a particular offense requires automatic reversal of a conviction on collateral review. At the outset, we emphasize that this case does not involve the failure to instruct on a single element of an offense, but the failure to instruct on any element of a particular offense. As did the distric

[Cite as State v. Hawkins, 2021-Ohio-3072.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS TWELFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT OF OHIO WARREN COUNTY STATE OF OHIO, : Appellee, : CASE NO. CA2020-07-039 : OPINION - vs -

USCA4 Appeal: 24-1791 Doc: 40 Filed: 08/20/2025 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 24-1791 GEORGE HAWKINS, Plaintiff - Appellant, v. GLENN YOUNGKIN, in his official capacity as Governor of Virginia; KELLY GEE, in he

This is a condemnation case. Thomas W. Griffin and Lynn Taylor made an application in the Probate Court of Marshall County for the condemnation of land owned by Gerald W. and Brooks H. Hawkins for the purpose of obtaining a right-of-way. The right-of-way was necessary as plaintiffs' property is not adjacent to or contiguous to any public road or highway. Both the Probate Court of Marshall County and the Circuit Court of Marshall County condemned the property for a privat

This is an appeal from a conviction for the offense of possession of a controlled substance, to-wit: heroin. After the jury found as "true" the allegation of two prior felony convictions, the punishment was assessed at life imprisonment. On appeal the conviction was affirmed by the Ft. Worth Court of Appeals. Hawkins v. State, 644 S.W.2d 764 (Tex.App.-Ft. Worth 1983). That court found the trial court did not err in failing to suppress the in

12/05/2023 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT KNOXVILLE September 20, 2023 Session PENNY LAWSON, ET AL. v. HAWKINS COUNTY, TN, ET AL. Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hawkins County No. 20-CV-37 Alex E. Pearson, Judge No. E2020-01529-COA-R3-CV This

PRATHER, Justice, for the Court: I. INTRODUCTION This case involves an appeal of the conviction of Sue Marshall in the Pike County Circuit Court on the charge of unlawful possession of more than one ounce of marijuana with the intent to distribute. Marshall contends that her conviction should be reversed because the evidence used against her was derivative of an unlawful search and seizure. I