Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
8 opinions for “MARTIN AARON KAIN”
Warner v. Kainpublic domain
Warner v Kain (2018 NY Slip Op 04630) Warner v Kain 2018 NY Slip Op 04630 Decided on June 21, 2018 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.</
In re Russellpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OF DECISION Honorable Benjamin P. Hursh, U.S. Bankruptcy Judge At Butte in said District this 27th day of February, 2017. In the above-captioned Chapter 7 bankruptcy case, after due notice a hearing was held at Missoula on February 16, 2017, on the Motion to Modify Stay (Document No. 24) (“Motion”) filed by creditors KS Ventures, LLC (“KS Ventures”) and Merry Moose. Investment,
State v. Humphreyspublic domain
70 S.W.3d 752 (2001) STATE of Tennessee v. Harold W. HUMPHREYS. Court of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee, at Nashville. July 26, 2001. Application for Permission to Appeal Denied December 31, 2001. *756 Lee Ofman, Franklin, TN, for appellant, Harold W. Humphreys. Paul G. Summers, Attorney General and Reporter, Michael Moore,
Immigration & Naturalization Service v. St. Cyrpublic domain
533 U.S. 289 (2001) IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE v. ST. CYR No. 00-767. United States Supreme Court. Argued April 24, 2001. Decided June 25, 2001. CERTIORARI TO THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT *290 *291 Stevens, J., delivered the opinion of
Jenkins v. State of Missouripublic domain
807 F.2d 657 36 Ed. Law Rep. 569 Kalima JENKINS, by her next friend, Kamau AGYEI, et al.,Appellants/Appellees,andAmerican Federation of Teachers, Local 691, Appellant/Appellee,v.The STATE OF MISSOURI, et al., Appellants/Appellees,Park Hill School District R-5 and Dr. Merlin A. Ludwig,Superintendent thereof, et al., Appellees. Nos. 85-1765, 85-1949, 85-1974 and 85-207
Wolfe, Jennifer Bannerpublic domain
PD-0292-15 COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS Transmitted 12/17/2015 4:35:05 PM Accepted 12/18/2015 8:08:53 AM
Harrington v. Pierpublic domain
Marshall, J The vital question presented for adjudication on this appeal is, Is the bequest to trustees to. promote temperance work in the city of Milwaukee void for uncertainty? That involves the coitsideration of several cases where the important questions involved have been decided by this court, but without such a strict adherence to a definite judicial policy in each case and reasons given for the conclusions reached that it
In re Brosnahanpublic domain
Miller, Justice. The prisoner in this case is brought before us by virtue of a writ of habeas corpus issued under the authority of this court, and directed to John W. Rucker, in whoso custody the petitioner stated himself to be. To this writ Mr. Rucker, at the time of producing the body of his prisoner, makes return that he holds him* in custody by virtue of a precept to him directed as constable by A. W. Allen, a justice