Cases

MEMORANDUM WILLIAM J. HAYNES, JR., Chief Judge. Plaintiff, Jeremy Wilborn, by his next friend and conservator, Tara Wilborn, filed this action under 28 U.S.C. § 1331, the federal question statute against the Defendants: Larry Martin, Interim Commissioner, Tennessee Department of Finance and Administration; Darin Gordon, Deputy Commissioner and Director, TennCare Bureau and Patti Killingsworth, Assistant C

404 B.R. 841 (2009) In re Judy WILBORN, Debtor. Judy C. Wilborn, Karlton E. Flournoy, Monica E. Flournoy, and Judith A. Martin on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., f/k/a Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 03-48263-H4-13. Adversary No. 07-03481. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division.

609 F.3d 748 (2010) In the Matter of: Judy C. WILBORN, Debtor. Judy C. Wilborn; Karlton E. Flournoy; Monica E. Flournoy; Judith A. Martin, Appellees, v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., Appellant. No. 09-20415. United States Court of Appeals, Fifth Circuit. June 18, 2010. *750 Casey Dalton Ebert, Ebert Law Offices, P.C., Hurst, TX, fo

401 B.R. 872 (2009) In re Judy WILBORN, Debtor. Judy Wilborn, Karlton Flournoy, Monica Flournoy, and Judith Martin, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., f/k/a Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 03-48263-H4-13. Adversary No. 07-3481. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. Fe

401 B.R. 848 (2009) In re Judy WILBORN, Debtor. Judy Wilborn, Karlton Flournoy, Monica Flournoy, and Judith Martin, on behalf of themselves and those similarly situated, Plaintiffs v. Wells Fargo Bank, N.A., f/k/a Wells Fargo Home Mortgage, Inc., Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 03-48263-H4-13. Adversary No. 07-3481. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. Fe

Cupp, J. {¶ 1} In this case we decide whether a provision in a residential-mortgage contract requiring a borrower to pay the lender’s attorney fees as a condition of reinstatement of the borrower’s defaulted mortgage after the lender initiates foreclosure proceedings violates Ohio’s public policy. Because we conclude that such a provision does not violate public policy, we affirm the court of appeals’ judgment.

REAVLEY, Circuit Judge: This is an interlocutory appeal from the bankruptcy court’s certification of a class action in an adversary proceeding. The Plaintiffs-Appellees sought to represent a class of debtors who had filed Chapter 13 petitions in the United States Bankruptcy Court for the Southern District of Texas and who had home mortgages held or serviced by Defendant-Appellant Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. The questions at issue

[Cite as State v. Wilborn, 2024-Ohio-5003.] COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO EIGHTH APPELLATE DISTRICT COUNTY OF CUYAHOGA STATE OF OHIO, : Plaintiff-Appellee, : No. 113289 v. : JIMMY WILBORN, :

ANTHONY REX GABBERT, Judge. Raymond Lee Wilborn (Husband) appeals the circuit court’s judgment dissolving his marriage to Tracey Lee Wilborn (Wife). Husband asserts five points on appeal. First, he alleges that the court erred and misapplied the law in classifying as marital property and awarding $19,967 which represented Husband’s contribution to his railroad retirement pension

FAY, Circuit Judge: ■This appeal concerns constitutional violations alleged by students against high school officials for detaining them for breathalyzer tests prior to entering their Junior/Senior Prom as well as the high school, the school district, and county sheriff. Summary judgment was granted to all defendants. We affirm. I. FACTUAL AND PROCEDU

NO. 07-06-0389-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A AUGUST 20, 2008 ______________________________ JESSIE ALLEN WILBORN, APPELLANT V.

NO. 07-06-0389-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A AUGUST 20, 2008 ______________________________ JESSIE ALLEN WILBORN, APPELLANT

NO. 07-06-0389-CR IN THE COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO PANEL A AUGUST 20, 2008 Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â Â _____________________

Cite as 2023 Ark. App. 297 ARKANSAS COURT OF APPEALS DIVISION IV No. CV-20-628 WILLIAM ANGEL, PATRICIA BELK, Opinion Delivered May 24, 2023 DOROTHY BROWN, ROBERT BROWN, ANTHONY BUGGS, JEAN APPEAL FROM THE PHILLIPS CARTER, ALBERTA CARTWRIGHT, COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT EUGENE CARTWRIGHT, FRANCES [NO. 54CV-18-216] LOU

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-3290 MARTIN J. WALSH, Secretary of Labor, Petitioner-Appellee, v. ALIGHT SOLUTIONS LLC, Respondent-Appellant. ____________________ Appeal from the United States District Court for th

ORDER ¶ 1 Upon consideration of (1) respondent's affidavit, prepared in compliance with Rule 8.1, Rules Governing Disciplinary Proceedings, 5 O.S. 2001, Ch. 1, App. 1-A, by which a request is made that he be allowed to relinquish his license to practice law (cum membership in the Oklahoma Bar Association [Bar]) and (2) complainant's application for order approving resignation be granted, ¶ 2 THE COURT FINDS AND HOLDS:

March 14, 2008 Mr. Douglas Alexander Alexander Dubose Jones & Townsend, LLP 515 Congress Avenue, Suite 1720 Austin, TX 78701-3520 Mr. E. R. Fleuriet The Fleuriet Law Firm, P.C. 621 E. Tyler Harlingen, TX 78550 RE: Case Number: 07-0495 Court of Appeals Number: 13-04-00409-CV Trial Court Number: C-939-98-A Style: SOUTHWEST GRAIN CO. v. MARTIN P. GARZA, JR., ABEL N. GONZALEZ, JR. AND AIDA GRACIELA GONZALEZ Dear Counsel: Today the Supreme Court of

Complainants are minority stockholders in The First National Bank of Albertville, which, by resolution of the stockholders in November 1937, went into voluntary liquidation under the provisions of sections 5220 and 5221 of the United States Revised Statutes, 12 U.S.C.A. §§ 181, 182, with the election of J. W. Bishop, J. V. Waldrop and E. D. Vinyard as a liquidating committee of said bank. The board of directors is

56 F.3d 72NOTICE: Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3 provides that dispositions other than opinions or orders designated for publication are not precedential and should not be cited except when relevant under the doctrines of law of the case, res judicata, or collateral estoppel. Charles Michael MARTIN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.STATE OF ARIZONA DEPARTMENT OF CORRECTIONS, et al.,Defendants-Apellees. No. 94-15378.

September 03, 2004 Mr. Raul A. Gonzalez Locke Liddell & Sapp LLP 100 Congress Ave., Suite 300 Austin, TX 78701 Mr. Larry Zinn P. O. Box 12448 San Antonio, TX 78212 RE: Case Number: 01-0910 Court of Appeals Number: 13-99-00769-CV Trial Court Number: 99-01-100-A Style: FIRST VALLEY BANK OF LOS FRESNOS, NORWEST BANK OF TEXAS, N.A., AND WELLS FARGO BANK (TEXAS), N.A. v. SAM MARTIN Dear Counsel: Today the Supreme Court of Texas delivered the enclos