Cases

MESKILL, Chief Judge: Appellants, all American citizens or residents, are more than one hundred “Names” in the Corporation of Lloyd’s (Lloyd’s). Loosely speaking, Names are investors in Lloyd’s syndicates, the entities that nominally underwrite insurance risk. For convenience we will refer to the syndicates as entities; although this is a disputed issue on appeal, we affirm on a different basis and therefore need not resol

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1416 OPINION This is a petition seeking relief by writ of mandate after respondent court entered an order disqualifying petitioner Baker Manock Jensen (hereafter the law firm) from serving as attorneys for any party in the probate action pending before respondent. We will grant the petition and

STOKER, Judge. For the reasons stated in Doiron v. Southern Silica of Louisiana, 613 So.2d 1064 (La.App. 3d Cir.1993), No. 91-1385 on the docket of this court, we affirm the judgment of the trial court. We assess costs of this appeal to CLEMTEX, LTD. AFFIRMED.

SABERS, Justice (dissenting in part, concurring in part). [¶44.] I dissent on Issue II. The trial court stated not once, but three times that the agreement was contingent upon Cheryl and Diane transferring their property interests. Additionally, the court ruled that if they did not voluntarily transfer those interests, the court would do it for them. When the trial court later c

578 N.W.2d 784 (1998) STATE of Minnesota, Appellant, v. Jamie Lee AUBID, Respondent. No. C4-97-2004. Court of Appeals of Minnesota. May 19, 1998. Review Granted July 16, 1998. *785 Hubert H. Humphrey III, Attorney General, Catherine M. Keane, Assistant Attorney General, Marvin E. Ketola, Carlton County Attorney,

908 So.2d 875 (2005) Annie Pearl RICE; J.B. Brown; Minnie Hopkins; Deasia Hill, Who Sues by and Through Her Mother and Next Friend, Cassandra Hill; Willie Brown; Brenda Roby; Bobbie Jean Roby; Antonio Roby, Who Sues by and Through His Next Friend, Bobbie Jean Roby; Molly Foote; Julia M. Foote; Ruthie Cockrell; and Marvin Cockrell, Appellants/Cross-Appellees, v. PERMA CORPORATION, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. No. 2003-CA-02303-C

FOSHEIM, Chief Justice (dissenting). The threshold question is whether the trial court had jurisdiction to enter judgment for appellees. It did not. This is an equitable action. However, there is no evidence in the record that findings were waived in the manner required by SDCL 15-6-52(b). This requires remanding the case with direction that the trial court enter findings, conclusions and judgment based thereo

Alice Robie Resnick, J. {¶ 1} This appeal stems from the denial of a motion to enforce an arbitration clause in certain title insurance policies that were issued by defendant-appellant, Lawyers Title Insurance Corporation, in connection with two residential real estate transactions involving plaintiffs-appellees, Miles and Patricia Henderson. {¶ 2} On May 26, 1999, the Hendersons entered into an agreement

[1] Appellants Robertson and Campbell, along with a third party, owned extensive oil leases in the southern part of Oklahoma. Robertson did banking business with appellee Gilbert Humphries, Jr. On one occasion Robertson told Humphries that he would like to sell the oil and gas leases. Robertson offered Humphries a commission for finding a buyer, but Humphries refused, stating that he would rather have a desired net sales figure set and would then make his money off the buyers. Roberts

21-2019 Bartlett v. Baasiri In the United States Court of Appeals For the Second Circuit August Term, 2022 No. 21-2019 ROBERT BARTLETT, TERREL CHARLES BARTLETT, LINDA JONES, SHAWN BARTLETT, MAXINE E. CROCKETT, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF RICKY LEON CROCKETT, MARVISE L. CROCKETT, TRACIE ARSIAGA, INDIVIDUALLY AND ON BEHALF OF THE ESTATE OF ROBERT R. ARSIAG

Alice Robie Resnick, J., dissenting. The matter before this court involves an underlying action for declaratory judgment filéd in the Franklin County Common Pleas Court seeking a determination as to the constitutionality of R.C. 4909.42. Relator requests a writ of prohibition, contending that the common pleas court lacks jurisdiction. Specifically, relator asserts that since this matter involves the issue of utility rates, it fall

McKEOWN, Circuit Judge. This case arose from the bloody aftermath of a robbery in the Newbury Park neighborhood of Los Angeles. After police surrounded the getaway car, the two robbers, Robert Cunningham and Daniel Soly, exchanged gunfire with the police. Soly died and Cunningham was seriously injured. Cunningham was later tried and convicted of, among other things, murdering Soly by provoking the police to shoot. Soly’s p

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER T. JOHN WARD, District Judge. Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. No. 179), Plaintiffs’ Supplemental Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. No. 194), and Plaintiffs Second Supplemental Motion for Class Certification (Dkt. No. 213). In the motions, the named plaintiffs (“Plaintiffs”) seek certification of a class of motorists an

390 S.W.2d 385 (1965) BILLY BAKER MOBILE HOMES, INC., Appellant, v. Gid FOSTER, Appellee. No. 11291. Court of Civil Appeals of Texas. Austin. April 28, 1965. *386 Smith, Rose & Finley, San Angelo, for appellant. Marvin C. Hanz, San Angelo, for appellee. ARCHER, Chief Justice. This is a suit for damages ba

267 So.2d 8 (1972) Earnest Eugene ANDERSON et al., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. 42789. Supreme Court of Florida. September 8, 1972. Rehearing Denied October 19, 1972. *9 Robert L. Shevin, Atty. Gen., Wallace E. Allbritton, Raymond L. Marky, W.E. Whitlock, III, Richard W. Prospect, Donald K. Rudse

947 F.Supp. 491 (1996) WALCO INVESTMENTS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kenneth THENEN, et al., Defendants. No. 93-2534-CIV. United States District Court, S.D. Florida. October 23, 1996. Harley S. Tropin, Miami, FL, Receiver for Premium Sales Corp. Marc Cooper, Cooper & Wolfe, P.A., Miami, FL, for the Receiver. David Berger, Stephen Whinston, Berger

16 Cal.App.3d 651 (1971) 94 Cal. Rptr. 216 PRODUCT RESEARCH ASSOCIATES, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. PACIFIC TELEPHONE & TELEGRAPH COMPANY, Defendant and Respondent. Docket No. 26223. Court of Appeals of California, First District, Division One. April 14, 1971. *653 COUNSEL Lewis, Rouda & Win

OPINION David Puryear, Justice In three separate lawsuits, several hundred individuals sued Asplundh Tree Expert Co. (“Asplundh”) seeking damages stemming from the devastating 2011 Bas-trop County Complex Fire. In response, Asplundh filed a motion for summary judgment asserting that the suits were untimely because they were filed past the two-year statute of limitations. After convening a hearing on the moti

PROST, Circuit Judge. This is a military pay class action case brought on behalf of officers of the United States Air Force terminated pursuant to a 1993 Reduction in Force (“RIF”). The basis of their complaint is that the formal instructions governing selection for involuntary termination required different treatment of officers based on their race or gender, thereby violating the equal protection guarantee of the Fifth Amen

20 F.Supp.2d 1017 (1998) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. James M. THOMPSON, Plaintiff, v. COLUMBIA/HCA HEALTHCARE CORPORATION, CHC Holdings, Inc., Columbia Hospital Corporation of Bay Area, Columbia Hospital Corporation of Corpus Christi, Corpus Christi Bay Area Surgery, Ltd., and Columbia Surgicare Specialty Hospital, Defendants. Civil Action No. C-95-110. United States District Court, S.D. Texas, Co