Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “MARY CARTER”
David Carter v. Mary Carter;public domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-CP-01198-COA DAVID CARTER APPELLANT v. MARY CARTER APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 07/22/2019 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. ALBERT B. SMITH III COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: COAHOMA COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT ATTORN
Raymond Watison v. Mary Carterpublic domain
Opinion by Judge FARRIS; Partial Concurrence and Partial Dissent by Judge NOONAN. OPINION FARRIS, Senior Circuit Judge: Petitioner Raymond Watison, who is serving a sentence in Nevada State Prison, sued defendant prison officials under 42 *1112U.S.C. § 1983 pro se, alleging that they violated several of his rights
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed October 5, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-21-00277-CV SHAWN GREEN AND AZTEC PORTACANS & CONTAINERS, LTD., Appellants V. MARY CARTER MORRIS, Appellee On Appeal from the 234th District Court
Order filed September 9, 2021 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals ____________ NO. 14-21-00277-CV ____________ SHAWN GREEN AND AZTEC PORTACANS & CONTAINERS, LTD., Appellants V. MARY CARTER MORRIS, Appellee On Appeal from th
David Carter v. Mary A. Carterpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2020-CP-00439-COA DAVID CARTER APPELLANT v. MARY A. CARTER APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 04/20/2020 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. WILLIE JAMES PERKINS SR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: COAHOMA COUNTY CHANCERY COURT
Andrew William Eckerd v. Mary Ellen Carterpublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, August 21, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A25D0016. ANDREW WILLIAM ECKERD v. MARY ELLEN CARTER. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: CE2301382 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Andrew William Eckerd v. Mary Ellen Carterpublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, August 21, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A25D0017. ANDREW WILLIAM ECKERD v. MARY ELLEN CARTER. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: CE2301382 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Andrew William Eckerd v. Mary Ellen Carterpublic domain
Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia ATLANTA, May 15, 2024 The Court of Appeals hereby passes the following order A24D0341. ANDREW WILLIAM ECKERD v. MARY ELLEN CARTER. Upon consideration of the Application for Discretionary Appeal, it is ordered that it be hereby DENIED. LC NUMBERS: CE2301382 Court of Appeals of the State of Georgia
Sean Carter McCain v. Elizabeth Mary McCainpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED OCTOBER 28, 2021 NO. 03-19-00751-CV Sean Carter McCain, Appellant v. Elizabeth Mary McCain, Appellee APPEAL FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE BYRNE, JUSTICES BAKER AND KELLY
Sean Carter McCain v. Elizabeth Mary McCainpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00751-CV Sean Carter McCain, Appellant v. Elizabeth Mary McCain, Appellee FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-FM-15-004553, THE HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING OPINIO
Sean Carter McCain v. Elizabeth Mary McCainpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-19-00751-CV Sean Carter McCain, Appellant v. Elizabeth Mary McCain, Appellee FROM THE 201ST DISTRICT COURT OF TRAVIS COUNTY NO. D-1-FM-15-004553, THE HONORABLE LORA J. LIVINGSTON, JUDGE PRESIDING ORDER PER CURIAM
Bryan Reichel v. Mary Jo A. Jensen-Carterpublic domain
United States Bankruptcy Appellate Panel For the Eighth Circuit ___________________________ No. 22-6004 ___________________________ In re: Bryan S. Reichel, as surety for Rudy, Inc., as surety for Pure Choice, Inc., formerly doing business as America's Team Properties Debtor -------------
Mary L. Carter v. Gwendolyn Glennpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN JUDGMENT RENDERED DECEMBER 31, 2014 NO. 03-13-00110-CV Mary L. Carter, Appellant v. Gwendolyn Glenn, Appellee APPEAL FROM 169TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY BEFORE CHIEF JUSTICE JONES, JUSTICES PEMBERTON AND FIELD REVERSED AND
Mary L. Carter v. Gwendolyn Glennpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00110-CV Mary L. Carter, Appellant v. Gwendolyn Glenn, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 169TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 229,626, HONORABLE GORDON G. ADAMS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Mary L. Carter v. Gwendolyn Glennpublic domain
TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-13-00110-CV Mary L. Carter, Appellant v. Gwendolyn Glenn, Appellee FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, 169TH JUDICIAL DISTRICT NO. 229,626, HONORABLE GORDON G. ADAMS, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION
Carter v. Cooperpublic domain
PER CURIAM: Mary Carter appeals the district court’s order dismissing her 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2006) complaint without prejudice under 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) (2006). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the rea*257sons stated by the district court. Carter v. Cooper, No. 5:10-ct-03133-D (E.D.N.C. Feb. 1, 2011). We dis
State v. Carterpublic domain
COHEN, J. The State appeals a nonfinal order granting Constance Carter’s motion to suppress evidence. Carter had moved to suppress her statement recorded by law enforcement, all medical information pertaining to both herself and her son (the victim), and all statements she made to medical personnel at the hospital. Carter successfully argued that the statements and records were private medical records obtained without cons
Andrew Alexander v. Mary Jo Jensen-Carterpublic domain
ARNOLD, Circuit Judge. Georgina Stephens and Andrew Alexander appeal from the decision of the district court 1 affirming an order of the bankruptcy court giving possession of disputed property to John Hedback and Mary Jo Jensen-Carter, trustees of the individual bankruptcy estates of Ms. Stephens and Larry Alexander (Mr
Harper v. Carterpublic domain
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: James Harper, Jr., a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge and denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we grant leave
Mary Carter v. Sea Land Services, Inc.public domain
POLITZ, Circuit Judge: Appealing an adverse judgment rejecting her employment discrimination claims against Sea-Land Services, Inc., Mary Carter also challenges the denial of her motion to withdraw her consent to trial before a magistrate. Finding the consent valid and enforceable, and perceiving neither erroneous findings of fact nor error of law in the decision appealed, we