Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “MARY JANE HARRIS”
CYNTHIA C. HARRIS, ) ) Appellant, ) ) vs. ) Nos. SD35908 & SD35971 ) ALICE DAVIS, as Personal Representative ) FILED: November 4, 2019 of the Estate of Melvin Harris, Deceased, ) CHASITY L. BOETTCHER, ) JANE M. McKNIGHT,
Mary Jane Sitton v. Statepublic domain
Motion Granted; Appeal Dismissed and Memorandum Opinion filed March 14, 2019 In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-01050-CR MARY JANE SITTON, Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, Appellee On Appeal from the County Criminal Court at Law No. 4 Harris County, Texas
Harris v. Fulwoodpublic domain
JUDGMENT PER CURIAM. This appeal was considered on the record from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia and on the briefs of the parties.1 The Court has accorded the issues full consideration and has determined that they do not warrant a *2published opinion. See D.C.Cm. R. 36(d).
Villarreal v. Harris Countypublic domain
226 S.W.3d 537 (2006) Lupe VILLARREAL, Appellant v. HARRIS COUNTY, Texas; Paul Betten-court, Tax-Assessor Collector for Harris County, Texas; Houston Independent School District; City of Houston; and Linebarger, Goggan, Blair & Sampson, L.L.P., Appellees. No. 01-05-00993-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (1st Dist.). December 21, 2006.
Jane Doe No. 1 v. Backpage.Com, LLCpublic domain
SELYA, Circuit Judge. This is a hard case- — hard not in the sense that the legal issues defy resolution, but hard in the sense that the law requires that we, like the court below, deny relief to plaintiffs whose circumstances evoke outrage. The result we must reach is rooted in positive law. Congress addressed the right to publish the speech of others in the Information Age when
Harris v. Transp. Outlet, 2007-L-188 (6-13-2008)public domain
OPINION {¶ 1} Appellant, Cars Warranty, appeals from the October 27, 2007 judgment entry of the Willoughby Municipal Court, which overruled its objections and adopted the magistrate's decision to award appellee, Mr. Andrew Harris, $3,000, plus 8% interest for his car engine replacement. For the following reasons, we affirm. {¶ 2} Substantive Facts and Procedural History
Kerr v. Harris Countypublic domain
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 292 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 293 MEMORANDUM OPINION ON REHEARING Edward A. and Norma Kerr, together with approximately
Harris v. Quinnpublic domain
Justice ALITO delivered the opinion of the Court. This case presents the question whether the First Amendment permits a State to compel personal care providers to subsidize speech on matters of public concern by a union that they do not wish to join or support. We hold that it does not, and we therefore reverse the judgment of the Court of Appeals.
Mary Jane WILSON, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Thomas David MARCHINGTON; Inland Empire Shows, Inc., Defendants-Appellantspublic domain
THOMAS, Circuit Judge. This appeal presents the question of whether, and under what circumstances, a tribal court tort judgment is entitled to recognition in the United States Courts. We conclude that the principles of comity, not fell faith and credit, govern whether a district court should recognize and enforce a tribal court judgment. In this instance, because the tribal cour
Mary Jane Bridgewater v. Robert S. Adamczykpublic domain
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE February 5, 2010 Session MARY JANE BRIDGEWATER v. ROBERT S. ADAMCZYK ET AL. Appeal from the Chancery Court for Smith County No. 6776 C. K. Smith, Chancellor No. M2009-01582-COA-R3-CV - Filed April 1, 2010 This is an appeal from an action to quiet title to thirty acres of property in Smith County.
Robinson v. Estate of Harrispublic domain
388 S.C. 616 (2010) 698 S.E.2d 214 Sara Mae ROBINSON, Mary Ann Campbell, James Scott, Ellis Scott, William Scott, Shirley Pinckney Hughes, Julius Steven Brown, Leon Brown, Annabell Brown, Loretta Ladson, Kathleen Brown, Mozelle B. Rembert, Patricia Frickling, Ruth Mitchell, Gwendolyn Dunn, Angela Hamilton, Geraldine Jameson, Remus Prioleau, Julius Prioleau, Anthony Prioleau, Judy Brown, Franklin Brown, Kathy Young, Kenneth Priolea
Robinson v. Estate of Harrispublic domain
389 S.C. 360 (2010) 698 S.E.2d 801 Sara Mae ROBINSON, Mary Ann Campbell, James Scott, Ellis Scott, William Scott, Shirley Pinckney Hughes, Julius Steven Brown, Leon Brown, Annabell Brown, Loretta Ladson, Kathleen Brown, Mozelle B. Rembert, Patricia Frickling, Ruth Mitchell, Gwendolyn Dunn, Angela Hamilton, Geraldine Jameson, Remus Prioleau, Julius Prioleau, Anthony Prioleau, Judy Brown, Franklin Brown, Kathy Young, Kenneth Priolea
Robinson v. Estate of Harrispublic domain
388 S.C. 630 (2010) 698 S.E.2d 222 Sara Mae ROBINSON, Mary Ann Campbell, James Scott, Ellis Scott, William Scott, Shirley Pinckney Hughes, Julius Steven Brown, Leon Brown, Annabell Brown, Loretta Ladson, Kathleen Brown, Mozelle B. Rembert, Patricia Frickling, Ruth Mitchell, Gwendolyn Dunn, Angela Hamilton, Geraldine Jameson, Remus Prioleau, Julius Prioleau, Anthony Prioleau, Judy Brown, Franklin Brown, Kathy Young, Kenneth Priolea
Robinson v. Estate of Harrispublic domain
391 S.C. 114 (2011) 705 S.E.2d 41 Sara Mae ROBINSON, Mary Ann Campbell, James Scott, Ellis Scott, William Scott, Shirley Pinckney Hughes, Julius Steven Brown, Leon Brown, Annabell Brown, Loretta Ladson, Kathleen Brown, Mozelle B. Rembert, Patricia Frickling, Ruth Mitchell, Gwendolyn Dunn, Angela Hamilton, Geraldine Jameson, Remus Prioleau, Julius Prioleau, Anthony Prioleau, Judy Brown, Franklin Brown, Kathy Young, Kenneth Prioleau
176 S.W.3d 330 (2004) EPGT TEXAS PIPELINE, L.P., Successor to PG & E Texas Pipeline, L.P., Appellant, v. HARRIS COUNTY FLOOD CONTROL DISTRICT, Appellee. No. 01-02-01056-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, First District, Houston. August 12, 2004. Rehearing Overruled September 24, 2004. *333 Jack D. Ballard, Mary J
Robinson v. Estate of Harrispublic domain
388 S.C. 645 (2010) 698 S.E.2d 229 Sara Mae ROBINSON, Mary Ann Campbell, James Scott, Ellis Scott, William Scott, Shirley Pinckney Hughes, Julius Steven Brown, Leon Brown, Annabell Brown, Loretta Ladson, Kathleen Brown, Mozelle B. Rembert, Patricia Frickling, Ruth Mitchell, Gwendolyn Dunn, Angela Hamilton, Geraldine Jameson, Remus Prioleau, Julius Prioleau, Anthony Prioleau, Judy Brown, Franklin Brown, Kathy Young, Kenneth Priolea
Robinson v. Estate of Harrispublic domain
378 S.C. 140 (2008) 662 S.E.2d 420 Sara Mae ROBINSON, Mary Ann Campbell, James Scott, Ellis Scott, William Scott, Shirley Pinckney Hughes, Julius Steven Brown, Leon Brown, Annabell Brown, Loretta Ladson, Kathleen Brown, Mozelle B. Rembert, Patricia Frickling, Ruth Mitchell, Gwendolyn Dunn, Angela Hamilton, Geraldine Jameson, Remus Prioleau, Julius Prioleau, Anthony Prioleau, Judy Brown, Franklin Brown, Kathy Young, Kenneth Priolea
IN RE: JANE DOE vspublic domain
FIFTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 5D23-2754 LT Case No. 2023-DP-000111-A _____________________________ IN RE: JANE DOE, Appellant. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Seminole County. John D. Galluzzo, Judge. Joanna Tolbert, of Central Florida Legal Group, PLLC, Lake Mary, for A
Robinson v. Estate of Harrispublic domain
In Petitioners' quiet title action, they allege the foreclosure of Kathleen and Bobbie Brown's property in 2000 should be set aside for lack of service of process. Since the foreclosure, the property has been transferred several times: in 2002, at a judicial sale to Robert L. Tuttle and Christl Gehring; Gehring later transferred her interest to Tuttle; and in 2003, Tuttle transferred his interest to Respondent Daniel Duggan. In *Page 274 2005, Pet
Mary Jane Nealy v. Southlawn Palms Apartmentspublic domain
Opinion issued June 8, 2006 In The Court of Appeals For The