Cases

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER STIEHL, District Judge. This case is before the Court on the issue of whether the State of Illinois’ Unlawful Use of a Handgun and Aggravated Unlawful Use of a Handgun statutes violate the Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. Under current Illinois law citizens are prohibited from carrying loaded, operable firearms in public. See, 720 ILCS §§ 5/24-l(

MEMORANDUM & OPINION STIEHL, District Judge: This matter is before the Court after the issuance of a mandate of the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit in Moore v. Madigan, 702 F.3d 933 (7th Cir.2012) (Mandate issued July 9, 2013) (Doc. 72). In response to the filing of the mandate (which had been stayed by the Court of Appeals for 210 days) the parties have f

99 S.W.3d 263 (2003) George B. SHEPARD; James C. Mills, Individually and d/b/a MultiMortgage BanCorp; and MultiMortgage BanCorp, Inc., Appellants, v. Elbert G. BOONE, Jr. and Mary Ella Boone, Appellees. No. 11-02-00043-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Eastland. January 23, 2003. *264 Lester Buzbee, III, Humble, for appellant. <

PARKER, Chief Judge. Appellants, John K. Shepard and Peter S. Skemp, appeal the final money judgment and the final cost judgment entered against them in favor of American Plasticraft, Inc., M/N Co., Fred P. Manetti, Quail Hollow Properties, Inc., Mario J. Manetti, and Manetti, Inc. (the Manetti Group), in a contract case involving the purchase and ownership interests in a land trust. We reverse. These two ca

GARY M. GAERTNER, Presiding Judge. Appellant, Mary McGill Shepard, appeals the September 20, 1990, judgment of the Circuit Court of Cape Girardeau County finding in .favor of respondent, Philip McGill, in this suit for breach of contract to pay maintenance. We affirm the judgment of the circuit court. Appellant and respondent were granted a dissolution of marriage on July 19, 1982. On that same day, the part

Blackwell, Justice. Rodney Gordon Shepard was tried by a Clarke County jury and convicted of murder and the unlawful possession of a firearm during the commission of a crime, both in connection with the fatal shooting of David Lumpkin. Following the denial of his motion for new trial, Shepard appeals, contending that the evidence is insufficient to sustain his convictions, that the trial court erred when it denied his motion t

[Cite as State v. Shepard, 2019-Ohio-3995.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS ELEVENTH APPELLATE DISTRICT ASHTABULA COUNTY, OHIO STATE OF OHIO, : OPINION Plaintiff-Appellee, : CASE NO. 2019-A-0024 - vs - : DARRELL A. SHE

ILANA DIAMOND ROVNER, Circuit Judge. Mary Spearman purchased a car from Tom Wood Pontiac-GMC, Inc. (“Tom Wood”), and financed the purchase through the dealership. The Truth in Lending Act (“TILA”) requires that certain information be disclosed to a consum *849 er in writing in a form the consumer ma

ORDER ON PENDING DISCOVERY MOTIONS SIMONTON, United States Magistrate Judge. Presently pending before the Court are the Motion by Non-Parties Armando Gutierrez and Liliana Gutierrez To Quash Subpoena Duces Tecum, Request For Protective Order, and Request For Attorneys’ Fees (DE # 109, filed 4/2/02); Defendants’ Motion To Compel Attendance Of Plaintiffs’ 30(B)(6) Corporate Representative For Dep

POSNER, Circuit Judge. This is a sequel to our decision in Moore v. Madigan, 702 F.3d 933 (7th Cir.2012), which invalidated provisions of the Illinois gun law, 720 ILCS 5/24-1, -1.6, which, with exceptions mainly for police and other security personnel, hunters, and members of target-shooting clubs, prohibited a person from carrying a gun ready to use (loaded, immediately accessible — that is, easy to reach — and unc

Mr. JUSTICE HOPE delivered the opinion of the court: Gregory Shepard was charged by information with the offense of rape (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 11 — 1) and deviate sexual assault (Ill. Rev. Stat. 1977, ch. 38, par. 11 — 3). Upon a jury trial, the defendant was found to be guilty as charged. Judgment was entered on the verdict and the defendant was sentenced to se

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER MARY LOU ROBINSON, District Judge. Before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment, filed on March 9, 2015. In that Motion, Defendants Brenda Vera (“Vera”) and Hansford County (“the County”) request that the Court grant summary judgment in their favor on all of Plaintiffs’ 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims. Plaintiffs filed a response on April 16, 2015, a

William Alsup, United States District Judge *1019INTRODUCTION In these "global warming" actions asserting claims for public nuisance, defendants move to dismiss for failure to state a claim. For the following reasons, the motion is GRANTED . STATEMENT These

OPINION The plaintiff, Mary Irene Shepard (Shepard), appeals from a Superior Court judgment granting the motion for summary judgment of the defendant, Harleysville Worcester Insurance Co., Inc. (Harleysville). This case came before the Supreme Court for oral argument on March 10, 2008, pursuant to an order directing the parties to appear and show cause why the issues raised in this appeal should not summarily be decided. After hearing the parties' arg

235 S.W.3d 163 (2007) PHC-MINDEN, L.P. d/b/a Minden Medical Center, Petitioner, v. KIMBERLY-CLARK CORPORATION, Respondent. No. 05-0823. Supreme Court of Texas. Argued November 16, 2006. Delivered August 31, 2007. *164 R. Brent Cooper, Diana L. Faust, Devon J. Singh, Cooper & Scully, P.C., Dallas, for petition

DECISION Before this Court for decision are cross motions for summary judgment filed by Defendant Harleysville Worcester Insurance Company, Inc. ("Defendant") and Plaintiff Mary Irene Shepard ("Plaintiff").1 This Court has reviewed the evidence and the applicable law, together with the parties' legal memoranda and oral arguments, and now issues this written decision.

BROWN, Judge. [1] In this interlocutory appeal, Mary K. Patehett appeals the trial court’s order granting a motion in limine filed by Ashley N. Lee, and ordering that evidence of payments made by the Healthy Indiana Plan (“HIP”) to reimburse Lee’s medical providers in full satisfaction of Lee’s hospital bills, was barred by the collateral source statute, Ind.Code § 34-44-1-2, an

SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEW YORK Appellate Division, Fourth Judicial Department 822 CAF 13-01441 PRESENT: CENTRA, J.P., FAHEY, LINDLEY, VALENTINO, AND DEJOSEPH, JJ. IN THE MATTER OF CHERYL L. GROSS, PETITIONER-APPELLANT, V MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WADE R. GROSS, RESPONDENT-RESPONDENT. DAVID J. FARRUGIA, PUBLIC DEFENDER, LOCKPORT (MARY-JEAN BOWMAN OF COUNSEL), FOR PETITIONER-APPELLANT. MELISSA A. CAVAGNARO, ATTORNEY FOR

MASSA, J., dissenting. I agree with much of Chief Justice Rush’s dissent, including, perhaps even, her observation that today’s decision is not a catastrophe. Time will tell. But I do believe it has the potential to more than chip away at the rule of law and inflict more serious damage on our Court and state, so I write separately about these concerns. The ruling of the Court will be see

IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE July 20, 2010 Session STATE OF TENNESSEE v. KEVIN E. SHEPARD Direct Appeal from the Circuit Court for Hickman County No. 08-5104CR Timothy Easter, Judge No. M2009-02131-CCA-R3-CD - Filed December 22, 2010 The defendant, Kevin E. Shepard, was convicted after a bench trial of reckless endangerment