Cases

The Defendant is charged with the crime of robbery. Robbery is the taking and carrying away of property from someone else by force or threat of force with the intent to deprive the victim of the property. To convict the Defendant of robbery, the State must prove that the Defendant took the property from Brian Rampmeyer, that the Defendant took the property by force or threat of force, and that the

Petition for writ of certiorari granted. Transferred to the regular docket as No. 53, Sept. Term, 2018.

KRAUSER, C.J. Before appellant, Barbara Ann Stewart, married appellee, James Edward Stewart, in 1988, she signed a prenuptial1 agreement, prepared by Mr. Stewart’s attorney. In that agreement, she waived any interest she had in certain enumerated items of property owned by Mr. Stewart. Twenty-one years later, Mr. Stewart filed a divorce action in the Circuit Court for Charles County, requesting, a

ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION * IN THE OF MARYLAND * COURT OF APPEALS v. * OF MARYLAND * Misc. Docket AG No. 84 CRAIG

State of Maryland v. Willie B. Stewart No. 53, September Term 2018 Criminal Law – Inconsistent Verdicts. The indictment charged the defendant with robbery, second-degree assault, and theft. The jury returned a guilty verdict on the robbery and theft charges and a not guilty verdict on the second-degree assault charge. The verdicts on the robbery and assault charges were not inconsistent so as to require reversal of the robbery conviction. Circuit Court for Baltimore County

Petition for writ of certiorari dismissed.

* IN THE ATTORNEY GRIEVANCE COMMISSION OF MARYLAND * SUPREME COURT * OF MARYLAND v. * AG No. 40 CRAIG W. STEWART * September Term, 2024 ORDER Up

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: David N. Washington appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Federal Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Acc

BERGER, J. Following a jury trial, appellant Nathaniel Adel Steward Bey (“Stewart-Bey”) was convicted of thirty-two counts of criminal conduct involving counterfeiting checks, issuing counterfeit instruments, theft, and attempted theft by the Circuit Court for Charles County. 1

ORDER The Court having considered the favorable recommendations of the Character Committee for the Fourth Appellate Circuit of Maryland and the State Board of Law Examiners, the Memorandum in Support of the Board of Law Examiners’ Recommendation that Applicant Drew Everett Stewart be Admitted to the Maryland Bar and the oral argument of the applicant’s counsel presented at a hearing held before this Court on January 3, 2013,

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Hiram Lopez appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his complaint filed pursuant to Bivens v. Six Unknown Named Agents of Fed. Bureau of Narcotics, 403 U.S. 388, 91 S.Ct. 1999, 29 L.Ed.2d 619 (1971). We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, although we grant leave to proceed in for-ma pau

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Yahya Siddiqi Abdussamadi, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court.

*234Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Maurice Bernard Stewart, Jr. appeals the district court’s order granting summary judgment to the Appellees. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons state

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge The parties in this employment discrimination case were ordered to address plaintiffs claim arising from her request for reasonable accommodations- for her upper respiratory condition. See Stewart v. White, 61 F.Supp.3d 118, 133-34 (D.D.C. 2014).- Defendant has su

MEMORANDUM OPINION COLLEEN KOLLAR-KOTELLY, United States District Judge Plaintiff, proceeding pro se, sues her former employer, the Securities and Exchange Commission (“SEC”), for alleged violations of the Age Discrimination in Employment Act of 1967 (“ADEA”), 29 U.S.C. § 621 et seq., and the Family Medical Leave Act

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Orlando Foreman, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Foreman v. St

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Keith Bryan Webb-El, a federal prisoner, appeals the district court’s order dismissing without prejudice for lack of jurisdiction his 28 U.S.C. § 2241 (2012) petition. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons sta

MEMORANDUM OPINION DEBORAH K. CHASANOW, District Judge. Presently pending and ready for resolution in this discrimination case is the motion for summary judgment filed by Defendants Morgan State University (“Morgan State”), Dallas R. Evans, Warren Hayman, Martin R. Resnick, T. Joan Robinson, Benjamin Welsh,' and David Wilson. (ECF No. 34). Also pending is Defendant’s motion to strike Plaintiffs opposition to

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Derek L. Simms appeals the district court’s order dismissing his civil action alleging violations of his marriage, disabilities, and religious rights. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the distri

Dismissed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Ronald Nathaniel Stewart seeks to appeal the district court’s orders dismissing as untimely his 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255 (West Supp.2013) motion and denying his Fed. R.Civ.P. 59(e) motion for reconsideration. The orders are not appealable unless a circuit justice or judge