Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
4 opinions for “MCHA Holdings, LLC v. The Republic of Argentina”
NML Capital, Ltd. v. Republic of Argentinapublic domain
OPINION AND ORDER THOMAS P. GRIESA, District Judge. Plaintiffs in these forty-nine actions hold defaulted bonds issued by defendant, the Republic of Argentina. Plaintiffs have already obtained partial summary judgment *517that the Republic violated, and continues to violate, the pari passu clause of the underlying bond agreement
*105SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiffs-Appellants appeal from the opinion and order of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Griesa, J.), vacating the Injunctions against Argentina upon the occurrence of two conditions precedent. We assume the parties’ familiarity with the underlying facts and the procedural history of the case and therefore addre
Attestor Value v. Republic of Argentinapublic domain
16-1124 Attestor Value v. Republic of Argentina UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT _______________ August Term, 2016 (Submitted: November 21, 2016 Decided: October 18, 2019) Docket No. 16‐1124
Arag-A Ltd. v. Republic of Argentinapublic domain
OPINION Thomas P. Griesa, United States District Judge Plaintiffs are a group of holders of defaulted Argentine bonds.1 They claim to *194have entered into binding settlement agreements with the Republic of Argentina on or before February 29, 2016. Plaintiffs believe the Republic must honor these alleged agreements befo