Cases

FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT APRIL 14, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA

434 N.W.2d 577 (1989) WELLS COUNTY WATER RESOURCE DISTRICT, Plaintiff and Appellee, v. Malvin SOLBERG, Delores Larson, Verna and LaVerne Johnson, and John A. Rogness, Defendants and Appellants. Civ. No. 880275. Supreme Court of North Dakota. January 16, 1989. Michael A. Dwyer (argued), Bismarck, for plaintiff and appellee. Chapman & Chapman, Bismarck, for

976 A.2d 1100 (2009) 409 N.J. Super. 282 TOWNSHIP OF READINGTON, a municipal corporation of the State of New Jersey, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. SOLBERG AVIATION CO., a New Jersey partnership, Defendant-Appellant, and John Hromoho; Thor Solberg, Jr.; Waters McPherson McNeill, P.C.; Fox, Rothschild, O'Brien & Frankel, LLP; Thor Solberg Aviation; New Jersey Department of the Treasury, Division of Taxation; and Township

19 Cal.3d 182 (1977) 561 P.2d 1148 137 Cal. Rptr. 460 DIANA D. SOLBERG et al., Petitioners, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Respondents; THE PEOPLE, Real Party in Interest. THE PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. THE MUNICIPAL COURT FOR THE SAN FRANCISCO JUDICIAL DISTRICT OF THE CITY AND COUNTY OF SAN FRANCISCO et al., Defendants and Appellants; DIANA D

OPINION POPOVICH, Chief Judge. This appeal is from an ancillary judgment ordering respondent to pay appellant child support arrearages. Appellant claims her mathematical error in calculation of support obligation led to an erroneous determination of arrearages and requests the ancillary judgment be vacated and amended judgment be entered. We remand for filing of proper motion. FACTS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 17-1605 Filed December 19, 2018 MICHAEL SCOTT WEISS, Applicant-Appellant, vs. STATE OF IOWA, Respondent-Appellee. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Pottawattamie County, James S. Heckerman, Judge. Michael Weiss appeals the denial of his application for postconviction relief.

442 N.W.2d 73 (1989) Cynthia THOMAS, Appellee, v. Diane SOLBERG, Appellant. No. 88-1092. Supreme Court of Iowa. June 14, 1989. Michael J. Coyle and Norman J. Wangberg of Fuerste, Carew, Coyle, Juergens & Sudmeier, P.C., Dubuque, for appellant. T. Todd Becker of the Tom Riley Law Firm, P.C., Cedar Rapids, for appellee. Considered by HARRIS, P.J., an

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER Joan B. Gottsehall, United States District Judge Plaintiff Physicians Healthsource, Inc. (“PHI”), for itself and on behalf of the class it seeks to represent (collectively, “Plaintiffs”), bring this lawsuit against Defendant A-S Medication Solutions, LLC (“A-S”), James Barta, Walter Hoff, and John Does 1-10 (collectively, “Defendants”), alleging violations of the Telephone Cons

532 F.Supp.2d 1006 (2007) Michael LEWIS and Tammy Livingston, Plaintiffs, v. PDV AMERICA, INC., Citgo Petroleum Corporation, and Citgo Lemont Refinery, Defendants. No. 06 C 4314. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. January 30, 2008. *1007 Marios Nicholas Karayannis, Brady & Jensen, Elgin, IL, for Pl

*1282Opinion CAMPBELL, P. J. Statement of the Case On May 25, 1987, the minor was detained on suspicion of burglary. On June 1, 1987, the People, through a probation officer, and the minor, both personally and through his mother, availed themselves of the provisions of Welfare and Institutions Code section 6541

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER HON. JORGE L. ALONSO, United States District Judge Plaintiff alleges that defendants violated the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (“TCPA”) by sending him a fax advertisement, which did not contain an opt-out notice, without his permission or invitation. The case is before the Court on defendant Heska’s motion to stay. For the reasons set forth below, the Court denie

MATTHEW F. KENNELLY, District Judge: Changes in technology have relegated the fax machine to a marginal role virtually everywhere but the courtroom. There, the fax machine reclaims some of its old luster, given its role in lawsuits against defendants alleged to have burdened fax machines and their owners with unwanted ads. Under the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), it is unlawful to fax an "unsolicited advertisement."

Memorandum Opinion and Order Honorable Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge This is a class action lawsuit brought by Plaintiff Practice Management Support Services, Inc. (“Plaintiff’ or “Practice Management”) on behalf of itself and all others similarly situated. R. 1. It seeks damages from Defendants Cirque du Soleil, Inc., Cirque du Soleil (US), Inc., and other as yet unnamed Cirque du Sol

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER ELAINE E. BUCKLO, District Judge. Defendant CITGO Petroleum Corporation (“CITGO”) has filed a motion to strike plaintiff Michael Lewis and Tammy Livingston’s (collectively “plaintiffs”) Rule 26(a)(2) disclosure, or in the alternative to exclude certain expert testimony. During an in-court hearing before this court on April 3, 2007, plaintiffs represented that they would b

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER . John Robert Blakey, Judge Plaintiff Lawrence Brodsky (Plaintiff or Brodsky) claims'that Defendant Humana-Dental Insurance Coiripany (Defendant or HDIC) improperly sent him- two faxes in violation of the Telephone Consumer Protection Act (TCPA), 47 U.S.C. § 227 et seq. This Court previously certified a class of similarly-situated recipients in September 2016. [349] at 2

Honorable Thomas M. Durkin, United States District Judge *844In this class action lawsuit, plaintiff Practice Management Support Services, Inc. challenges the alleged practice of defendants Cirque du Soleil, Inc., and Cirque du Soleil (US), Inc., of using a fax broadcasting service to advertise theatrical shows without providing sufficient instructions about how to opt

COLIN S. BRUCE, U.S. DISTRICT JUDGE Plaintiff, Prairie Rivers Network, filed this citizen enforcement action against Defendant Dynegy Midwest Generation, LLC for violations of the Clean Water Act ("CWA"), 33 U.S.C. §§ 1311 and 1342, at the Vermilion Power Station in Vermilion County, Illinois, on May 30, 2018

612 F.3d 932 (2010) Michael SIEGEL, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. SHELL OIL COMPANY, a Delaware corporation, et al., Defendants-Appellees. No. 09-3451. United States Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit. Argued April 19, 2010. Decided July 30, 2010. *933 Ben Barnow, Barnow & Associates, Larry D. Drury, Chicago, IL, fo

620 F.Supp.2d 899 (2009) Melanie STACEL, Plaintiff, v. TEVA PHARMACEUTICALS, USA, et al., Defendants. No. 08 C 1143. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. March 16, 2009. *901 Michael Peter Cascino, Cascino Vaughan Law Offices, Ltd., Chicago, IL, for Plaintiff. Ameri Rose Giannotti, Pamela Reasor H

ORDER DENYING MOTION TO COMPEL ARBITRATION VINCE CHHABRIA, United States District Judge The first question presented by this motion to compel arbitration is whether the Federal Arbitration Act applies to a contract between a local prosecutor and a criminal suspect about how to address a potential state-law criminal violation. It does not. The second question is whether California law