Cases

ACCEPTED 12-15-00014-CV TWELFTH COURT OF APPEALS TYLER, TEXAS

691 A.2d 1169 (1997) Michael CROWLEY, Sandra Crowley, Appellants, v. NORTH AMERICAN TELECOMMUNICATIONS ASSOCIATION, Matthew J. Boland, Appellees. No. 95-CV-1675. District of Columbia Court of Appeals. Argued November 20, 1996. Decided April 10, 1997. *1171 Frances F. Rogala, Washington, DC, for appellants.

OPINION BY BOWES, J.: This appeal presents novel questions involving a condominium governed by the Unit Property Act (“UPA”), former 68 P.S. § 700.101 et seq. (repealed by 1980, July 2, P.L. 286, No. 82, § 2, effective in 120 days), and the retroactive application of the Uniform Condominium Act (“UCA”), 68 Pa.C.S. § 3101 et seq.

819 F.Supp. 666 (1993) AMES INVESTMENT, INC., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA and Revenue Officer Michael E. Rogala, Defendants. No. 90-72501. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, S.D. April 21, 1993. *667 Mindy L. Hitchcock, Detroit, MI, for plaintiff. Keith V. Morgan, U.S. Dept. of Justice, Washington, DC,

MEMORANDUM OPINION RANDOLPH D. MOSS, United States District Judge In 2013, Lorri Okpara was arrested at her home and detained at a District of Columbia police station for 24 hours. While in police custody, she was twice taken to an area hospital to be treated for diabetes. According to Okpara, during the second of these two trips, the 'Officers who brought

517 F.Supp.2d 954 (2007) JPMORGAN CHASE & CO. f/k/a Bank One Corporation, Plaintiff, v. Sandra E. PIERCE, Defendant. No. 05-CV-74455. United States District Court, E.D. Michigan, Southern Division. July 5, 2007. *955 *956 Daniel D. Quick, Dickinson Wright, Bloomfield Hills, MI, Nicole M. W

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) RONALD PANNELL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Case No. 1:20-cv-518 (CKK/GMH) ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, )

MEMORANDUM EDUARDO C. ROBRENO, District. Judge Presently before the Court is the Thompson Hine Defendants’ motion for summary judgment based upon their argument that Plaintiffs Jones Act claims have abated as there is no statutory beneficiary. For the reasons that follow, the motion ■will be denied. This case was transferred in April of 2011 from the United State District Court for the

517 F.Supp.2d 74 (2007) Emile MAZLOUM, Plaintiff, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA METROPOLITAN POLICE DEPARTMENT, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 06-0002(JDB). United States District Court, District of Columbia. April 17, 2007. *75 *76 Brian H. Corcoran, David J. Gonen, Katten Muchin Rosenman LLP

*368 MEMORANDUM OPINION Emmet G. Sullivan, United States District Court Judge On July 1, 2013, Plaintiff Michael Dickey (“Mr. Dickey”), an employee of the U.S. Department of Transportation (“DOT”), drove his car into the DOT’S parking garage at 1200 New Jersey Ave. SE, Washington, D.

OPINION OF THE COURT SEITZ, Chief Judge. Supreme Auto Parts, Inc. (Supreme) appeals an order of the district court dismissing its counterclaims against Nationwide Mutual Fire Insurance Co. (Nationwide). This court has jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 (1976). I. T & D Cottage Auto Parts & Service, Inc. (T & D) was insured for loss by fire under a policy

705 F.2d 685 NATIONWIDE MUTUAL FIRE INSURANCE COMPANYv.T & D COTTAGE AUTO PARTS AND SERVICE, INC., PartsDistributors, Inc., Kar-Go Parts Center of New Jersey,Citizens United Bank, N.A., Sheriff of Camden County, UnitedStates of America (Internal Revenue Service), De Chester andCompany, Inc., Michael F. Chazkel, Esq., Supreme Auto Parts,Inc., Stanley Novak, and Holstein & Holstein and Co., Inc.,Intervenor-Defe

OPINION OF THE COURT Feuerstein, J. On this appeal we are called upon to determine whether the police, pursuant to a lawful traffic stop, may constitutionally require the driver of the vehicle and all passengers to remain in the vehicle until the traffic stop is concluded. We hold that, upon weighing the minimal degree of the intrusion upon the passengers’ liberty against the significant safety concerns of t

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ADRIAN BOWRIN, Plaintiff, Civil Action No. 23-2421 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA et al., Defendant. MEMORA

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LARTASHA KELLY, Plaintiff v. Civil Action No. 19-23 (CKK) ANTHONY GATON, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION (November 15, 2021) Plaintiff Lartasha Kelly brings this lawsuit against the District of Columbia an

Opinion by JUDGE WEBB ¶ 1 The Denver Juvenile Court found A.B., a juvenile, guilty of possession of a weapon by a previous offender (POWPO), adjudicated him a delinquent, and imposed a sentence of one to two years in the Division of Youth Corrections. On appeal, A.B. contends the court erred in denying his motion to suppress *1119the weapon

THOMPSON, Circuit Judge, dissenting. The insurers’ interpretation of the phrase “care, custody or control,” which the majority has adopted, is certainly rational. However, I am not persuaded that the policy language indisputably supports this interpretation. In my view, the interpretation offered by the defendants is equally (if not more so) rational. Because I think my colleagues got it wrong when they disregar

MEMORANDUM OPINION AMY BERMAN JACKSON, District Judge. In September 2010, plaintiff Robert E. Reiver brought an action against the District of Columbia, the Metropolitan Police Department, Officer Lauren Griffin, Officer Ricardo Edwards, and Lieutenant John Hedgecock, asserting claims arising out of his arrest for driving under the influence and o

753 F.Supp.2d 1092 (2010) Harry J. COLES, Plaintiff, v. Joshua EAGLE, Elton Robertson, Defendants. CIV. No. 09-00167 DAE-BMK. United States District Court, D. Hawaii. November 12, 2010. *1093 Harry J. Coles, Eloy, AZ, pro se. D. Scott Dodd, Office of Corporation Counsel, Honolulu, HI, for Defendants. ORD

RICHARD LEON, United States District Judge This matter is before the Court on Defendants' Motion to Dismiss and for Summary Judgment [Dkt. # 40], filed on behalf of Defendants Michael Hughes and Jeremy Alford. For the reasons that follow, the Court GRANTS the motion. BACKGROUND I. Procedural History Plaintiff Pamela Lyles ("plaintif