Cases

No. 03-238 IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF MONTANA 2004 MT 390 CAROL SNETSINGER, NANCY SIEGEL, CARLA GRAYSON, ADRIANNE NEFF, and PRIDE, INC., A Montana Non-Profit Corporation, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. MONTANA UNIVERSITY SYSTEM, STATE OF MONTANA, RICHARD CROFTS, in his official capacity as Commissioner of Higher Education, and MARGIE THOMPSON, ED JASMIN, LYNN MORRI

747 F.Supp.2d 872 (2010) LITTLE RIVER BAND OF OTTAWA INDIANS, Plaintiff, v. NATIONAL LABOR RELATIONS BOARD, Defendant. Case No. 1:09-cv-141. United States District Court, W.D. Michigan, Southern Division. September 20, 2010. *874 Kaighn Smith, Jr., Drummond Woodsum & MacMahon, Portland, ME, for Plaintiff. Eric G. Mosko

OPINION 1 PER CURIAM: We are asked to delineate the statutory and constitutional limits to the President’s power to control immigration in this appeal of the district court’s order preliminarily enjoining two sections of Executive Order 13780 (“E02” or “the Order”), “Protecting the Nation From Fore

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER JAMES O. BROWNING, District Judge. THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Motion to Dismiss or, in the Alternative, Motion for Summary Judgment Dismissing Complaint in its Entirety, filed March 29, 2013 (Doc. 26)(“MTD & MSJ.”). The Court held a hearing on November 1, 2013. The primary issue is whether the Court will dismiss for failure to state a claim or gr

764 N.E.2d 66 (2001) 327 Ill. App.3d 441 261 Ill.Dec. 775 In re Possession and Control of the COMMISSIONER OF BANKS AND REAL ESTATE of Independent Trust Corporation, a/k/a Intrust, an Illinois Corporate Fiduciary (The Commissioner of Banks and Real Estate; PriceWaterhouseCoopers, LLP, as Receiver of Independent Trust Corporation, a/k/a Intrust, and Millennium Trust Company, LLC, as Successor Trustee, Appell

SECOND DIVISION December 28, 2001 Nos. 1-00-3253, 1-00-4127, 1-00-4128, 1-00-4129,1-00-4130, 1-00-4132, 1-00-4214, 1-00-4260, 1-01-0026,1-01-0246, 1-01-0342, 1-01-0343, 1-01-0344, 1-01-0443,1-01-0444, 1-01-0445, 1-01-0446, 1-01-0487, 1-01-0945,1-01-0986, 1-01-0991, 1-01-0992, 1-01-0993,

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1144 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 1145 OPINION The court below refused to order arbitration despite an arbitration agreement in an insurance

521 F.Supp. 1072 (1981) The UTE INDIAN TRIBE, Plaintiff, v. The STATE OF UTAH, defendant in intervention, Duchesne County, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, Uintah County, a political subdivision of the State of Utah, Roosevelt City, a municipal corporation, and Duchesne City, a municipal corporation, Defendants, United States of America, Amicus Curiae, Paradox Production Corporation, a Utah corporation, Amicus Curiae.

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 857 This is an appeal from a decision of the tax appeal court taken pursuant to the provisions of R.L.H. 1935, § 1950, as amended by Haw. Laws 1939, Act 208, Ser. A-33, § 12. It involves the constitutionality of an assessment levied by the tax commissioner, pursuant to the provisions of the "Hawaii Unemploym

Slip Op. 24-58 UNITED STATES COURT OF INTERNATIONAL TRADE AUXIN SOLAR, INC., AND CONCEPT CLEAN ENERGY, INC., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES; UNITED STATES Before: Timothy M. Reif, Judge DEPARTMENT OF COMMERCE; GINA M. RAIMONDO, SECRETARY OF Court No. 23-00274 COMMERCE; UNITED STATES CUSTOMS AND BORDER PROTEC

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 122–180 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 600 U. S. Part 1 Pages 122–180 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 27, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

48 F.Supp.2d 1257 (1998) Timothy W. SCHMIDT, Plaintiff, v. RHONE-POULENC, INC., Defendant. No. CV-96-033-BU. United States District Court, D. Montana, Butte Division. April 28, 1998. *1258 Bernard J. Everett, Knight, Dahood, McLean, Everett & Dayton, Anaconda, Paul M. Warren, Warren Law Office, Billings, MT, for Timothy W. Sc

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT ________________ Nos. 24-2210 & 24-2211 ________________ In re: WHITTAKER CLARK & DANIELS INC, Debtor PETER PROTOPAPAS, Appellant in No. 24-2210 OFFICIAL COMMITTEE OF TALC CLAIMANTS Appellant in No. 24-2211 ____________

(Slip Opinion) OCTOBER TERM, 2022 1 Syllabus NOTE: Where it is feasible, a syllabus (headnote) will be released, as is being done in connection with this case, at the time the opinion is issued. The syllabus constitutes no part of the opinion of the Court but has been prepared by the Reporter of Decisions for the convenience of the reader. See United States v. Detroit

PRELIMINARY PRINT Volume 599 U. S. Part 1 Pages 255–381 OFFICIAL REPORTS OF THE SUPREME COURT June 15, 2023 Page Proof Pending Publication REBECCA A. WOMELDORF reporter of decisions NOTICE: This preliminary print is subject to formal revision before the bound volume is published. Users are requ

Illinois Official Reports Digitally signed by Reporter of Decisions Reason: I attest to the accuracy and integrity of

12-2335-cv(L) Windsor v. United States 1 2 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS 3 4 FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT 5 6 August Term, 2012 7 8 9 (Argued: September 27, 2012 Decided: October 18, 2012) 10 11 Docket No. 12-2335-cv(L); 12-2435(Con) 12 13 - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -x 14 15 EDITH SCHLAIN WINDSOR, IN HER OFFICIAL CAPACITY AS EXECUTOR 16 OF THE ESTATE OF