Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “MOORE v. MANSFIELD”
Mansfield v. Moorepublic domain
PER CURIAM. Natone Mansfield petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, asserting ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The petition is denied on authority of Manka v. State, 720 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), and Jones v. State, 484 So.2d 577 (Fla.1986). Petition denied.
Stelzel v. Mansfieldpublic domain
MICHEL, Chief Judge. Kenneth E. Stelzel appeals from the final decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“CAVC”) holding that the Veterans Administration (“VA”) committed no clear and unmistakable error (“CUE”) in its 1965 decision regarding Stelzel’s disability rating. See Stelzel v. Nicholson, No. 2005-2871, 2006 WL 3007051, 21 Ve
Mlechick v. Mansfieldpublic domain
MOORE, Circuit Judge. Gordon H. Mansfield, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary), appeals the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) to remand to the Board of Veterans Affairs (Board) for consideration of whether Mlechick was given proper notice under the Veterans Claims Assistance Act (VCAA), Pub.L. No. 102-40, 114 Stat. 2
Moore v. Mansfieldpublic domain
Crosby, J. This bill in equity is brought to "recover the sum of $1,244.14, delivered by the plaintiff’s deceased wife to the defendant and claimed by the plaintiff as his property. The suit was heard by a judge of the Superior Court who found for the plaintiff, and a final decree has been entered ordering the defendant to repay to the plaintiff the amount with interest and costs. The evidence was taken by a commissioner and is a
02-11-365-CV COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00365-CV TRISUN HEALTHCARE, LLC D/B/A APPELLANT THE PLAZA AT MANSFIELD V. GINA KAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS APPELLEES REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TAMSEY LYNORA MOORE, DECEASED
Boyer v. City of Mansfieldpublic domain
3 F.Supp.2d 843 (1998) Jayson S. BOYER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MANSFIELD, et al., Defendants. No. 1:97-CV-704. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. April 21, 1998. *844 *845 Robert Goldberger, Mansfield, OH, Zach Zunshine, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff. Richard P. God
Steward v. Moorepublic domain
(2008) Bruce A. STEWARD, Petitioner, v. Ernie MOORE, Warden, Respondent. No. 1:05CV551. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 26, 2008. OPINION & ORDER KATHLEEN McDONALD O'MALLEY, District Judge. On February 10, 2005 Petitioner, Bruce A. Steward ("Steward" or "Petitioner"), filed a petition for a writ of habeas
Lee Moore v. Betty Mitchellpublic domain
*811MERRITT, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I dissent from the court’s ruling on Petitioner Moore’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim arising from the testimony of Dr. Chiappone, discussed under the heading “Claim (2)(B)” of the majority opinion. The majority opinion asserts that this Court is faced with a “novel question stemming fro
Moore v. Mansfieldpublic domain
Holmes, C. J. This is a bill to reach and apply the proceeds of a judgment recovered by the defendant Mansfield to the payment of a debt alleged to be due to the plaintiff for use and occupation. The bill was dismissed by the Chief Justice of the Superior Court, and the facts found by him were reported under the statute, substantially as follows: The defendant hired of the plaintiff an entire house by a paroi lease, and took po
Moore v. Rice-Land Lumber Co.public domain
EZELL, Judge. []This case involves the application of Louisiana’s Recreational Use Immunity Statutes in dismissing Christy Moore’s claim for damages for the death of her husband who was shot while hunting. Christy argues that, even though Defendants fall within the protective provisions of the recreational use statutes, they agreed by the terms of a hunting license agreement to add certain safety obligations and requirements s
State v. Mansfieldpublic domain
GARRETT, J. [Jn this out-of-time appeal,- the defendant, Orlando Mansfield, contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor’s repeated Doyle1 Violations during, his cross-examination in his jury trial held in 2013. For the reasons expressed below, we remand the matter to the trial court for a contradictory hearing at which-the ineffective assistance claim c
Deans v. Mansfieldpublic domain
STEELMAN, Judge. Where evidence presented at the summary judgment hearing revealed that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether a prescriptive easement had been established in 1972 over the property of defendants, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendants. I. Factual and Procedural Background This action concerns a dispute regarding the use
Deans v. Mansfieldpublic domain
707 S.E.2d 658 (2011) Thomas S. DEANS and wife Yvonne G. Deans, Plaintiffs, v. Linda Simmons MANSFIELD, Johnny DiPiazza, Peter C. Mace, Joanne F. Mace, Hayek Farms, LLC, Jonathan C. Hescock, Patricia N. Hescock, Grande Pines Homeowners' Association, Inc., James A. Jones, Elizabeth B. Jones, MNM Land, LLC, Marc Massaux, Scott F. Brewton, Sonja R. Brewton, Ronald Wall, Barbara Wall, Dirck Andrew Yow, Mary Elizabeth Yow, Grande Pines, LLC, Defendant
Moore v. Statepublic domain
999 S.W.2d 385 (1999) Johnathan MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. No. 72638. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. April 21, 1999. Rehearing Denied October 6, 1999. *391 Julie B. Pollock, San Antonio, for appellant. Barbara Hervey, Assist. DA, San Antonio, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for the
Moore v. Statepublic domain
969 S.W.2d 4 (1998) Frank MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. No. 72543. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. June 10, 1998. *6 Vincent D. Callahan, San Antonio, for appellant. Angela Moore, Assistant District Attorney, San Antonio, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for the State. Before the court
Pilgrim's Pride Corporation v. Judy Mansfieldpublic domain
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00518-CV ____________________ PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION, Appellant V. JUDY MANSFIELD, Appellee _____________________________________________________
moore v. northcountry federalpublic domain
Vermont Superior Court Filed 03/28 24 Chittenden nit VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CHI'ITENDEN UNIT CIVIL DIVISION DUSTIN
Rush v. City of Mansfieldpublic domain
771 F.Supp.2d 827 (2011) Jacob RUSH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MANSFIELD, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:07-CV-1068. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. February 11, 2011. *831 Alphonse A. Gerhardstein, Andrea L. Reino, Gerhardstein & Branch, Cincinnati, OH, David B. Malik, Chesterland, OH, for Pla
Mansfield v. Statepublic domain
911 So.2d 1160 (2005) Scott MANSFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. SC03-1352. Supreme Court of Florida. July 7, 2005. Rehearing Denied September 15, 2005. *1164 Bill Jennings, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Eric Pinkard, David R. Gemmer, and James L. Driscoll, Jr., Assistant CCRC's Middle