⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “MOORE v. MANSFIELD”

Mansfield v. Moorepublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999-10-06 · Published · cited 0× · 741 So. 2d 1256; 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 13186; 1999 WL 791546
PER CURIAM. Natone Mansfield petitions for a writ of habeas corpus, asserting ineffective assistance of appellate counsel. The petition is denied on authority of Manka v. State, 720 So.2d 1109 (Fla. 4th DCA 1998), and Jones v. State, 484 So.2d 577 (Fla.1986). Petition denied.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007-11-15 · Published · cited 1× · 508 F.3d 1345; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 26459; 2007 WL 3377235
MICHEL, Chief Judge. Kenneth E. Stelzel appeals from the final decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (“CAVC”) holding that the Veterans Administration (“VA”) committed no clear and unmistakable error (“CUE”) in its 1965 decision regarding Stelzel’s disability rating. See Stelzel v. Nicholson, No. 2005-2871, 2006 WL 3007051, 21 Ve
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007-10-04 · Published · cited 1× · 503 F.3d 1340; 2007 U.S. App. LEXIS 23254; 2007 WL 2874091
MOORE, Circuit Judge. Gordon H. Mansfield, Acting Secretary of Veterans Affairs (Secretary), appeals the decision of the United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims (Veterans Court) to remand to the Board of Veterans Affairs (Board) for consideration of whether Mlechick was given proper notice under the Veterans Claims Assistance Act (VCAA), Pub.L. No. 102-40, 114 Stat. 2
Moore v. Mansfieldpublic domain
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924-02-28 · Published · cited 15× · 248 Mass. 210
Crosby, J. This bill in equity is brought to "recover the sum of $1,244.14, delivered by the plaintiff’s deceased wife to the defendant and claimed by the plaintiff as his property. The suit was heard by a judge of the Superior Court who found for the plaintiff, and a final decree has been entered ordering the defendant to repay to the plaintiff the amount with interest and costs. The evidence was taken by a commissioner and is a
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2012-02-16 · Published · cited 0×
02-11-365-CV COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH
Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth) · 2012-02-16 · Published · cited 0×
COURT OF APPEALS SECOND DISTRICT OF TEXAS FORT WORTH NO. 02-11-00365-CV TRISUN HEALTHCARE, LLC D/B/A APPELLANT THE PLAZA AT MANSFIELD V. GINA KAY, INDIVIDUALLY AND AS APPELLEES REPRESENTATIVE OF THE ESTATE OF TAMSEY LYNORA MOORE, DECEASED
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 1998-04-21 · Published · cited 3× · 3 F. Supp. 2d 843; 1998 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 19783; 1998 WL 199066
3 F.Supp.2d 843 (1998) Jayson S. BOYER, Plaintiff, v. CITY OF MANSFIELD, et al., Defendants. No. 1:97-CV-704. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. April 21, 1998. *844 *845 Robert Goldberger, Mansfield, OH, Zach Zunshine, Columbus, OH, for Plaintiff. Richard P. God
Steward v. Moorepublic domain
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2008-03-26 · Published · cited 10× · 555 F. Supp. 2d 858; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23964; 2008 WL 817070
(2008) Bruce A. STEWARD, Petitioner, v. Ernie MOORE, Warden, Respondent. No. 1:05CV551. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. March 26, 2008. OPINION & ORDER KATHLEEN McDONALD O'MALLEY, District Judge. On February 10, 2005 Petitioner, Bruce A. Steward ("Steward" or "Petitioner"), filed a petition for a writ of habeas
Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013-02-26 · Published · cited 316× · 708 F.3d 760; 2013 U.S. App. LEXIS 3915; 2013 WL 673524
*811MERRITT, Circuit Judge, dissenting. I dissent from the court’s ruling on Petitioner Moore’s ineffective assistance of counsel claim arising from the testimony of Dr. Chiappone, discussed under the heading “Claim (2)(B)” of the majority opinion. The majority opinion asserts that this Court is faced with a “novel question stemming fro
Moore v. Mansfieldpublic domain
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1902-11-25 · Published · cited 4× · 182 Mass. 302; 65 N.E. 398; 1902 Mass. LEXIS 1020
Holmes, C. J. This is a bill to reach and apply the proceeds of a judgment recovered by the defendant Mansfield to the payment of a debt alleged to be due to the plaintiff for use and occupation. The bill was dismissed by the Chief Justice of the Superior Court, and the facts found by him were reported under the statute, substantially as follows: The defendant hired of the plaintiff an entire house by a paroi lease, and took po
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014-11-05 · Published · cited 1× · 150 So. 3d 657; 14 La.App. 3 Cir. 500; 2014 La. App. LEXIS 2680; 2014 WL 5671852
EZELL, Judge. []This case involves the application of Louisiana’s Recreational Use Immunity Statutes in dismissing Christy Moore’s claim for damages for the death of her husband who was shot while hunting. Christy argues that, even though Defendants fall within the protective provisions of the recreational use statutes, they agreed by the terms of a hunting license agreement to add certain safety obligations and requirements s
State v. Mansfieldpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2016-02-24 · Published · cited 4× · 190 So. 3d 322; 2016 La. App. LEXIS 327; 2016 WL 733177
GARRETT, J. [Jn this out-of-time appeal,- the defendant, Orlando Mansfield, contends that his trial counsel was ineffective for failing to object to the prosecutor’s repeated Doyle1 Violations during, his cross-examination in his jury trial held in 2013. For the reasons expressed below, we remand the matter to the trial court for a contradictory hearing at which-the ineffective assistance claim c
Deans v. Mansfieldpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011-07-01 · Published · cited 0× · 210 N.C. App. 222
STEELMAN, Judge. Where evidence presented at the summary judgment hearing revealed that there was a genuine issue of material fact as to whether a prescriptive easement had been established in 1972 over the property of defendants, the trial court erred in granting summary judgment in favor of defendants. I. Factual and Procedural Background This action concerns a dispute regarding the use
Deans v. Mansfieldpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2011-03-01 · Published · cited 6× · 707 S.E.2d 658; 210 N.C. App. 222; 2011 N.C. App. LEXIS 336
707 S.E.2d 658 (2011) Thomas S. DEANS and wife Yvonne G. Deans, Plaintiffs, v. Linda Simmons MANSFIELD, Johnny DiPiazza, Peter C. Mace, Joanne F. Mace, Hayek Farms, LLC, Jonathan C. Hescock, Patricia N. Hescock, Grande Pines Homeowners' Association, Inc., James A. Jones, Elizabeth B. Jones, MNM Land, LLC, Marc Massaux, Scott F. Brewton, Sonja R. Brewton, Ronald Wall, Barbara Wall, Dirck Andrew Yow, Mary Elizabeth Yow, Grande Pines, LLC, Defendant
Moore v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1999-04-21 · Published · cited 685× · 999 S.W.2d 385; 1999 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 35; 1999 WL 233918
999 S.W.2d 385 (1999) Johnathan MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. No. 72638. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas. April 21, 1999. Rehearing Denied October 6, 1999. *391 Julie B. Pollock, San Antonio, for appellant. Barbara Hervey, Assist. DA, San Antonio, Matthew Paul, State's Atty., Austin, for the
Moore v. Statepublic domain
Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1998-06-10 · Published · cited 700× · 969 S.W.2d 4; 1998 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 75; 1998 WL 300949
969 S.W.2d 4 (1998) Frank MOORE, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas. No. 72543. Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, En Banc. June 10, 1998. *6 Vincent D. Callahan, San Antonio, for appellant. Angela Moore, Assistant District Attorney, San Antonio, Matthew Paul, State's Attorney, Austin, for the State. Before the court
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont) · 2015-02-26 · Published · cited 0×
In The Court of Appeals Ninth District of Texas at Beaumont ____________________ NO. 09-13-00518-CV ____________________ PILGRIM’S PRIDE CORPORATION, Appellant V. JUDY MANSFIELD, Appellee _____________________________________________________
Vermont Superior Court · 2024-04-10 · Published · cited 0×
Vermont Superior Court Filed 03/28 24 Chittenden nit VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CHI'ITENDEN UNIT CIVIL DIVISION DUSTIN
District Court, N.D. Ohio · 2011-02-11 · Published · cited 19× · 771 F. Supp. 2d 827; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 13689; 2011 WL 609802
771 F.Supp.2d 827 (2011) Jacob RUSH, et al., Plaintiffs, v. CITY OF MANSFIELD, et al., Defendants. Case No. 1:07-CV-1068. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. February 11, 2011. *831 Alphonse A. Gerhardstein, Andrea L. Reino, Gerhardstein & Branch, Cincinnati, OH, David B. Malik, Chesterland, OH, for Pla
Mansfield v. Statepublic domain
Supreme Court of Florida · 2005-07-07 · Published · cited 41× · 911 So. 2d 1160; 2005 WL 1577910
911 So.2d 1160 (2005) Scott MANSFIELD, Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee. No. SC03-1352. Supreme Court of Florida. July 7, 2005. Rehearing Denied September 15, 2005. *1164 Bill Jennings, Capital Collateral Regional Counsel, Eric Pinkard, David R. Gemmer, and James L. Driscoll, Jr., Assistant CCRC's Middle