Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “MORSELL v. SYMANTEC CORPORATION”
Morsell v. Symantec Corporationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. : LORI MORSELL, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 12-800 (RC) : v. : : Re Document Nos.: 377, 381 GEN DIGITAL, INC.
Morsell v. Symantec Corporationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. : LORI MORSELL, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 12-800 (RC) : v. : : Re Document Nos.: 364, 365 GEN DIGITAL, INC.
Morsell v. Symantec Corporationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. : LORI MORSELL, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 12-800 (RC) : v. :
Morsell v. Symantec Corporationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : ex rel. LORI MORSELL, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 12-800 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 280, 283
Morsell v. Symantec Corporationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : ex rel. LORI MORSELL, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 12-800 (RC) : v. : Re Documents Nos.: 105, 118, 124
Morsell v. Symantec Corporationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA UNITED STATES OF AMERICA : ex rel. LORI MORSELL, et al., : : Plaintiffs, : Civil Action No.: 12-800 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 200
United States Ex Rel. Morsell v. Symantec Corp.public domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge Granting in Part and Denying in Part Dependant’s Motion to Dismiss; Denying the United States’ Motion for Partial Summary Judgment I. INTRODUCTION In the course óf her work at Symantec Corporation, Lori Morsell came to believe
Riedel v. Boston Heart Diagnostics Corporationpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA ____________________________________ ) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA ex rel. ) CHRIS RIEDEL, ) ) Plaintiff, ) ) v. ) Civil Action No. 12-1423 (RBW) ) BOSTON HEART DI
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA FEDERAL DEPOSIT INSURANCE COROPORATION, Plaintiff/Counterclaim Defendant, Civil Action No. 17-cv-36-LLA-MAU v. BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Defendant/Counterclaim Plaintiff. MEMORANDUM OPINION1 After the 2008 financial
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA INOVA HEALTH CARE SERVICES, FOR INOVA FAIRFAX HOSPITAL AND ITS DEPARTMENT, LIFE WITH CANCER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Civil Action No. 20-784 (JDB) OMNI SHOREHAM CORP., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION This case arises from a contract between plaintiffs—Inova Heal
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE INSTITUTE OF MULTIDIMENSIONAL MEDICINE, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 22-1308 (JEB) METAGENICS, INC., Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION Amid the upheaval of the COVID-19 pandemic, businesses made changes to adapt to new circumstances. In this suit, Plaintiff T
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA COLORADO WILD PUBLIC LANDS, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-cv-2802 (CRC) UNITED STATES FOREST SERVICE, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER After weeks of negotiations, Plaintiff Colorado Wild Public Lands (“COWPL”) and Defendant United States For
Montgomery v. McDonoughpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA DYTAUN MONTGOMERY, : : Plaintiff, : : v. : Civil Action No.: 22-1715 (RC) : DENIS MCDONOUGH,
Smith v. Rubicon Advisors, LLCpublic domain
MEMORANDUM OPINION Denying Defendant’s Partial Motion to Dismiss RUDOLPH CONTRERAS, United States District Judge I. INTRODUCTION Plaintiff Todd W. Smith formerly worked as a lobbyist for Defendant Rubi *247 con Advisors, LLC.
Miller Legal LLP v. Millerpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA Miller Legal, LLP, d/b/a Banner Legal, : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 18-1007 (RC) : v. : Re Document No.: 23 : Peter Miller and Miller DellaFera,
McDowell v. Cgi Group, Inc.public domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA LORI McDOWELL, on behalf of herself and similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. CGI FEDERAL INC., and Civil Action No. 15-1157 (GK) DOES 1through100, inclusive Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Plaintiff, Lori McDowell, alleges that her personal infor
Arsanjani v. United States of Americapublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA MAHTAB ARSANJANI, Plaintiff, v. Civil Action No. 19-1746 (JEB) UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION A large American elm tree sits at the corner of 9th St. and Constitution Ave., NW, on the grounds of the Smithsonian’s National Museu
Depu v. Yahoo! Inc.public domain
JOHN D. BATES, United States District Judge *185China's vast censorship of speech on the Internet has been widely reported, as has the Chinese government's detention and imprisonment of many of its citizens for expressing political views online. Plaintiffs are seven Chinese citizens who allege that they were imprisoned in China for online speech, and the wife of another
Matiella v. Murdock Street LLCpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CHARLES MATIELLA, Plaintiff, v. Case No. 21-cv-2112 (GMH) MURDOCK STREET LLC, et al., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER In this case, Plaintiff Charles Matiella alleges that the construction of a multi-unit
Beach Tv Properties Inc. v. Solomanpublic domain
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA THE ATLANTA CHANNEL, INC., : : Plaintiff, : Civil Action No.: 15-1823 (RC) : v. : Re Document Nos.: 145, 150, 155