Cases

ORDER DENYING DEFENDANT’S MOTION TO DENY CLASS CERTIFICATION HON. GONZALO P. CURIEL, United States District Judge Before the Court is Defendant’s motion to deny class certification filed on May 19, 2017. (Dkt. No. 58.) Plaintiffs filed an opposition on June 16, 2017. (Dkt. No. 103.) On June 30, 2017, Defendant filed a reply. (Dkt. No. 105.) After a review of the briefs, the applicable law and supporting d

TERRENCE G. BERG, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE I. Introduction Plaintiffs in this proposed putative class action allege that Defendant FCA's 2007-2012 Dodge Ram 2500 and 3500 diesel trucks (the "Trucks" or "Affected Vehicles"), equipped with 6.7-liter Turbo Diesel engines manufactured by Defendant Cummins Inc., emit nitrogen oxides ("NOx") at levels in excess of federal and state emissions standards

DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge Defendant FCA US LLC has filed a fourth motion to dismiss under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b). This one is aimed at the second amended consolidated master class action complaint (SACMC) in this multidistrict litigation proceeding, and *588it is based on Rule 12(b)(6). The parties agreed to s

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION TO DISMISS ALLEGING FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM DAVID M. LAWSON, United States District Judge This is the third motion to dismiss filed by the defendant under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 12(b) aimed at the first amended consolidated master class action complaint (FACMC) in this multidistrict litigation

TRANSFER ORDER Sarah S. Vance, Chair Before the Panel:* Plaintiff in one action in the Eastern District of Michigan moves under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to centralize this litigation in that district. This litigation currently consists of six actions pending in' four districts, as listed on Schedule A. Since the filing of the motion, the Panel has been notified of seven related federa

PRECEDENTIAL UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE THIRD CIRCUIT _____________ No. 21-2472 _____________ CHARLES MACK, Appellant v. JOHN YOST, Warden; TIM KUHN, Associate Warden; JEFFREY STEPHENS, Trust Fund Officer; SAMUEL VENSLOSKY, Correctional officer, sued in their individual capacities; DOUG ROBERTS

In the United States Court of Appeals For the Seventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21‐2792 YVONNE MACK, Plaintiff‐Appellant, v. RESURGENT CAPITAL SERVICES, L.P. and LVNV FUNDING, LLC, Defendants‐Appellees. ____________________ Appeal from the United States Dis

ORDER PAUL G. BYRON, District Judge. This cause comes before the Court on Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss Complaint *1262(Doc. 16), filed September 30, 2014. On October 17, 2014, Plaintiff responded in opposition (Doc. 19). Upon consideration the Court denies Defendant’s motion to dismiss. I. BACKGROUND

KAYATTA, Circuit Judge. While employed by GlaxoSmithKline (“GSK”), Blair Hamrick (“Hamrick”) told two Human Resource (“HR”) managers that he was thinking about killing a coworker. When Hamrick shortly thereafter told several co-workers that he hated the company, wanted to shoot some people, and was obsessed with the thought of killing certain specifically identified co-workers, GS

ACCEPTED 15-25-00109-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 6/23/2025 5:08 PM NO. __-__-______-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

In the United States Court of Federal Claims No. 10-707C Filed: August 31, 2016 Reissued: December 1, 20171 * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * * OASIS INTERNATIONAL WATERS, * INC., * * Plaintiff, * Trial; Counterclaim; Fraud;

E. GRADY JOLLY, Circuit Judge: *746 This products liability case arises from a deadly car crash. Arthur Melton Smith was killed while driving a 2013 Jeep Wrangler, designed and manufactured by Chrysler Group, L.L.C. Days after the crash, Chrysler sent out a Recall Notice explaining that the

OPINION OF THE COURT HARDIMAN, Circuit Judge. This appeal arising under the False Claims Act involves a multi-billion dollar cancer drug, Avastin, which was developed by Appellee Genentech. Relator Gerasimos Petratos, who was head of healthcare data analytics for Genentech, filed a qui tam action soon after leaving the company. He allege

RILEY, Chief Judge. In the early 2000s, doctors saw a spike in the number of patients developing chon-drolysis — a rare and “painful medical condition whereby an individual loses articular cartilage in a joint,” Mack v. Stryker Corp., 748 F.3d 845, 848 (8th Cir.2014). Concern then surfaced that this spike was related to the use of medical devices known as “pa

DECISION AND ORDER WILLIAM M. SKRETNY, United States District Judge Relator Dr. Kent Takemoto alleges under the False Claims Act, 31 U.S.C. §§ 3729 et seq., that the various named defendants knowingly and improperly avoided their obligation to reimburse the United States for payments made to Medicare beneficiaries, as required by the *276Medicare S

Missouri Court of Appeals Southern District Division One MICHAEL SHEFFIELD, ) ) Plaintiff-Appellant, ) ) vs. ) No. SD35952 ) GREG MATLOCK, HUSCH

OPINION Trial; Counterclaim; Fraud; False Claims Act; Special Plea in Fraud; Contract Disputes Act. HORN, J. Plaintiff, Oasis International Waters, Inc. (Oasis), is a contractor which performed a bottled water contract with the United States military in Iraq during the Iraq War. Oasis is a Nevada corporation for which the principal place of business is in Utah. After the end of contrac

787 F.Supp.2d 1329 (2011) UNITED STATES of America ex rel. Angela PARATO, Plaintiff, v. UNADILLA HEALTH CARE CENTER, INC., James Ray Irwin, Bob Lemmon, Charlotte Vestal, Leroy Shewman, Gred Speight, E.K. Chaney, Ronney Ledford, Betty Ward, Margaret Whitehead, Sherry Evans, Barbara Gaston, and Bruce Whyte, Defendants. Civil Action No. 5:07-CV-76 (MTT). United States District Court, M.D. Georgia, Macon D

ORDER AMY TOTENBERG, District Judge. Before the Court is Wells Fargo’s Motion to Dismiss [Doc. 409], Wells Fargo seeks to dismiss Relators from this case based on their violations of both the statutory seal requirement of 31 U.S.C. § 3730(b)(2), as well as the Court’s seal orders. For the following reasons, Wells Fargo’s motion is DENIED. However, as discussed below, the Court finds that signif