Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
11 opinions for “Maegen Walker”
ACCEPTED 05-15-00384-CV FIFTH COURT OF APPEALS DALLAS, TEXAS 12/16/2
JOHN MCCOY v. R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANYpublic domain
Gross, J. We reverse the circuit court’s order denying a motion for attorney’s fees based upon a'2014 proposal for settlement under section 768.79, Florida Statutes (2015). 1 On July 24, 2014, the plaintiff/appellant served a proposal for settlement on each of three
Pruitt Industrial Electrical Contractors, LLC, Robert Pruitt, and Kimberly Pruitt v. City Electric Supply Companypublic domain
SIXTH DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ Case No. 6D2025-0450 Lower Tribunal No. 2023-CA-013436-O _____________________________ PRUITT INDUSTRIAL ELECTRICAL CONTRACTORS, LLC, ROBERT PRUITT, and KIMBERLY PRUITT, Appellants,
STATE OF WEST VIRGINIA SUPREME COURT OF APPEALS Meagen Brinegar, FILED Plaintiff Below, Petitioner July 30, 2020 EDYTHE NASH GAISER, CLERK vs.) No. 19-0691 (Kanawha County 16-C-1765) SUPREME COURT OF APPE
JUDITH PEARSON, AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE v. IN RE: ENGLE PROGENY CASES TOBACCO LITIGATIONpublic domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT JUDITH PEARSON, as personal ) representative of the Estate of Donald ) Pearson, deceased, )
Pearson v. Philip Morris USA Inc.public domain
BLACK, Judge. *443Judith Pearson, as personal representative of the Estate of Donald Pearson, appeals the judgment entered in favor of Philip Morris USA Inc. in this Engle 1 progeny case. Mrs. Pearson raises three issues on appeal, only two of which we address: the court's improper denial of a challenge to
Pearson v. Philip Morris USA Inc.public domain
BLACK, Judge. *443Judith Pearson, as personal representative of the Estate of Donald Pearson, appeals the judgment entered in favor of Philip Morris USA Inc. in this Engle 1 progeny case. Mrs. Pearson raises three issues on appeal, only two of which we address: the court's improper denial of a challenge to
FIRST DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL STATE OF FLORIDA _____________________________ No. 1D17-2104 _____________________________ R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, Appellant/Cross-Appellee, v. LINDA PRENTICE, as Personal Representative of the Estate of John C. Price, Appellee/Cross-Appellant. _____________________________ On appeal from the Circuit Court for Duval County. Tyrie W.
R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Company v. Everspublic domain
NOT FINAL UNTIL TIME EXPIRES TO FILE REHEARING MOTION AND, IF FILED, DETERMINED IN THE DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL OF FLORIDA SECOND DISTRICT R.J. REYNOLDS TOBACCO COMPANY, ) ) ) Appellant, )
Theresa Graham v. R.J Reynolds Tobacco Companypublic domain
WILLIAM PRYOR, Circuit Judge: This appeal presents the questions whether due process forbids giving a jury’s findings of negligence and strict liability in a class action against cigarette manufacturers preclusive effect in a later individual suit by a class member and, if not, whether federal law preempts the jury’s findings. Florida smokers and their survivors filed a class action against several tobacco companies, and aft
Berger v. Philip Morris USA, Inc.public domain
ORDER Carr, Senior United States District Judge1 This is an “Engle -progeny”2 lawsuit by Plaintiff Judith Berger (“Mrs. Berger”), ■ a former smoker of cigarettes, against the manufacturer of those cigarettes, Defendant Philip Morris USA, Inc. (“PM USA”). Mrs. Berger, who now suffers from advanced chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder (“CO