Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 25a0026p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ ANDREW COOPERRIDER; DEANS DINER, LLC, dba │ Brewed,

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 18-1361 Filed August 21, 2019 IN THE MATTER OF THE GUARDIANSHIP AND CONSERVATORSHIP OF MAGGIE JEAN LEWIS TURNER, TIMOTHY LEWIS and KIMBERLY HAWKINS, Petitioners-Appellants. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Johnson County, Lars G. Anderson, Judge. A ward’s niece and nephew appeal th

On Emergency Transfer Pursuant to Indiana Appellate Rule 56(A) PER CURIAM. The Redistricting Statute for Marion County assigns the task of redrawing the County’s legislative districts to the judiciary if the County’s legislative and executive branches become deadlocked over required redistricting. Peterson v. Borst, 786 N.E.2d 668, 67

Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Erie Court (Joseph R. Glownia, J.), entered April 7, 2016. The order denied the motion of defendant for summary judgment dismissing the complaint. It is hereby ordered that the order so appealed from is unanimously modified on the law by granting the motion in part and dismissing the first cause of action, and as modified the order is affirmed wi

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT NEIL GRENNING, No. 11-35579 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. v. 2:09-cv-00389- JPH MAGGIE MILLER-STOUT; JIM DYSON; FRED FOX, sued in their individual and official capacities, OPINION Defendants-Appellees.

PER CURIAM. Appellant, Jeffrey Lance Butler, appeals a non-final order granting his petition for modification and argues in part that the trial court’s written judgment as to the parties’ timesharing schedule with their three minor children is inconsistent with the trial court’s oral pronouncement on this issue. We agree and reverse as to this issue. The trial court clearly stated during the hearing ad

In a child support proceeding pursuant to Family Court Act article 4, the father appeals from an order of the Family Court, Kings County (Hamill, J.), dated April 15, 2003, which denied his objections to an order of the same court (Baur, H.E.) dated January 8, 2003, which, after a hearing, inter alia, directed him to pay bi-weekly child support in the sum of $704.67. Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs. The

*634DECISION AND ENTRY ADOPTING REPORT AND RECOMMENDATIONS OF UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE (DOC. # 16) IN THEIR ENTIRETY; DEFENDANT’S OBJECTIONS TO SAID JUDICIAL FILING (DOC. # 17) OVERRULED; JUDGMENT TO BE ENTERED IN PLAINTIFF AND AGAINST DEFENDANT COMMISSIONER, REVERSING COMMISSIONER’S DECISION THAT PLAINTIFF WAS NOT DISABLED AND, THEREFORE. NOT ENTITLED TO BENEFITS UNDER THE SOCIAL SECURITY AC

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. In these consolidated appeals, Jose Lopez, Pedro Esparza-Diaz, Pedro Arrelucea-Zamudio, and Silvestre Brito-Hernandez (“Appellants”) challenge the constitutionality and reasonableness of the sentences they received after pleading guilty to illegal reentry, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326(a) and (b)(2).

Justice LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court. Teachers ordinarily obtain tenure in a position when they serve for any of the time periods set forth in N.J.S.A. 18A:28-5. The Legislature created an exception to that general rule in N.J.S.A. 18A:16-1.1. Under that exception, a board of education may designate a per

MEMORANDUM DECISION FILED Pursuant to Ind. Appellate Rule 65(D), this Mar 29 2018, 8:50 am Memorandum Decision shall not be regarded as precedent or cited before any court except for the CLERK Indiana Supreme Court

MAGGIE MANAGEMENT COMPANY, Petitioner v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE, RespondentMAGGIE MGMT. CO. v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUEDocket No. 8017-94United States Tax Court

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-26-00254-CR Lewis Carl Hunt, Appellant v. The State of Texas, Appellee FROM THE 426TH DISTRICT COURT OF BELL COUNTY, NO. 23DCR87673, THE HONORABLE STEVEN J. DUSKIE, JUDGE PRESIDING MEMORANDUM OPINION Appel

47 Cal.Rptr.3d 467 (2006) 39 Cal.4th 970 140 P.3d 775 The PEOPLE, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. Albert LEWIS and Anthony Cedric Oliver, Defendants and Appellants. No. S033436. Supreme Court of California. August 24, 2006. *481 Eric S. Multhaup, Mill Valley, under appointment by the S

Justice LaVECCHIA delivered the opinion of the Court. In this appeal we address whether the Law Against Discrimination (LAD), N.J.S.A. 10:5-1 to -49 — a law established to fulfill a public-interest purpose — can be contravened by private agreement. Here an employment application contained a provision requiring the ap

Maggie J. Hairston appeals from a summary judgment entered in favor of the defendant, Liberty National Life Insurance Company, in an action alleging breach of contract and bad faith failure to pay an insurance claim. The question presented is whether the trial court erred in holding that, as a matter of law, the death of Ms. Hairston's ex-husband, James L. Hairston, by acute ethanol poisoning, was not "accidental" within the terms of the insurance policy on Mr. Hairston's life.

*292 JOHNSON, Circuit Judge: This is an appeal from a judgment of forfeiture, pursuant to 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), of $47,875 in United States currency. Claimants, Warded A. and Maggie J. Lucas, contend that they are the innocent owners of $32,500 of the forfei

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION TO STRIKE AND DEFENDANT’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT MARK W. BENNETT, District Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. INTRODUCTION AND BACKGROUND .....................................987 A. Factual Background...................................................987 B. Procedural

SHIRLEY S. ABRAHAMSON, C.J. ¶ 60. {concurring). I join the majority opinion. I agree that the written confession was involuntary and that the decision of the court of the appeals should be reversed. I wholeheartedly join the court in adopting a rule requiring police to record electronically all juvenile interrogations. ¶ 61. I write for two reasons. First, I write to discuss the court's state consti

[Cite as State v. Baker, 2025-Ohio-1568.] IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF OHIO SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT MONTGOMERY COUNTY STATE OF OHIO : : Appellee : C.A. No. 30249 : v.