⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

8 opinions for “Makeda R. Williams”

Howard v. Sheltonpublic domain
District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2011-08-30 · Published · cited 2× · 277 F.R.D. 168; 2011 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 97539; 2011 WL 3846703
ORDER CARLTON W. REEVES, District Judge. The above-styled matter is before the Court on the defendants’ Motion to Dismiss.1 The Court has duly considered the request but has concluded that good cause warrants the motion’s denial. On September 7, 2010, Makeda Howard (hereinafter “Howard”), acting pro se, filed suit2 in distri
District Court, Virgin Islands · 2008-08-05 · Published · cited 0× · 50 V.I. 503; 2008 WL 3377325; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 61532
MEMORANDUM OPINION (August 5, 2008) Appellant Gregory Williams (“Williams”) appeals his conviction of first-degree murder, unauthorized carrying of a firearm during the commission of first-degree murder, first-degree assault, unauthorized carrying of a firearm during the commission of first-degree assault, and unauthorized possession of ammunition. For the reasons given below, the Court will affirm the conviction.<
District Court, Virgin Islands · 2009-06-26 · Published · cited 0× · 51 V.I. 1053; 2009 WL 1872666; 2009 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 55548
GOMEZ, Chief Judge of the District Court of the Virgin Islands', FINCH, Judge of the District Court of the Virgin Islands', and FRANCIS J. D’ERAMO, Judge of the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Division of St. Croix, sitting by designation. MEMORANDUM OPINION (June 26, 2009) Following a jury trial conducted in the Superior Court of the Virgin Islands, Di
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2021-02-17 · Published · cited 1× · 191 A.D.3d 872; 138 N.Y.S.3d 897; 2021 NY Slip Op 01042
Matter of Ciriaco v Hall (2021 NY Slip Op 01042) Matter of Ciriaco v Hall 2021 NY Slip Op 01042 Decided on February 17, 2021 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan
Zibara v. Holderpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2013-04-09 · Published · cited 0× · 515 F. App'x 666
MEMORANDUM *** Badereddine Mohamad Zibara petitions for review of an order by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) dismissing his appeal from the immigration judge’s decision denying his applications for asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for substantial evidence the agency’s factual findings.
Heyliger v. Peoplepublic domain
Supreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 2017-02-09 · Published · cited 5× · 66 V.I. 340; 2017 V.I. Supreme LEXIS 9
OPINION OF THE COURT (February 9, 2017) Swan, Associate Justice. Appellant Dyhani Heyliger was charged in a fifteen count amended information with the murder of Keith Dawson, Jr., during an attempt to perpetrate a third-degree assault against Shaquille Alexander Percell.1 Heyliger now appeals from the Superior Court’s January 21, 2014 judgment and commit
Fuller v. Schultzpublic domain
District Court, S.D. New York · 2008-08-27 · Published · cited 2× · 572 F. Supp. 2d 425; 2008 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 65609; 2008 WL 3915037
(2008) Bernard FULLER, Petitioner, v. Susan I. SCHULTZ, Respondent. No. 04 Civ. 5065(RJH)(FM). United States District Court, S.D. New York. August 27, 2008. ORDER RICHARD J. HOLWELL, District Judge. Petitioner Bernard Fuller ("Fuller") brings this petition for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, challenging his Octobe
Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994-04-19 · Published · cited 21× · 22 F.3d 463; 1 Wage & Hour Cas.2d (BNA) 1645; 146 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2296; 1994 U.S. App. LEXIS 8358; 1994 WL 143676
JACOBS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs are employees of the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (“FDIC”) who claim that the FDIC improperly classified their jobs as exempt from the overtime provisions of the Fair Labor Standards Act (“FLSA”), 29 U.S.C. §§ 201-19 (1982). Upon motion by the FDIC, and after a hearing, the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New Yor