Cases

MEMORANDUM OPINION KEVIN R. HUENNEKENS, Bankruptcy Judge. The debtors, Circuit City Stores, Inc., et al, (the “Debtors,” or “Circuit City”) filed these bankruptcy cases under Chapter 11 of the Bankruptcy Code on November 10, 2008 (the “Petition Date”).1 The Debtors’ bankruptcy cases were consolidated for joint administration pursuant to Rule 1015(b) of the Fed

447 B.R. 475 (2009) In re CIRCUIT CITY STORES, INC., et al., Debtors. No. 08-35653. United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. Virginia, Richmond Division. February 12, 2009. Robin S. Abramowitz, Lazer, Aptheker, Rosella & Yedid, P.C., Melville, NY, for *476 Bond Circuit VIII Delaware Business Trust. Angela Sheffler Abreu, McCarter

OPINION OF THE COURT Per Curiam. Section 468-a of the Judiciary Law requires every resident and nonresident attorney admitted to practice in the State of New York to file a biennial registration statement with the administrative office of the courts. A biennial registration fee must be paid at the time the statement is filed. This registration statement, which is mailed every two years by the Office of Co

447 S.E.2d 498 (1994) J.D. ROBINETTE, Plaintiff, v. William G. BARRIGER, W. Malcolm Blalock and Alexander County, Defendants. No. 9322SC387. Court of Appeals of North Carolina. September 6, 1994. *499 Michael B. Brough & Associates by Michael B. Brough, Chapel Hill, for plaintiff appellant-appellee. Womble Carlyle Sand

MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER Cheryl A. Eifert, United States Magistrate Judge Pending before the Court is Plaintiffs’ Motion to Compel Defendant Ford Motor Company to Produce Documents Listed in its Supplemental ASO (Automotive Safety Office) Privilege Log and for Sanctions. (ECF *229No. 536).1 Defendant Ford

ORDER DAVID C. GODBEY, District Judge. This Order addresses various former Stanford employees’ (the “Employee Defendants”) 1 motions to dismiss [201, 203, 204, 211, 234, 305, 387, 403, 407, 408, 427, 488]. For the reasons that follow, the Court denies the motions.2 I. Origins op the Receiver’s Asset Recovery Action

DISCOVERY ORDER PAUL TREVOR SHARP, United States Magistrate. This matter is before the Court for a ruling on the motion of defendant Purcell Company, Inc. (Purcell) for a protective order, filed October 9, 1984. Counsel appeared at a hearing on the motion on December 14, 1984, at the United States Courthouse in Greensboro. *643Pu

725 F.Supp. 1365 (1989) Bobby STOTT, Joseph Register, and Lonnie Michael Cayton, on behalf of themselves and others similarly situated, Plaintiffs, v. James G. MARTIN, individually and in his official capacity as Governor of the State of North Carolina, et al., Defendants. Nos. 85-818-CIV-5, 86-650-CIV-5 and 86-683-CIV-5. United States District Court, E.D. North Carolina, Raleigh Division.

Atkins, Judge: The respondent determined deficiencies in income taxes for the calendar years 1950 and 1951 in the respective amounts of $12,591.24 and $10,525.80. The item in issue for 1950 represents gain realized on the redemption of stock in a housing corporation and reported as long-term capital gain which the respondent determined to be ordinary income, either as compe

449 F.Supp.2d 1 (2006) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, and Tobacco-Free Kids Action Fund, American Cancer Society, American Heart Association, American Lung Association, Americans for Nonsmokers' Rights, and National African American Tobacco Prevention Network, Intervenors, v. PHILIP MORRIS USA, INC., (f/k/a Philip Morris, Inc.), et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 99-2496(GK). United States Distri

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER WEINSTEIN, Senior District Judge. 1. Introduction This memorandum and order addresses plaintiffs’ application for class certification. See Third Amended Class Action Complaint and Supplemental Memorandum in Support Amended and Renewed Motion for Class Certification, dated July 26, 2002. Extensive briefing and argument by the parties on the issue have been con