Cases

STEAGALL, Justice. In April 1990, Michael Graham purchased a Nissan Sentra automobile from Bob Man-dal Nissan, Inc. (hereinafter “Mandal Nissan”), a dealership located in Mobile County. Several times thereafter, Graham took the vehicle back to Mandal Nissan for repair of an apparent defect that caused the vehicle to “jerk” or swerve to the side when changing lanes. In September 1990, Graham was riding

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF FEDERAL CLAIMS ______________________________________ ) H&M ASSOCIATES, LLC, ) ) Plaintiff, ) No. 22-110C ) v. ) Filed: March 31, 2023 ) THE UNITED STATES, )

lln tl,e elnitei Stdted €ourt 0f .felsral @l80rtg No. 15-1585C FII€di2/25h6 JACK E, ALLEN, Plainrfi, elgS9 Plaintiff; ]!Egqa P.uooris Application; R€quest for Appointmsnt ol Couns.li Lack of UNITED STATES, Subiecl Mattor Jurisdict

Opinion of the Court COX, Judge: Appellant was convicted, contrary to his pleas, by a general court-martial composed of officer and enlisted members, of voluntary manslaughter in the death of his 2-year-old son, in violation of Article 119, Uniform Code of Military Justice, 10 U.S.C. § 919. He was sentenced to a dishonorable discharge, confinement for 8 years, total forfeitures, and reduction to Priva

Mollison, Judge: Tbe appeals for reappraisement listed in schedule ‘ A,” hereto attached and made a part hereof, have been submitted for decision upon the following stipulation of counsel for the parties hereto: IT IS HEREBY STIPULATED AND AGREED, subject to the approval of the Court, that the issues in the appeals to reappraisement listed herein are the same in all material respects as the issues in

745 F.Supp. 9 (1990) 1756, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. The ATTORNEY GENERAL OF the UNITED STATES of America, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 89-2423-LFO. United States District Court, District of Columbia. August 23, 1990. *10 *11 Philip J. Hare, Marie C. Marcoux, Washington, D.C., for plaintiffs.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: S&H Restaurant, Incorporated, Man-dal Enterprises L.C., partner corporations, and the owners and operators, appeal the district court’s order denying their motion for a new trial. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion for a new trial, and “will not reverse suc

OPINION JEAN K. FITZSIMON, Bankruptcy Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The Plaintiff in this adversary proceeding (the “Adversary Proceeding”), Hartford Fire Insurance Company (“Hartford”), is the insurer and indemnitor for the losses of Aerogroup International, Inc. (“Aerogroup”).1 In this litigation, Hartford seeks to hold the Defendant/Debtor Wendy Ann

161 S.W.3d 128 (2005) Gary Michael BARNETT, Appellant, v. The STATE of Texas, State. No. 2-03-134-CR. Court of Appeals of Texas, Fort Worth. January 20, 2005. Rehearing Overruled February 17, 2005. *130 William H. "Bill" Ray, Fort Worth, for Appellant. Tim Curry, Crim. Dist. Atty., Charles M. Mallin, Sylvi

BILBREY, J., concurring in pari and in result. ' Following the retirement of the Honorable Nikki Clark from this Court the “luck of the draw”8 has placed me on the three judge panel assigned to consider the motion for rehearing. While there is no clear guidance on the appropriate standard the successor judge is to apply when passing on a motion for reh

OPINION Walls, Senior District Judge Plaintiff Flora Leonard claims that Defendants Golden Touch Transportation of New York, Incorporated (“Golden Touch”), United Airlines Incorporated, and the Port Authority of New York & New Jersey (“Port Authority”) were negligently responsible for an injury she suffered at Newark Liberty International Airport. Plaintiff moves to amend the complaint to assert a claim aga

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 377 {¶ 1} Defendant-appellant, Adonte Cherry, appeals from his conviction and sentence on one count each of having weapons under disability, drug abuse, and receiving stolen property. Cherry contends that because he did not have control of the gun found in the car and because he was not a fugitiv

373 B.R. 170 (2007) In re Jarett R. LEZDEY, Debtor. Allan Wachter, M.D., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Jarett R. Lezdey, et al., Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 8:05-bk-8711-KRM. Adversary No. 8:06-ap-0552-KRM. United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Florida, Tampa Division. June 8, 2007. *171 Edwin G. Rice, Glenn Rasmussen Fogarty & Ho

SYLLABUS This syllabus is not part of the Court’s opinion. It has been prepared by the Office of the Clerk for the convenience of the reader. It has been neither reviewed nor approved by the Court and may not summarize all portions of the opinion. Comprehensive Neurosurgical, P.C. v. The Valley Hospital (A-52-22) (087469) Argued November 29, 2023 -- Decided April 16, 2024 FASCIALE, J., writing for a unanimous Court. The Court considers The Valley

Soma Tech., Inc. v. Dalamagas, 2017 NCBC 42. STATE OF NORTH CAROLINA IN THE GENERAL COURT OF JUSTICE SUPERIOR COURT DIVISION MECKLENBURG COUNTY 16 CVS 11100 SOMA TECHNOLOGY, INC. ORDER AND OPINION ON Plaintiff, DEFENDANT DESAI’S 12(B)(6) v. MOTION,

OPINION AND ORDER RONNIE ABRAMS, District Judge. Pro se Plaintiff Tracey Elaine Blair brings this defamation action against Defendant Inside Edition, Inc., alleging that a series of broadcasts on Inside Edition’s televised news program injured her reputation by publicizing numerous false statements concerning her occupancy of the house of her former landlord, Heidi Peterson, while Pete

427 F.Supp.2d 563 (2006) Felix NEDLER, Frida Vaysman, Inna Proshak, Individually and Derivatively on behalf of Circle of Friends ADHC, Inc., and Steven Proshak, Individually and Derivatively on behalf of Odessa Partners, LLC Plaintiffs, v. Victoria and Alan VAISBERG, h/w, Joseph and Lana Mandale, h/w, Michael and Elina Zaverukha, Mikhail Slobodskoi, Grace Adult Day Healthcare, Inc., LJ Cab Co., Inc., Metropolitan Transportation, Co., LLC., Two St

CHANDLER, J., for the Court: ¶ 1. James and Melissa D’Angelo agreed to arbitrate a contract dispute with Hometown Concepts, d/b/a/ Hampton Homes, the contractor which built their home. The arbitrator ruled in favor of the D’Angelos and awarded them damages. The D’Angelos petitioned the Harrison County Circuit Court to amend the arbitrator’s award to increase the damages. The circuit court declined to amend th

~z\U,OlOH /OQ//U) // |N RE'CGLL|NS O. NYABWA IN THE 5"' cchulT couRT oF APPEALS PETITIoN FoR ExTRAoRDlNARY WRlT (MANDAl\/lus) ’ RECE|VED |N COURT OF CR|M|NAL APPEALS SEP ‘i 4 2015 Abe| Acosta, Clerk coule 0. NYABWA PETlTloNER (PRo sE) 1341 w. 43'“’ sTREET, #163 ' HousToN, Tx 77018 TABLE OF CONTENTS |SSUES PRESENTED LlsT 0F PARTlEs` ARGuMENT REL|EF SOUGHT WHY WR|T SHOULD |SSUE CERT|F|CATE OF SERV|CE . coPY oF 42 u.s.`c. § 1983 coMPLAINT |SSUES PRESENTED ' 1. Does

DECISION AND ORDER ON MOTION TO SET ASIDE DEFAULT D. BROCK HORNBY, District Judge. This motion presents two major issues: whether service of process was proper upon a corporation that, at the time of *210service, was dissolved; and if so, whether good cause exists to set aside a default entered against it. I conclude that service of process met Mai