⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Manning v. Campbell”

Manning v. Campbellpublic domain
Idaho Supreme Court · 2012-01-25 · Published · cited 2× · 268 P.3d 1184; 152 Idaho 232; 2012 Ida. LEXIS 31
268 P.3d 1184 (2012) Thomas Crellin MANNING and Julie Ann Manning, husband and wife, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. William J. CAMPBELL, an unmarried individual, and Naomi Louise Campbell, an unmarried individual, Defendants-Respondents. No. 37728. Supreme Court of Idaho, Boise, January 2012 Term. January 25, 2012. *1185 Thomas A. Ban
Campbell v. Manningpublic domain
District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1997-08-13 · Published · cited 0× · 697 So. 2d 1020; 1997 Fla. App. LEXIS 9276; 1997 WL 473805
PER CURIAM. Upon the filing of the emergency petition for writ of Habeas Corpus, we ordered the petitioner released forthwith on his own recognizance. The jailer has now filed a response in which he admits that Campbell’s conviction and imprisonment for indirect criminal contempt based on his failure to pay child support, which followed a trial at which he purportedly waived counsel below, are constitutionally invalid beca
Manning v. Manningpublic domain
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 2008-09-16 · Published · cited 1× · 956 A.2d 102; 2008 ME 143; 2008 Me. LEXIS 145
SAUFLEY, C.J. [¶ 1] Duane A. Manning appeals from a divorce judgment entered in the District Court (York, O’Neil, J.) awarding transitional spousal support to Dana E. Manning. Duane argues that the court misread his earnings statement, understood his annual income to be higher than it was, and therefore erred in calculating his transitional spousal support obligation. We *
People v. Manningpublic domain
Appellate Court of Illinois · 2007-02-09 · Published · cited 0× · 371 Ill. App. 3d 457; 863 N.E.2d 289; 309 Ill. Dec. 59; 2007 Ill. App. LEXIS 102
PRESIDING JUSTICE GEOMETER delivered the opinion of the court: Defendant, Patrick L. Manning, pleaded guilty to one count of residential burglary (720 ILCS 5/19 — 3 (West 2002)). Due to his prior criminal history, defendant was sentenced as a Class X offender (see 730 ILCS 5/5 — 5—3(c)(8) (West 2002)), and the t
District Court, N.D. California · 2016-05-18 · Published · cited 6× · 315 F.R.D. 250; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 66267; 2016 WL 2897936
ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART MOTION FOR CLASS CERTIFICATION PHYLLIS J. HAMILTON, United States District Judge On March 16, 2016, plaintiffs’ motion for class certification came on for hearing before this court. Plaintiffs Matthew Campbell and Michael Hurley (“plaintiffs”) appeared through their counsel, Michael Sobol, Hank Bates, David Rudolph, and Melissa Gardner. Defendant Faeebook, Inc. (“de
Manning v. Statepublic domain
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2003-03-11 · Published · cited 8× · 581 S.E.2d 290; 260 Ga. App. 171; 2003 Ga. App. LEXIS 362
581 S.E.2d 290 (2003) 260 Ga. App. 171 MANNING v. The STATE. No. A02A2199. Court of Appeals of Georgia. March 11, 2003. *291 Christopher G. Paul, Cartersville, for appellant. T. Joseph Campbell, Dist. Atty., Mickey R. Thacker, Asst. Dist. Atty., for appellee. ADAMS, Judge. John Craig M
Campbell v. Hsinpublic domain
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2011-05-31 · Published · cited 0× · 433 F. App'x 195
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Charles Hsin appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion to set aside the entry of a default against him and the subsequent entry of default judgment. We have reviewed the record and the briefs filed by the parties and find no abuse of discretion and no
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 148 A.D.3d 1747; 49 N.Y.S.3d 330
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered January 16, 2014 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment, inter alia, dismissed the petition. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment that, inter alia, dismissed without a hearing his
Manning v. Principipublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 2002-12-19 · Published · cited 2× · 16 Vet. App. 534; 2002 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 999; 2002 WL 31835294
This version includes the errata issued 26Dec02-e UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR VETERANS CLAIMS NO . 98-572 ROGER V. MANNING , APPELLANT , V. ANTHONY J. PRINCIPI, SECRETARY OF VETERANS AFFAIRS, APPELLEE On Appeal from the Board of Veterans' Appeals
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2017-03-31 · Published · cited 0× · 148 A.D.3d 1747; 49 N.Y.S.3d 330
Appeal from a judgment (denominated order and judgment) of the Supreme Court, Oneida County (Samuel D. Hester, J.), entered January 16, 2014 in a habeas corpus proceeding. The judgment, inter alia, dismissed the petition. It is hereby ordered that the judgment so appealed from is unanimously affirmed without costs. Memorandum: Petitioner appeals from a judgment that, inter alia, dismissed without a hearing his
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016-11-02 · Published · cited 0× · 160 A.3d 784; 639 Pa. 377; 2016 WL 6508494; 2016 Pa. LEXIS 2513
ORDER PER CURIAM AND NOW, this 2nd day of November, 2016, the Petition for Allowance of Appeal is DENIED. Justice Mundy did not participate in the consideration or decision of this matter.
Manning v. Campbellpublic domain
Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1928-09-15 · Published · cited 17× · 264 Mass. 386; 162 N.E. 770; 1928 Mass. LEXIS 1276
Sanderson, J. The original plaintiffs were trustees in bankruptcy of Campbell Electric Company, a corporation hereinafter referred to as the company,, and they brought this bill against the directors to recover losses sustained by the company because of the failure of the defendants to administer its business with the care and fidelity required of directors. In the Superior Court the demurrers filed by five of the defendants were
North Carolina Industrial Commission · 2003-08-18 · Published · cited 0×
*********** Upon review of the competent evidence of record with reference to the errors assigned, and finding no good grounds to receive further evidence or to rehear the parties or their representatives, the Full Commission upon reconsideration of the evidence modifies and affirms the Opinion and Award of the Deputy Commissioner. *********** The Full Commission finds as fact and concludes
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2015-09-16 · Published · cited 0× · 616 F. App'x 74
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Kathryn Lynn Campbell appeals the district court’s order granting the Appellees’ motion to dismiss Campbell’s complaint and denying Campbell’s motions for a declaratory judgment and for summary judgment. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm
Supreme Court of Delaware · 2008-04-23 · Published · cited 20× · 947 A.2d 1116; 2008 Del. LEXIS 188; 2008 WL 1810085
947 A.2d 1116 (2008) Stephen M. CAMPBELL and Stacy A. Campbell, husband and wife, jointly and individually and as guardians ad litem of Jonathan S. Campbell and Lauren E. Campbell, minor children, Plaintiffs Below, Appellants, v. Marie DiSABATINO and Patterson Schwartz Associates, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, Defendants Below, Appellees. No. 256,2007. Supreme Court of Delaware.
District Court, E.D. Wisconsin · 2009-10-13 · Published · cited 1× · 667 F. Supp. 2d 993; 2009 WL 3270085
667 F.Supp.2d 993 (2009) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Lervon CAMPBELL, Defendant. Case No. 09-CR-78. United States District Court, E.D. Wisconsin. October 9, 2009. As Corrected October 13, 2009. *995 John J. Manning, United States Department of Justice, Office of the U.S. Attorney, Milwaukee, WI, for P
Manning v. Westpublic domain
United States Court of Appeals for Veterans Claims · 1999-02-19 · Published · cited 14× · 12 Vet. App. 242; 1999 U.S. Vet. App. LEXIS 277
STEINBERG, Judge: On May 12, 1997, the appellant, Vietnam-era veteran Sam Mannino, appealed through counsel a March 25, 1997, decision of the Board of Veterans’ Appeals denying an increased rating for residuals of a right-patella fracture. Pursuant to a joint motion by the parties, the Court, on December 29, 1997, entered an order that vacated that decision and remanded the matter. On January 21, 1998, the appellant filed th
Indiana Court of Appeals · 2024-05-08 · Published · cited 0×
FILED May 08 2024, 9:09 am CLERK Indiana Supreme Court Court of Appeals
State v. Campbellpublic domain
Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2003-10-16 · Published · cited 0× · 859 So. 2d 223; 2003 La. App. LEXIS 2853; 2003 WL 22351443
| t STEWART, J. The state appeals the trial court’s grant of a motion to quash a third habitual offender bill of information which the state filed in a DWI (third offense) case against Willie Campbell (“Campbell”). For the reasons that follow, we affirm the trial court. FACTS The state charged Campbell with a DWI (third offense) for an incident that occurred in March 2002. He had prior
Supreme Court of Iowa · 2003-10-08 · Published · cited 19× · 670 N.W.2d 108; 2003 Iowa Sup. LEXIS 190; 2003 WL 22299473
670 N.W.2d 108 (2003) Lester CAMPBELL, Appellant, v. Arnold DELBRIDGE and Covenant Medical Center, Inc., Appellees. No. 02-1007. Supreme Court of Iowa. October 8, 2003. *109 Douglas V. Coonrad, Hudson, for appellant. Joseph L. Fitzgibbons and Ned A. Stockdale of Fitzgibbons Law Firm, Estherville, for appellee Covenant Medi