⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

20 opinions for “Mansell v. Gray”

United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri · 2006-11-14 · Published · cited 2× · 355 B.R. 777; 2006 Bankr. LEXIS 3313; 2006 WL 3408242
355 B.R. 777 (2006) In re Braxton Mansel GRAY and Karen Jane Gray, Debtors. Thomas J. O'Neal, Plaintiff, v. Jim Arnold, Defendant. Bankruptcy No. 05-61922, Adversary No. 06-6067. United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Missouri. November 14, 2006. *778 David E. Schroeder, David Schroeder Law Offices, PC, Springfield, MO, for Deb
Court of Appeals of Georgia · 1983-02-16 · Published · cited 2× · 302 S.E.2d 114; 165 Ga. App. 568; 1983 Ga. App. LEXIS 1953
Shulman, Chief Judge. The facts of this case are contained in this court’s opinion in Mansell v. Pappas, 156 Ga. App. 272 (274 SE2d 588). The present appeal arises from a six-day trial which resulted in jury verdicts against appellant Mansell and in favor of appellees Benson Chevrolet Company, Inc. (“Benson”) and Pappas. Benson was awarded $9,468.75 in substantive damages, $ 5,000 in attorney fees, and $28,531.35 in
Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · 2024-03-12 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 TN WC App. 11
FILED Mar 12, 2024 12:26 PM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Tennessee Supreme Court · 2025-01-23 · Published · cited 0×
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF TENNESSEE SPECIAL WORKERS' COMPENSATION APPEALS PANEL AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs August 19, 2024 FILED JAN 2 3 2025 MARK GRAY v. TYSON FOODS, INC. Clerk of th urts
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2020-02-04 · Published · cited 0×
02/04/2020 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE November 6, 2019 Session THE ELECTRIC EMPLOYEES’ CIVIL SERVICE AND PENSION BOARD OF METROPOLITAN GOVERNMENT OF NASHVILLE AND DAVIDSON COUNTY, TENNESSEE v. BRIAN MANSELL Appeal from the Chancery Court for Davidson County No. 18-
Supreme Court of Oklahoma · 1926-11-16 · Published · cited 5× · 250 P. 920; 120 Okla. 187; 1926 OK 909; 1926 Okla. LEXIS 421
The plaintiffs in error were plaintiffs and the defendants in error were defendants in the court below, and will hereafter be so designated. On May 1, 1925, the plaintiffs commenced this action in the district court of Washita county to enjoin the governing body and the defendant city of New Cordell and J. H. Baldwin from carrying out a contract entered into pursuant to a paving ordinance. The material allegations of the plaintiffs' petition are that the defendant city of New Co
Ryder v. Mansellpublic domain
Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1877-01-30 · Published · cited 0× · 66 Me. 167
Peters, J. The facts material to this controversy are these : The plaintiff was the owner of a house, situated on the land of a third person, upon which house was an outstanding mortgage. The plaintiff let the house to the defendant, by parol agreement, for a rent to be paid monthly. After this, the defendant purchased the mortgage upon his own account, and foreclosed it as one upon personal property. Before the foreclosure was c
District Court, N.D. West Virginia · 2014-03-14 · Published · cited 1× · 5 F. Supp. 3d 808; 2014 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 33015; 2014 WL 1017899
OMNIBUS ORDER ON MOTIONS IN LIMINE CONCERNING ADMISSIBILITY OF OTHER-PRODUCT & OTHER-INCIDENT EVIDENCE JOHN PRESTON BAILEY, Chief Judge. Presently pending before this Court are the following Motions in Limine, all filed December 23, 2013: (1) Defendant Packaging Service Company (“PSC’O’s Motion to Prohibit the Admission of Evidence, Testimony, or Documents
Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 2014-07-08 · Published · cited 0× · 578 F. App'x 200
Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion. Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM: Isaac Lee Woods appeals the district court’s judgment dismissing his civil rights complaint. We have reviewed the court’s orders and the record and affirm substantially for the reasons stated by the district court. See Woods v. County of Wilson, No. 5:10-ct-0
Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · 2024-08-30 · Published · cited 0× · 2024 TN WC App. 31
FILED Aug 30, 2024 07:08 AM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · 2025-06-26 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 TN WC App. 21
FILED Jun 26, 2025 02:04 PM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION
Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · 2025-07-31 · Published · cited 0× · 2025 TN WC App. 27
FILED Jul 31, 2025 07:38 AM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION
District Court, W.D. Texas · 1997-01-24 · Published · cited 10× · 957 F. Supp. 847; 1997 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 2441; 1997 WL 93752
957 F.Supp. 847 (1997) Jovita CASAREZ, Plaintiff, v. VAL VERDE COUNTY, A Political Subdivision of the State of Texas, and Maria Elena Cardenas, County Clerk of Val Verde County, Defendants. Civil Action No. DR-96-CA-108. United States District Court, W.D. Texas, Del Rio Division. January 24, 1997. *848
Li v. Statepublic domain
Oregon Supreme Court · 2005-04-14 · Published · cited 22× · 110 P.3d 91; 338 Or. 376; 2005 Ore. LEXIS 144
110 P.3d 91 (2005) 338 Or. 376 Mary LI and Rebecca Kennedy; Stephen Knox, M.D., and Eric Warshaw, M.D.; Kelly Burke and Dolores Doyle; Donna Potter and Pamela Moen; Dominick Vetri and Douglas Dewitt; Sally Sheklow and Enid Lefton; Irene Farrera and Nina Korican; Walter Frankel and Curtis Keifer; Julie Williams and Coleen Belisle; Basic Rights Oregon; and American Civil Liberties Union of Oregon, Respondents, Cross-Appellants, and<
Tennessee Workers' Compensation Appeals Board · 2023-11-17 · Published · cited 0× · 2023 TN WC App. 52
FILED Nov 17, 2023 01:27 PM(CT) TENNESSEE WORKERS' COMPENSATION
District Court, W.D. Oklahoma · 2016-11-14 · Published · cited 0× · 220 F. Supp. 3d 1266; 2016 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 157090; 2016 WL 6693572
ORDER JOE HEATON, CHIEF UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Brenton Trotter and the company he formed in 2009, Trotter Doors, LLC (collectively “Trotter Doors”), sued American Modern Select Insurance Company (“American Modern”), the company’s insurer, asserting breach of contract and bad faith claims. Plaintiffs allege that American Modern breached the duties owed them under a commercial insurance policy when th
Montana Supreme Court · 2005-09-27 · Published · cited 6× · 2005 MT 242; 328 Mont. 490; 121 P.3d 561; 2005 Mont. LEXIS 416
JUSTICE LEAPHART dissenting. ¶21 I dissent. ¶22 In In re Marriage of Strong, 2000 MT 178, ¶ 16, 300 Mont. 331, ¶ 16, 8 P.3d 763, ¶ 16, we held that federal law preempts the State from distributing V.A. benefits “as part of a marital estate.” The Court reasons that Strong “effectively overruled Stone” and goes on to rati
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2024-03-27 · Published · cited 0×
03/27/2024 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE Assigned on Briefs January 2, 2024 KARI DALE REMUS V. BRANDON JOSEPH NUNN Appeal from the Chancery Court for Robertson County No. CH-16-263 Ben Dean, Chancellor No. M2023-00589-COA-R3-C
Court of Appeals of Tennessee · 2022-05-13 · Published · cited 0×
05/13/2022 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT NASHVILLE May 5, 2021 Session DEBRA JEAN GRIFFITH-BALL v. STANLEY LAUREN BALL Appeal from the Circuit Court for Montgomery County No. CC-19-CV-0029 Kathryn Wall Olita, Judge ___________________________________
Lesh v. Leshpublic domain
Court of Appeals of North Carolina · 2018-01-16 · Published · cited 0× · 809 S.E.2d 890
DAVIS, Judge. The primary issue in this appeal is whether federal law prohibits a veteran's military disability benefits from being considered as income for purposes of satisfying a distributive award to his former spouse pursuant to an equitable distribution order. Timothy Lesh ("Mr. Lesh") appeals on federal preemption grounds from the trial court's order denying his motion pursuant t