Cases

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 21-30006 Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. Nos. v. 1:19-cr-02059-SAB-1 1:19-cr-02059-SAB MARC ANTHONY WILLY, Defendant-Appellee. OPINION Appeal from the Unit

During Appellant's trial for first-degree burglary with a deadly weapon, the jury sent out a note stating that it unanimously agreed that Appellant was not guilty of the offense. However, the jury also indicated in this note that it was deadlocked on the issue of guilt for the lesser-included offense of burglary without a deadly weapon. The trial court instructed the jury to keep deliberating and ultimately declared a mistrial when

OPINION COLE, Circuit Judge. After his conviction in Ohio state court for two murders and the aggravated robbery and kidnapping of one of his victims, petitioner Michael Dean Scott was sentenced to death. Scott appealed and pursued post-conviction remedies in state court, to no avail. He now seeks habeas relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The district court

OPINION ROGERS, Circuit Judge. Keith LaMar appeals a district court judgment denying his habeas corpus petition. LaMar was convicted of murdering five fellow inmates during a prison riot in Ohio; he received death sentences for four of the killings and a life sentence for the fifth. On appeal, LaMar argues that the State withheld favorable evidence in vi

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-94-00425-CR Marc Anthony Brown, Appellant v. The State

WILLIAMS, Circuit Judge. In Elliot Don Ray’s first federal habeas appeal we found that his constitutional rights were violated when the state introduced out-of-court statements made by individuals who did not testify at his murder trial. But we remanded to give the state the opportunity to assert a defense that Ray’s state post-conviction motion was untimely. Ray v. Boatwright (Ray I), 592 F.3d 793, 798-99 (7th Cir.

OPINION Opinion by Chief Justice Valdez We issued our original opinion in this cause on May 25, 2017. The State filed a motion for rehearing. After due consideration, and within our plenary power, we sua sponte withdraw our previous opinion and judgment and substitute the following opinion and accompanying judgment in their place.

736 F.Supp. 914 (1990) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Harold B. ALLEN, Phillip M. Blackman, John A. Carpenter, Isaiah Clayton, Thomas Dillon, Henry Dunning, Elbert L. Elfreeze, Jerry Gordon, Everett L. Gully, Anthony Harden, Brady Harden, Carnell Jarrell, Alfred Jefferson, Alvin Jefferson, Sue Jefferson, Thure Mills, Irene Myers, Evans Neal, Charles Newsome, Gerald Prestwood, John Rodgers, Fred Sanders, Fred Smith, Maurice Smith, Willie

PER CURIAM. The orders of the trial court, finding section 893.03(l)(c), Florida Statutes (1978 Supp.), to be unconstitutional are reversed on the basis of this Court’s recent ruling in State v. Cheatham, 376 So.2d 1167 (Fla.1979). These cases are remanded for further proceedings consistent with that opinion. It is so ordered. ENGLAND, C. J., and BOYD, OVER-TON, SUNDB

614 S.E.2d 857 (2005) 273 Ga. App. 227 ALLEN v. The STATE. No. A05A0588. Court of Appeals of Georgia. May 10, 2005. *858 Deborah J. Poole, Atlanta, for appellant. Paul L. Howard, Jr., District Attorney, Marc A. Mallon, Assistant District Attorney, Bettieanne C. Hart, Assistant District Attorney, for

Illinois Official Reports Appellate Court Donald W. Fohrman & Associates, Ltd. v. Marc D. Alberts, P.C., 2014 IL App (1st) 123351 Appellate Court DONALD W. FOHRMAN AND ASSOCIATES, LTD., Plaintiff and Caption Counterdefendant-Appellant, v. MARC D. ALBERTS, P.C., and MARC D. ALBERTS, Individually and as A

450 F.3d 1059 Anthony K. HART, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Bernard PARKS, Chief of Police; Marc Zavala; Robert Rivera; Daryl McLemore, Defendants-Appellees.Anthony K. Hart, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Bernard Parks, Chief of Police; David Kalish; Marc Zavala; Robert Rivera; Manny Avila; Ron Sanchez; Robert Rehme; Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences; James D. Staley; Bruce E. Davis, Defendants-Appellees. No.

Diamond v St. Anthony Community Hosp. (2025 NY Slip Op 06987) Diamond v St. Anthony Community Hosp. 2025 NY Slip Op 06987 Decided on December 17, 2025 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

778 N.W.2d 863 (2010) 2010 WI 10 STATE of Wisconsin, Plaintiff-Respondent, v. Aaron Antonio ALLEN, Defendant-Appellant-Petitioner. No. 2007AP000795. Supreme Court of Wisconsin. Decided February 11, 2010. ¶ 1 PER CURIAM. The members of the court disagree as to the disposition of petitioner Aaron Antonio Allen's motions for the recusal o

{¶ 1} This cause is before the court upon the motions of appellees and cross-appellants, Cincinnati Gas & Electric Co., Dayton Power and Light Co., and Columbus Southern Power Companies, to dismiss the Tax Commissioner’s notice of appeal and to dismiss certain claims or assignments of error set forth in the notice of appeal filed by the Adams County auditor. Appellees and cross-appellants have also filed a motion seeking oral argument on their motion

PER CURIAM: *156Appellant-Cross-Appellee Reed Smith LLP ("Reed Smith") appeals an order from the district court (Naomi R. Buchwald, J. ) enjoining its action for tortious interference and unjust enrichment in New York state court against Wohl & Fruchter LLP ("Wohl & Fruchter"), which dispute arose from the two firms' concurre

Greenberg, J. When the parties were divorced in 1985, their *157separation agreement, which was incorporated but not merged into their divorce judgment, provided that the former husband was to pay alimony to the former wife in the amount of $1,000 per month and child support for two children in the amount of $666 per month. The former wife also received a lump sum propert

*796 MEMORANDUM ALETA A. TRAUGER, District Judge. Pending before the court are motions for summary judgment filed by defendants Walgreen Co. (“Walgreens”) (Docket No. 41), Wal-Mart Stores East, L.P. (“WalMart”) (Docket No. 43), K-Mart Corporation (Docket No. 44), and Tennessee CVS Pharmacy, L.L.C. (“CVS”) (Docket No. 46), to which the plain

355 F.Supp.2d 212 (2005) ESTATE OF Anthony PHILLIPS, et al. Plaintiffs, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, et al. Defendants. No. CIV.A.00-1113(EGS). United States District Court, District of Columbia. January 11, 2005. Babak Movahedi, Washington, DC, Joel Marc Abramson, Law Office of Joel Marc Abramson, Columbia, MD, Ralph Louis Lotkin, Law Offices of Ralph L. Lotkin, Washin

MARC E, JOHNSON, Judge. | fiPlaintiffs/Appellants, Keela Hawkins, et al., appeal the sustaining of a declinato-ry exception of lack of jurisdiction, the granting of a motion .to strike and the denial of a motion for new trial-in favor of Defendants/Appellees, Willow Incorporated (hereinafter referred to .as “Willow, Inc.”) and National Home Insurance Company (A Risk Retention Group) (hereinafter referred to as “NHIC