Cases

DECISION These matters are before the Court on the motion of defendant Women and Infants Hospital of Rhode Island (hereinafter "defendant" or "Hospital") for summary judgment pursuant to Super.R.Civ.P. 56. The plaintiffs — David and Carol Frisina, George and Susan Doyle, and Robert and Vickie Lamontagne — have filed timely objections to the defendant's motion. Facts/Travel

638 A.2d 1047 (1994) John MARCHETTI, Jr., et al. v. Roy PARSONS. No. 92-523-M.P. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. March 21, 1994. Mark S. Mandell, Yvette Boisclair, Mandell, DeLuca & Schwartz, Lauren Jones, Jones Associates, Providence, for plaintiffs. Jeffrey F. Finan, Pawtucket, for defendant. OPINION WEISBERGER, Acting Chief Justi

OPINION Justice Indeglia, for the Court. The plaintiffs, Stephanie Flynn and Louis Silva, individually and in their capacity as co-administrators of the Estate of Alexis Silva (Alexis), and Stephanie Flynn (Flynn) and Dennis Coelho, individually and as parents, natural guar

OPINION It's an all too familiar scenario — a group of high school students manage to procure some alcoholic beverages, act irresponsibly, and someone gets hurt. In this version, however, the injuries did not result from the consumption of illegally obtained alcohol but from a minor igniting it and causing an explosion. The plaintiff, Bridget Selwyn (Selwyn or plaintiff), is the victim in this tragedy, and she sought to recover for her injuries from s

748 A.2d 811 (2000) STATE v. Gregory ACCIARDO. No. 98-429-C.A. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. March 16, 2000. *812 Present WEISBERGER, C.J., and LEDERBERG, BOURCIER, FLANDERS, and GOLDBERG, JJ. Annie Goldberg Aaron L. Weisman, Providence, for Plaintiff. David N. Cicilline, Bristol, for defendant. OPI

DECISION The defendants have filed motions for summary judgment. After hearing on the motions, this justice took the matter under advisement. This medical malpractice action arises out of the death of a fetus that died in utero due to a prolapsed cord. The plaintiffs, Donna and Antonio Fortes (Fortes) allege that the physicians were negligent when they failed to diagnose Donna Fortes's incompetent cervix and to perform a cerclage proce

DECISION The defendants have filed motions for summary judgment. After hearing on the motions, this justice took the matter under advisement. This medical malpractice action arises out of the death of a fetus that died in utero due to a prolapsed cord. The plaintiffs, Donna and Antonio Fortes (Fortes) allege that the physicians were negligent when they failed to diagnose Donna Fortes's incompetent cervix and to perform a cerclage proce

440 F.Supp.2d 81 (2006) Thomas WILSON, Donald P. Twohig, Donald D. Twohig and Thomas Shannahan, Plaintiffs, v. Charles D. MOREAU, in his individual capacity and in his capacity as agent for the City of Central Falls; John Kuzmiski, in his capacity as finance director and treasurer of the City of Central Falls; Richard B. Bessette, individually and his capacity as agent for the City of Central Falls; Martin Joyce, individually and his capacity as

712 A.2d 365 (1998) Donna FLANAGAN et al. v. Conrad WESSELHOEFT, M.D., et al. No. 96-610-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. May 22, 1998. *366 Steven Aaron Robinson, Providence, for Plaintiff. R. Kelly Sheridan, David W. Carroll, Providence, for Defendant. Before WEISBERGER, C.J., and LEDERBERG, FLANDERS, BOURCI

612 A.2d 687 (1992) Beverly OUELLETTE v. Orin V. CARDE et al. No. 90-367-Appeal. Supreme Court of Rhode Island. July 9, 1992. *688 Frederick A. Costello, Warwick, for plaintiff. Amedeo C. Merolla, Katherine A. Merolla, Asquith, Merolla, Anderson, Archetto & Kane, Providence, for defendants. OPINION

36 F.Supp.2d 452 (1999) Mary Y. LIU, Plaintiff, v. Giacomo STRIULI and Providence College, Defendants. C.A. No. 96-0137L. United States District Court, D. Rhode Island. January 19, 1999. *453 *454 *455 *456

754 F.Supp.2d 903 (2010) U.S. CITIZENS ASSOCIATION, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Kathleen SEBELIUS, et al., Defendants. Case No. 5:10 CV 1065. United States District Court, N.D. Ohio, Eastern Division. November 22, 2010. Judgment Entry February 28, 2011. *904 David E. Butz, William G. Williams, Krugliak, Wilkins, Griff

OPINION 1 HEWITT, Chief Judge. This is an action for just compensation filed by owners of property along the eastern shore of Lake Michigan. Plaintiffs’ properties are located along an area of the shoreline that erodes naturally, but allege that the government’s construction and maintenance of a pair of jetties effected a taking by speeding the erosion of

643 P.2d 541 (1982) STATE of Hawaii, Plaintiff-Appellant, v. Stacy P. MELEMAI, Defendant-Appellant. No. 7810. Supreme Court of Hawaii. April 12, 1982. As Amended April 29, 1982. *543 Arthur E. Ross, Deputy Pros. Atty., Honolulu, for plaintiff-appellant. Edwin Y.C. Lum, Deputy Public Defender, Honolulu, for

716 F.Supp.2d 1120 (2010) State of FLORIDA, by and through Bill McCOLLUM, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES DEPARTMENT OF HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES, et al., Defendants. Case No. 3:10-cv-91 RV/EMT. United States District Court, N.D. Florida, Pensacola Division. October 14, 2010. *1126 Bill McCollum, Attorney General of Florida,

54 Cal.App.4th 793 (1997) JOHN B. KILROY, JR., Petitioner, v. THE SUPERIOR COURT OF LOS ANGELES COUNTY, Respondent; SHARON S. CAGLE WINTER, Real Party in Interest. Docket No. B107509. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. April 28, 1997. *797 COUNSEL Wasser, Rosenson & Carter, S. David Rosenso

630 P.2d 583 (1981) The PEOPLE of the State of Colorado, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. David Scott LEE, Defendant-Appellant. No. 80SA314. Supreme Court of Colorado, En Banc. June 15, 1981. Rehearing Denied July 6, 1981. *585 J. D. MacFarlane, Atty. Gen., Richard F. Hennessey, Deputy Atty. Gen., Mary J. Mullarkey, Sol. G

218 F.Supp.2d 1300 (2002) NATIONAL FEDERATION OF REPUBLICAN ASSEMBLIES, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, et al., Defendants. No. CIV.A. 00-0759-RV-C. United States District Court, S.D. Alabama, Southern Division. August 27, 2002. *1301 *1302 *1303<

FRANK A. KAUFMAN, District Judge. Can a Member of Congress who represents a state other than Maryland and who *348maintains an abode in Maryland so that he can perform his duties in Washington, D. C. be subjected to individual income taxation imposed by Maryland and/or its political subdivisions in contravention of 4 U.S.C. § 113? The United States says “No”; Maryland

488 F.Supp. 347 (1980) UNITED STATES of America v. STATE OF MARYLAND; and Louis L. Goldstein, Comptroller of the Treasury of the State of Maryland. Civ. No. K-78-1287. United States District Court, D. Maryland. March 31, 1980. Russell T. Baker, Jr., U. S. Atty. and Gale E. Rasin, Asst. U. S. Atty., Baltimore, Md., M. Carr Ferguson, John J. McCarthy, William L. Shrab