Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
7 opinions for “Marcia Ann Fawcett”
Herstam v. Deloitte & Touche, LLPpublic domain
186 Ariz. 110 (1996) 919 P.2d 1381 Chris HERSTAM, Receiver and Mark D. Tharp, Special Deputy Receiver of Farm & Home Life Insurance Company, an Arizona insurer, in Receivership, Petitioners-Appellees, and James M. Fail and Emily S. Fail, husband and wife; Denny T. Lett and Wynon L. Lett, husband and wife; Charles D. Casper, Clifford G. Smith and Kathryn F. Smith, husband and wife; Harry T. Carneal; Thornton E. Cole; Fred E. Jo
Shively v. Bozanichpublic domain
102 Cal.Rptr.2d 138 (2000) 85 Cal.App.4th 363 Jill SHIVELY, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Peter BOZANICH, as Deputy District Attorney, etc., et al., Defendants and Respondents. Jill Shively, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Brian Patrick Clarke, Defendant and Respondent. Nos. B130905, B133983. Court of Appeal, Second District, Division Three. Decemb
174 F.3d 1087 160 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2650, 137 Lab.Cas. P 10,390,23 Employee Benefits Cas. 1073, 1999 CJ C.A.R. 1703 Terry A. GARVIN; John McGrail; Ferdnand Adamson; EdithAitken; Marva Akins; Douglas R. Allen; Shirley Allen;Loren Alm; Sheila Altman; Cornelious Anderson; Peggy C.Anderson; Claudette B. Anterin; Esther Arnold; Kenneth G.Arsenault; Jerry M. Ashley; Lindy Ashley; Johnice M.
Garvin v. American Telephonepublic domain
F I L E D United States Court of Appeals Tenth Circuit PUBLISH MAR 5 1999 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS PATRICK FISHER Clerk
Buchanan v. Brentwood Federal Savings & Loan Assoc.public domain
Opinion by Mr. Justice Roberts, Appellants are twenty-nine individuals, representing a class of like-situated individuals, who have entered into mortgages with mortgage lending institutions in the Pittsburgh area. This present class action was commenced on December 7, 1971, with a complaint filed by eighteen named plaintiffs against seven banking institutions and the Federal National Mortgage Association (FNMA)
Fox v. Commissionerpublic domain
Nims, Judge-. In these consolidated cases, respondent determined the following deficiencies in petitioners’ Federal income taxes and additions to tax: Docket No. Petitioners Addition to tax Year Deficiency sec. 6653(a)2 3593-81 Stuart I. Fox 1976 $1,900.00
Garvin v. American Telephone & Telegraph Co.public domain
BARRETT, Senior Circuit Judge. Terry A. Garvin, et al., (collectively “Appellants”) appeal from the district court’s grant of summary judgment in favor of American Telephone and Telegraph Company (AT & T) on their claims to recover termination allowances brought pursuant to § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act (LMRA), 29 U.S.C. § 185(a). Facts Appellant