Cases

829 F.2d 227 56 USLW 2170 EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, Appellee,v.LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants, Appellees.American Motorists Insurance Company, Defendant, Appellant.EAGLE-PICHER INDUSTRIES, INC., Plaintiff, Appellant,v.LIBERTY MUTUAL INSURANCE COMPANY, et al., Defendants, Appellees. Nos. 86-1913, 86-1915. Unit

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA BACARDI & COMPANY LIMITED, and BACARDI U.S.A., INC., Plaintiffs, v. EMPRESA CUBANA EXPORTADORA Case No. 1:04-cv-00519 (EGS) DE ALIMENTOS Y PRODUCTOS VARIOS d/b/a CUBAEXPORT, and HAVANA CLUB HOLDING, S.A., d/b/a HCH, S.A., Defendants. MEMORANDUM OPINION Bacardi & Company Limited and Bacardi U.S.A., Incorporated

BOUDIN, Chief Judge. This is a dispute between Boston Gas Company (“Boston Gas”), the largest pro *11 vider of natural gas in the New England area, and one of its insurers, Century Indemnity Company (“Century”). Before natural gas became the primary source of energy in New England, Boston Gas produced

COFFIN, Circuit Judge. When this case between an asbestos manufacturer and its insurance companies was first before us five years ago, we decided that insurance coverage for asbes*231tos-related diseases was triggered when a disease “becomes reasonably capable of medical diagnosis,” Eagle-Picher Industries v. Liberty Mutual Insurance Co., 682 F.2d 12, 25 (1st

104 N.H. 411 (1963) PEERLESS INSURANCE COMPANY v. TRAVELERS INSURANCE COMPANY & a. No. 5079. Supreme Court of New Hampshire. Argued November 8, 1962. Decided February 21, 1963. *412 Faulkner, Plaut, Hanna & Zimmerman (Mr. N. Michael Plaut orally), for the plaintiff. Booth, Wadleigh

31 B.R. 356 (1983) In re Leslie David MORGA and Lisa Carol Morga, Debtors. STATE FARM MUTUAL AUTOMOBILE INSURANCE COMPANY, Plaintiff, v. Ronnie MORGA, Les Morga, Christian Olsen, Karen Maulden, and Christina O'Connor, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 81-01379 M A, Adv. No. 82-0118 M. United States Bankruptcy Court, D. New Mexico. June 27, 1983.

581 F.Supp.2d 413 (2008) Arthur KUDLEK, Haim Avla, Coram Automotive Center, Ltd. and Ghandi Halabi, Plaintiffs, v. SUNOCO, INC. (R & M) and Russell Construction Corp., Defendants. No. 08-CV-00984 (NGG)(WDW). United States District Court, E.D. New York. October 3, 2008. *414 David Ian Roth, Kressel, Rothlein, Walsh & Roth,

LYNCH, Chief Judge. In the second appearance of this case here, the question is whether the trial court abused its discretion in granting a motion for a new trial, after a remand from this court instructing the trial court to address the motion. Jennings v. Jones (Jennings II), 499 F.3d 2 (1st Cir.2007). There was no abuse of discretion and we affirm. *4

984 F.Supp. 811 (1997) Pauline W. GADBOIS, Plaintiff, v. ROCK-TENN CO., MILL DIVISION, INC., Defendant. No. 2:96-CV-176. United States District Court, D. Vermont. November 5, 1997. *812 *813 *814 Mary L. Desautels, Law Offices of Anthony B. Lamb, Burlington

*123MEMORANDUM AND ORDER JOSEPH F. BIANCO, District Judge: Plaintiff Anthony M. Claudio (“plaintiff’ or “Claudio”) filed the instant action against defendant Mattituck-Cutchogue Union Free School District (“defendant” or “District”), alleging gender and age discrimination under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, as amended, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e,

16 F.3d 1493 62 USLW 2564 Robert McANALLY; Delbert Whorton, Appellants,v.John GILDERSLEEVE, Appellee. No. 92-3825. United States Court of Appeals,Eighth Circuit. Submitted Sept. 16, 1993.Decided Feb. 25, 1994.Rehearing and Suggestion for RehearingEn Banc Denied April 7, 1994.

677 F.Supp. 648 (1987) Carol D. SELIGSON, Plaintiff, v. MASSACHUSETTS INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 83-4024-N. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. March 25, 1987. *649 Joan A. Lukey, Hale & Dorr, Boston, Mass., for plaintiff. Robert E. Sullivan, Palmer & Dodge, Boston, Mass., for defen

782 F.Supp.2d 911 (2011) MATTEL, INC., v. MGA ENTERTAINMENT, INC., and Consolidated Actions. Case No. CV 04-9049 DOC (RNBx). United States District Court, C.D. California. January 5, 2011. *940 David M. Stern, Kevin E. Deenihan, Matthew C. Heyn, Klee Tuchin Bogdanoff & Stern LLP, John B. Quinn, Randa A.F. Osman, Rory S. Mille

619 F.Supp. 1465 (1985) EARTH SCIENTISTS (PETRO SERVICES) LTD., Plaintiff, v. UNITED STATES FIDELITY & GUARANTY COMPANY, Defendant. Civ. A. No. 84-2204. United States District Court, D. Kansas. October 17, 1985. *1466 *1467 Jerry K. Levy, Levy, Smith Garrett & Smith, Topeka, Kan., for

934 F.Supp. 1068 (1996) Priscilla M. WAITEK and Marc Waitek, Plaintiffs, v. DALKON SHIELD CLAIMANTS TRUST, Defendant. No. C 85-3051-MWB. United States District Court, N.D. Iowa, Central Division. July 31, 1996. As Amended August 14, 1996. *1069 *1070

BENNETT, Senior Circuit Judge. The Confederated Tribes of the Colville Reservation appeal the judgment of the United States Claims Court in Confederated Tribes v. United States, 20 Cl.Ct. 31 (1990). Therein the Claims Court granted the United States’ (Government) motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, denied the Tribes’ cross motion for partial summary judgment and dismissed their petition wh

964 F.2d 1102 The CONFEDERATED TRIBES OF the COLVILLE RESERVATION,Colville, Lake, Sanpoil-Nespelem, Okanogan, Methow,Columbia, Wenatchee, Chelan, Entiat, Palus, and Joseph'sBand of the Nez Perce Indians, Plaintiffs-Appellants,v.The UNITED STATES, Defendant-Appellee. No. 90-5099. United States Court of Appeals,Federal Circuit. April 29, 1992.Rehear

Levin, J. (dissenting in part and concurring in part). We granted bypass to consider issues concerning the constitutionality and construction of the Hospital Finance Authority Act, 1969 PA 38. The constitutional questions cannot be decided as it is apparent that none of the litigants desires that any aspect of the Act be h

Rosellini, J. This is a consolidated appeal of four individual criminal convictions. Each of the defendants was convicted of a violation of the Uniform Controlled Substances Act, RCW 69.50. We consolidated the appeals to facilitate the resolution of issues which raise constitutional challenges to the statutory prohibitions. We affirm the convictions. Petitioner Anderson was convicted in Cowlitz County Superior

852 F.Supp. 372 (1994) Debra J. DIAMOND v. T. ROWE PRICE ASSOCIATES, INC. No. L-92-1071. United States District Court, D. Maryland. April 28, 1994. *373 *374 *375 *376 Marcy M. Hallock and Elizabeth G. Jacobs, Baltimore,