Cases

POOLER, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. While I agree with almost all of the majority opinion, I would find that the government presented insufficient evidence to support the conviction of Rahad Ross for possession of the cocaine found in the basement of 183 Sixth Street. Because I believe this case is not distinguishable from United States v. Rodrigu

11/23/2022 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs November 1, 2022 RODDAROUS MARCUS BOND v. STATE OF TENNESSEE Appeal from the Circuit Court for Madison County No. C-21-310 Kyle C. Atkins, Judge ___________________________________

PER CURIAM: Marcus D. Thomas appeals the district court’s order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (2012) complaint. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Specifically, we conclude that Thomas has presented no evidence that Defendants fabricated the documents submitted in support of their motion for summary judgment and that the district court did not err in denying Thomas’ motions for appointment of

CORTIÑAS, Judge. We review the trial court’s order granting a new trial based on numerous improper comments made by plaintiffs counsel during closing argument and the cumulative effect of those comments. A trial court’s decision to grant a new trial is reviewed for abuse of discretion. See Engle v. Liggett Group, Inc., 945 So.2d 1246, 1263 (Fla.2006); Murphy v. Int’l Robotic Sys. Inc., 766 So.2d 1010 (Fla

MEMORANDUM OPINION Granting the Dependants’ Partial Motion to Dismiss RICARDO M. URBINA, District Judge. I. INTRODUCTION The plaintiff, a pro se litigant, is a former employee of the Department of the Treasury who alleges that she was the victim of racial discrimination. She se

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas November 16, 2017 No. 04-16-00286-CV Margaret Landen SAKS and Philip M. Ross, Appellants v. Marcus P. ROGERS, A. Chris Heinrichs, J. Barrett Shipp and Heinrichs & De Gennaro, P.C.,

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-16-00286-CV Margaret Landen SAKS and Philip M. Ross, Appellants v. Marcus P. ROGERS, A. Chris Heinrichs, J. Barrett Shipp, and Heinrichs & De Gennaro, P.C.,

Fourth Court of Appeals San Antonio, Texas JUDGMENT No. 04-16-00286-CV Margaret Landen SAKS and Philip M. Ross, Appellants v. Marcus P. ROGERS, A. Chris Heinrichs, J. Barrett Shipp, and Heinrichs & De Gennaro, P.C., App

ACCEPTED 04-16-00286-CV FOURTH COURT OF APPEALS SAN ANTONIO, TEXAS 10/11/2016 4:06:35

487 F.Supp.2d 289 (2007) UNITED STATES of America, v. Glenn MARCUS, Defendant. No. 05-CR-457 (ARR). United States District Court, E.D. New York. May 17, 2007. *290 *291 Pamela Ki Mai Chen, United States Attorney, Brooklyn, NY, Attorney for the United States. Maurice, Secarz, Sercarz &am;

296 S.W.3d 206 (2009) Marjorie ROSS, Joan Seelback, Timothy R. Ross, James R. Ross, Billy R. Ross, and Robert R. Ross, Appellants v. UNION CARBIDE CORPORATION, Appellee. No. 14-07-00860-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, Houston (14th Dist.). August 25, 2009. *208 Marcus D. Pinney, Houston, TX, for appellants. Stephen G. Tipps

ORDER FOR REHEARING EN BANC BY THE COURT: The court having been polled at the request of one of the members of the Court and a majority of the Circuit Judges who are in regular active service not having voted in favor of it (Rule 35, Federal Rules of Appellate Procedure), the Suggestion of Rehearing En Banc is DENIED.

BLACK, Circuit Judge: I. BACKGROUND This case concerns an interpretation of §§ 1692g and 1692e of the Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA). Section 1692g of the FDCPA requires a debt collector to provide a consumer with a notice of debt that contains:

Affirmed in part, reversed in part, and remanded by published opinion. Judge KING wrote the opinion, in which Judge MOTZ and Senior Judge BEEZER joined. OPINION KING, Circuit Judge. Plaintiffs Franks, Cofield, and the Ea-ston Acres Residents Association (the “Plaintiffs”) appeal from the district court’s October 2001 decision dis

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2023-KA-00773-SCT MARCUS L. ROBINSON a/k/a MARCUS LEVON ROBINSON a/k/a MARCUS ROBINSON v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI DATE OF JUDGMENT: 06/02/2023 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. SMITH MURPHEY TRIAL COURT ATTORNEYS: MARVELL MAURICE GORDON STEVEN PATRICK JUBERA JALEESA RENE’ SEALS

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF MISSISSIPPI NO. 2019-KA-00176-COA MARCUS McFARLAND A/K/A MARCUS APPELLANT TRAVELL McFARLAND v. STATE OF MISSISSIPPI APPELLEE DATE OF JUDGMENT: 10/04/2018 TRIAL JUDGE: HON. CHARLES W. WRIGHT JR. COURT FROM WHICH APPEALED: CLARKE COUNTY CIRCUIT COURT

In re Ross, John T., Ill; Rester Courier Service; Scottsdale Ins. Co.;-Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial *1291writs; Parish of East Baton Rouge, 19th Judicial District Court, Div. “J”, No. 439,932; to the Court of Appeal, First Circuit, No. CW98 0034. Denied. MARCUS, J., not on panel.

In re Ross, Gerald; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and/or remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, *1280Div. “J”, No. 382-739; to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, No. 97KA-0357. Denied. JOHNSON, J., would grant the writ. MARCUS, J., not on panel.

In re Ross, Christopher; — Defendant(s); applying for supervisory and remedial writs; Parish of Orleans, Criminal District Court, Div. “K”, Nos. 386-675, 386-674. *428Granted for the sole purpose of transferring the writ to the Court of Appeal, Fourth Circuit, for its consideration. MARCUS, J., not on panel.

02/07/2024 IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS OF TENNESSEE AT JACKSON Assigned on Briefs January 3, 2024 STATE OF TENNESSEE v. MARCUS GREEN Appeal from the Criminal Court for Shelby County Nos. C1806949, 18-05058 Lee V. Coffee, Judge _________________________________