Cases

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 20a0299p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT TIMOTHY L. COLEMAN, ┐ Petitioner-Appellant, │ │

513 F.Supp.2d 206 (2007) Jonathan LOVE v. LAW SCHOOL ADMISSION COUNCIL, INC. Civil Action No. 06-CV-3333. United States District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania. March 9, 2007. Charles Weiner, Law Office of Charles Weiner, Doylestown, PA, Joanne Simon, Law Office of Joanne Simon, Brooklyn, NY, Jennifer Weiser, Lisa Margaret Burger, Sid Wolinsky, Berkeley, CA, for Jonathan

971 A.2d 781 (2009) 114 Conn.App. 799 STATE of Connecticut v. Jason LUTHER. No. 29027. Appellate Court of Connecticut. Argued January 12, 2009. Decided June 9, 2009. *784 Alice Osedach, assistant public defender, for the appellant (defendant). Margaret Gaffney Radionovas, senior ass

OPINION {¶ 1} Appellant, Fredrica Snyder, appeals the judgment entry of the Ashtabula County Court of Common Pleas, Juvenile Division, dated November 7, 2006, which reaffirmed that court's judgment entry, dated February 6, 2006, terminating appellant's *Page 2 parental rights over Alice Kangas and granting appellee, Ashtabula County Children Services Board, permanent

187 F.Supp.2d 1033 (2002) Kristen EAGER, Plaintiff, v. COMMONWEALTH EDISON COMPANY, a domestic and foreign corporation, and its parent Exelon Corporation, a foreign corporation, Defendant. No. 01 C 3159. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. February 20, 2002. *1034 *1035

FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEYS FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEES: WILLIAM J. KAISER MICHAEL H. HAGEDORN MARGARET M. CHRISTENSEN Tell City, Indiana Bingham Greenebaum Doll, LLP Indianapolis, Indiana Jul 15 2014, 10:17 am IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA IN RE: THE GRANDPARENT VISITATION OF ) C.S.N.: )

123 F.3d 490 74 Fair Empl.Prac.Cas. (BNA) 1138,71 Empl. Prac. Dec. P 44,940Alice JANSEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.PACKAGING CORPORATION OF AMERICA, Defendant-Appellee.Kimberly B. ELLERTH, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.BURLINGTON INDUSTRIES, INC., Defendant-Appellee. Nos. 95-3128, 96-1361. United States Court of Appeals,Seventh Circuit. Argued May 15, 199

548 N.W.2d 18 (1996) 4 Neb. App. 726 In re GUARDIANSHIP OF ALICE D. et al., children under 18 years of age. Larry G. BLACK, Appellee, v. NEBRASKA DEPARTMENT OF SOCIAL SERVICES, Appellant, and Tammy D., Appellee. Nos. A-95-1139 through A-95-1142. Court of Appeals of Nebraska. May 28, 1996. *19 Don S

O’Connor, C.J. {¶ 1} In this appeal, we resolve a conflict between the decisions of the Ninth District Court of Appeals and the Second District Court of Appeals concerning the effect of an individual retirement account (“IRA”) custodian’s filing of an interpleader action against competing claimants. We hold that when the custodian o

131 Nev,, Advance Opinion g IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF No. 63284 ROBERT C. MURRAY, DECEASED. POLLY O'NEAL AND GARY STINNETT, PLED Appellants, MAR 0 5 2015 vs. TF3i1CLE K. LINDEMAN JOYCE SLAUGHTER,

131 Nev,, Advance Opinion g IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA IN THE MATTER OF THE ESTATE OF No. 63284 ROBERT C. MURRAY, DECEASED. POLLY O'NEAL AND GARY STINNETT, PLED Appellants, MAR 0 5 2015 vs. TF3i1CLE K. LINDEMAN JOYCE SLAUGHTER,

[Cite as Amaro v. DeMichael, 2024-Ohio-3290.] COURT OF APPEALS LICKING COUNTY, OHIO FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT R. JAMES AMARO, P.C. D/B/A JUDGES: AMARO LAW FIRM : Hon. W. Scott Gwin, P.J. : Hon. William B. Hoffman, J. Plaintiff-Appellant :

Affirmed and Memorandum Opinion filed April 18, 2019. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-18-00952-CV IN THE INTEREST OF A.R.G., A CHILD, Appellant On Appeal from the 314th District Court Harris County, Texas Trial Court Cause No. 2016-04728J MEMORANDUM OPINION T

USCA4 Appeal: 22-7188 Doc: 49 Filed: 02/13/2024 Pg: 1 of 24 PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 22-7188 JAMES ROSEMOND, Petitioner – Appellant, v. RICHARD HUDGINS, Warden, USP Hazelton, Respondent – App

MARGARET DICKSON, ALICIA CHISOLM, ETHEL CLARK, MATTHEW A. McLEAN, MELISSA LEE ROLLIZO, C. DAVID GANTT, VALERIA TRUITT, ALICE GRAHAM UNDERHILL, ARMIN JANCIS, REBECCA JUDGE, ZETTIE WILLIAMS, TRACEY BURNS-VANN, LAWRENCE CAMPBELL, ROBINSON O. EVERETT, JR., LINDA GARROU, HAYES McNEILL, JIM SHAW, SIDNEY E. DUNSTON, ALMA ADAMS, R. STEVE BOWDEN, JASON EDWARD COLEY, KARL BERTRAND FIELDS, PAMLYN STUBBS, DON VAUGHAN, BOB ETHERIDGE, GEORGE GRAHAM, JR., THOMAS M. CHUMLEY, AISHA DEW, G

621 F.3d 406 (2010) Ronald POST, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Margaret BRADSHAW, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 03-4085. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 15, 2010. Decided and Filed: September 13, 2010. *410 ARGUED: Rachel Troutman, Ohio Public Defender's Office, Columbus, Ohio, for Appel

633 F.3d 436 (2011) Raymond TIBBETTS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Margaret BRADSHAW, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 06-3886. United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit. Argued: June 15, 2010. Decided and Filed: February 15, 2011. *437 ARGUED: David L. Doughten, Cleveland, Ohio, for Appellant. Holly E. LeClair,

336 S.C. 568 (1999) 521 S.E.2d 160 In the Matter of William H. GODBOLD, III, Respondent. No. 25001. Supreme Court of South Carolina. Submitted August 3, 1999. Decided September 13, 1999. William H. Godbold, III, of Rock Hill, pro se. Attorney General Charles Molony Condon and Senior Assistant Attorney General James G. Bogle, b

BATCHELDER, J. The respondent, Joseph Mullin, appeals the Superior Court’s (Perkins, J.) approval of the recommendations of the Marital Master (Alice S. Love, Esq.) granting the petitioners’, Martha and Thomas McLaughlin, request for custody of Sabina Mullin. The respondent is Sabina’s father. The petitioners are her maternal grandparents. The respondent argues that the superior court: (1) lacked subject matte

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA STEPHEN P. BOVA, et al. Plaintiffs, Case No. 15-cv-1074 (RCL) v. THE ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION I. INTRODUCTION This action is brought pursuant to the state-sponsored exception to the Foreign Sovereign Immunities Act (“FSIA