Cases

VERMONT SUPERIOR COURT CIVIL DIVISION Orange Unit Case No. 24-CV-00731 5 Court Street Chelsea VT 05038 802-685-4610 www.vermontjudiciary.org Christopher Luce et al v. Matthew Pierson et al ENTRY REGARDING MOTION Title: Motion for Preliminary Injunction (Motion: 4) Filer:

ILLINOIS OFFICIAL REPORTS Appellate Court O’Halloran v. Luce, 2013 IL App (1st) 113735 Appellate Court MARGARET O’HALLORAN, as Special Administrator of the Estate of Caption Henry LeGear, deceased, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. DANA LUCE, Defendant, (Robert F. Harris, Cook County Public Guardian, as Limited Guardian of

148 F.Supp.2d 746 (2001) E & R RUBALCAVA CONSTRUCTION, INC. and Raul Rubalcava, Plaintiffs, v. The BURLINGTON INSURANCE CO., Defendant. No. Civ.A. 3:99-CV-0073-M. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. February 6, 2001. Supplemental Order April 18, 2001. *747 Robert H. Dawson, Jr., John C.

147 F.Supp.2d 523 (2000) E & R RUBALCAVA CONSTRUCTION, INC. and Raul Rubalcava, Plaintiffs, v. THE BURLINGTON INSURANCE CO., Defendant. No. CIV.A. 3:99CV0073M. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. May 25, 2000. *524 Robert H. Dawson, Jr., John C. Tollefson, Stanhope B. Denegre, Goins, Underkofler, Crawfo

Affirmed and Opinion Filed January 25, 2022 In The Court of Appeals Fifth District of Texas at Dallas No. 05-20-00644-CV ALBERT G. HILL, III, Appellant V. MARGARET KELIHER, IN HER CAPACITY AS PERSONAL REPRESENTATIVE AND SUCCESSOR INDEPENDENT EXECUTOR OF THE ESTATE OF ALBERT G. HILL, JR., AND CAROL E. IRWIN, IN HER CA

345 F.3d 742 Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Appellee,v.Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Defendant-Appellant.Equal Employment Opportunity Commission, Plaintiff-Appellant,v.Luce, Forward, Hamilton & Scripps, Defendant-Appellee. No. 00-57222. No. 01-55321. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Martin, J. The plaintiff contends that the appellant, as surety on the guardian’s bond, is liable for all defaults of the guardian, regardless of when such defaults occurred. The appellant contends that, since the bond was furnished in connection with the proceedings for the sale of the ward’s real estate, liability under the bond is limited tO’ a proper accounting for the proceeds received from such sale. If the obligation of th

358 B.R. 868 (2006) In re AVADO BRANDS, INC., f/k/a Apple South, Inc., et al., debtors. William Kaye, Trustee of Avado Brands, Inc. Litigation Trust, Plaintiff, v. Thomas E. Dupree, Jr., Louis J. Profumo, Margaret E. Waldrep, Erich J. Booth, Jerome A. Atkinson, William V. Lapham, Emilio Alverez-Recio and Robert Sroka, Defendants. Bankruptcy No. 04-31555HDH-11. Adversary No. 05-3823. United States B

CHARLES SCHWARTZ, Jr., District Judge. Before the Court is defendant Crescent City, E.M.S., Inc’s (“Crescent City’s”) Motion to Dismiss Count I and II of the Complaint in the above-captioned matter, for alleged failure to plead fraud with particularity pursuant to FRCP 9(b). For reasons hereinafter stated, the Court denies Crescent City’s motion, and, in order at this time to avoid dismissal of Counts I and II, grants to pla

79 Cal.Rptr.2d 13 (1998) 67 Cal.App.4th 339 Christopher G. SHEPPARD, Plaintiff and Appellant, v. Lou FREEMAN et al., Defendants and Respondents. No. D025818. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. October 19, 1998. Rehearing Denied November 12, 1998. Review Denied February 3, 1999.[*] Haas

FERNANDEZ, Circuit Judge: Richard J. Carroll, dba R.J. Carroll Co., fdba R.J. Carroll & Associates (“Carroll”), a debtor in Chapter 11 proceedings, appeals from the Bankruptcy Appellate Panel’s (“BAP”) affirmance of the bankruptcy court’s order denying Carroll’s request for a temporary restraining order enjoining the termination of a management agreement between Carroll and Tri-Growth Centre City, Ltd. (“Tri-Growth”).

OPINION AND ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART UNIVERSITY DEFENDANTS’ MOTION TO DISMISS, DENYING CANTRELL PLAINTIFFS’ MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, GRANTING ATTORNEY GENERAL’S MOTION FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT, AND DISMISSING CONSOLIDATED CASES DAVID M. LAWSON, District Judge. The plaintiffs in these consolidated actions challenge the constitutionality of an amendment to Michigan’s state constitu

792 F.Supp. 514 (1992) ANAGO INCORPORATED and Timothy J. McKibben, Plaintiff, v. TECNOL MEDICAL PRODUCTS, INC., Capital Southwest Venture Corp., Patrick Hamner, Joel Douglas Inman, and Margaret Kathryn Inman, Defendants. Civ. A. No. 3-92-250-H. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. February 26, 1992. T. Richard Handler, Stephen E. Fox, Jenkens &

*37SUMMARY ORDER Plaintiff-appellants Eligió Cedeño and Cedel International Investment Ltd. (Collectively “Cedeño”) appeals from an order and partial final judgment entered on September 13, 2010, by the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York (Rakoff, /.), dismissing his case as to the defendants-appellees for failure to state a claim pursuant to Rule 12(b

MEMORANDUM OPINION & ORDER ANNA DIGGS TAYLOR, Chief Judge. Before the court is a facial challenge to amendments to a Michigan statute governing the dissemination, exhibition and display of sexually explicit materials deemed harmful to minors. 2003 Mich. Public Act 192, M.C.L. §§ 722.671(a), (b) and (e), 722.675 and 722.677; M.S.A. §§ 25.254(1)(a),(b) and (e),(5), (7) (herein

763 F.Supp. 1196 (1990) Charmaine S. EICKHORST, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The E.F. HUTTON GROUP, INC. and John P. Holmes, Defendants. Eileen WINEGARD, et al., Plaintiffs, v. The E.F. HUTTON GROUP, INC. and John P. Holmes, Defendants. Nos. 88 Civ. 3002 (RJW), 88 Civ. 7473 (RJW). United States District Court, S.D. New York. January 11, 1990.

Dillard, Chief Judge. *76Following a trial by jury, David Billy McAllister, Jr. was convicted of rape, incest, and making a false statement to law enforcement, and then sentenced as a recidivist. McAllister appeals from his convictions, arguing that the trial court erred by (1) admitting evidence of a prior conviction for statutory rape; (2) denyi

JACOBS, Circuit Judge: Plaintiffs-appellants appeal from so much of a judgment in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York, John M. Walker, Circuit Judge, sitting by designation, 735 F.Supp. 1196, as (a) granted summary judgment to defendant E.F. Hutton Group, Inc. (“Hutton”) on plaintiffs-appellants’ claim that they were sold unsuitable securities in violation of Section 10(b) of the

YloU. M, &>i$ FILEDtN COURTOr APPEALS 12T Coi*i ofApoeais 3S5i fat*: &/i<2fatn // J^u5t~ TEXAS PAW ESTES, CLERK J_ amA J« uMttf- stc < ^ Zulus L<^ 7/6 teMu#4\ fa U6, hM iJclfy tuld 'to

129 F.Supp.2d 984 (2001) Margaret LeAnn RIMES, Plaintiff, v. CURB RECORDS, INC. and LeAnn Rimes Entertainment, Inc., Defendant. No. CIV. A. 300-CV-2504R. United States District Court, N.D. Texas, Dallas Division. January 10, 2001. George Tomas Rhodus, Looper Reed Mark & McGraw, Dallas, TX, for Margaret LeAnn Rimes. Monroe David Bryant, Jr., Hughes & L