Cases

Filed 5/7/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2020 ND 102 Larry William Hewitt, Appellant v. Ronald Henke, Interim Director, Department of Transportation, Appellee No. 20190389 Appeal from the District Court of Stutsman County, Southeast Judicial District, th

Filed 4/6/20 by Clerk of Supreme Court IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA 2020 ND 76 Kyle Al Christianson, Appellant v. Ronald Henke, Interim Director, Department of Transportation, Appellee No. 20190348 Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial D

ERICKSTAD, Chief Justice. The County Court of Eddy County entered a judgment on September 17, 1980, denying a request by Frank J. Hitz for an order requiring the administrator of the John Hitz estate to execute a deed conveying to Frank the quarter section of farmland described by paragraph four of John’s last will and testament. Frank appealed to the district court which entered a judgment, on August 14, 1981, affirming the

Pacella v Town of Newburgh Volunteer Ambulance Corps. Inc. (2018 NY Slip Op 05854) Pacella v Town of Newburgh Volunteer Ambulance Corps. Inc. 2018 NY Slip Op 05854 Decided on August 22, 2018 Appellate Division, Second Department

200 N.W.2d 50 (1972) Elaine TRENGEN, as Guardian of the Persons and Estates of Louis J. Mongeon and Margaret E. Mongeon, and Louis J. Mongeon and Margaret E. Mongeon, individually, Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Pearl MONGEON, Defendant and Respondent. Civ. No. 8811. Supreme Court of North Dakota. June 1, 1972. *51 Duffy & Hau

206 N.W.2d 284 (1973) Elaine TRENGEN, as Guardian of the Persons and Estates of Louis J. Mongeon and Margaret E. Mongeon, et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. Pearl MONGEON, Defendant and Respondent. Civ. No. 8811. Supreme Court of North Dakota. February 15, 1973. Rehearing Denied April 12, 1973. *285 Duffy &

SANDSTROM, Justice. [¶ 1] Several owners of land next to navigable waters in North Dakota appeal from summary judgments determining the State owns the mineral interests under the land in the shore zone, the area between the ordinary high and low watermarks of the navigable waters. We conclude that the State owned the mineral interests under the shore zone of navigable waters upo

VANDE WALLE, Chief Justice. [¶ 1] The State, by the Department of Labor for the benefit of Evert Johnson *292(“State”), appealed from a summary judgment dismissing its discriminatory housing practice action against Matrix Properties Corporation, formerly known as E.W. Wylie Corporation, Wild & Associates, Ltd., and Ulteig Engineers, Inc. (collectively “Matrix”), o

20 S.W.3d 741 (2000) ABRAXAS PETROLEUM CORPORATION, and Abraxas Production Corporation, Appellants, v. John H. HORNBURG and Gwendolyn Hornburg Hauter, and Marian C. Guiberson, Appellees. No. 08-98-00286-CV. Court of Appeals of Texas, El Paso. March 16, 2000. *746 Margaret Blair Sullivan, Cox & Smith Inc., San Antonio, for App

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN 4444444444444444444444 ON REHEARING 4444444444444444444444 NO. 03-08-00473-CV Appellant, Employees Retirement System of Texas// Cross-Appellant, The Putnam Advisory Company, LLC v. Appellees, Putnam, LLC, d/b/a P

152 N.W.2d 95 (1967) Margaret ORWICK, Plaintiff and Petitioner, v. Glenn ORWICK, Defendant and Respondent. Civ. No. 8418. Supreme Court of North Dakota. June 21, 1967. *96 Conmy, Conmy & Feste, Fargo, for plaintiff and petitioner. Duffy & Haugland, Devils Lake, for defendant and respondent. STRUTZ, Judge.

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN ON REHEARING NO. 03-08-

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00473-CV Appellant, Employees Retirement System of Texas // Cross-Appellant, The Putnam Advisory Company, LLC

TEXAS COURT OF APPEALS, THIRD DISTRICT, AT AUSTIN NO. 03-08-00473-CV Appellant, Employees Retirement System of Texas // Cross-Appellant, The Putnam Advisory Company, LLC v. Appellees, Putnam, LLC, d/b/a Putnam Investments; Putnam Investment Management, LLC; and The Putnam Advisory Company, LLC // Cross-Appellee, Employees Retirement

16 Wn. App. 718 (1977) 559 P.2d 18 THE PORT OF SEATTLE, Respondent, v. SEVERINO D. RIO, Appellant. No. 4217-43729-1. The Court of Appeals of Washington, Division One. January 10, 1977. *719 Richard D. Harris, Short, Cressman & Cable, Douglas R. Hartwich, and Margaret A. Evans, for appella

WIDENER, Circuit Judge: On July 26, 1988, the bankruptcy court and the district court jointly confirmed the “Sixth Amended and Restated Plan of Reorganization” (the Plan) submitted by A.H. Robins Company, Inc. (Robins). In Re A.H. Robins Co. Inc., 88 B.R. 742 (E.D.Va. 1988). Rosemary Menard-Sanford and certain other personal injury claimants, who voted against the Plan, appeal. -They challenge the district court’s a

880 F.2d 694 19 Bankr.Ct.Dec. 997, Bankr. L. Rep. P 72,955 In re A.H. ROBINS COMPANY, INCORPORATED, Debtor. (Eight Cases.)Rosemary MENARD-SANFORD; Karen Valenzuela; ConstanceMiller Engelsberg; Nancy Lauri Adams; CarolynHarris, Claimants-Appellants,v.Ralph R. MABEY; The Official Committee of Equity SecurityHolders; The Official Unsecured Creditors Committee of A.H.Robins Company, Incor

1 Reported in 177 P.2d 689. The defendant was convicted of the crime of subornation of perjury. His motion for a dismissal for insufficiency of the evidence at the close of the state's case was denied. Motions for a directed verdict, in arrest of judgment, for a new trial, and for a suspended judgment were likewise denied, whereupon the defendant appeals. Subornation of perjury

ACCEPTED 15-25-00120-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 10/16/2025 11:54 AM No. 15-25-000120-CV CHRISTOPHER A. PRINE