Cases

814 F.Supp.2d 102 (2011) Esmelinda PÉREZ, Plaintiff, v. SAINT JOHN'S SCHOOL, Defendant. Civil No. 09-2170 (DRD). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 30, 2011. *105 Manuel Duran-Rodriguez, Manuel Duran Law Office, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Martha L. Martinez-Rodriguez, Olga Y. Cabrera-Ramos, Linda S.

FILED 15-0547 7/24/2015 5:49:28 PM tex-6223072 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS BLAKE A. HAWTHORNE, CLERK

ACCEPTED 15-25-00012-cv FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 3:13 PM No. 15-25-00012-CV

RECOMMENDED FOR PUBLICATION Pursuant to Sixth Circuit I.O.P. 32.1(b) File Name: 21a0168p.06 UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SIXTH CIRCUIT ┐ MICHAEL THREAT; MARGARITA NOLAND-MOORE; │ PAMELA BEAVERS; LAWRENCE WALKER; REGINALD

HOWARD, Chief Judge. The appellants are three shipping operators who pay a fee to Puerto Rico to conduct business out of the Port of San Juan. The Commonwealth supplied each company with cargo-scanning technology, required them to scan all of their inbound cargo, and then charged each an additional fee. The question on appeal is whether the dormant Commerce Clause bars Puer-to Ric

FILED United States Court of Appeals PUBLISH Tenth Circuit UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS November 9, 2018 Elisabeth A. Shumaker FOR THE TENTH CIRCUIT Cl

USCA11 Case: 21-14132 Document: 69-1 Date Filed: 10/25/2023 Page: 1 of 34 [PUBLISH] In the United States Court of Appeals For the Eleventh Circuit ____________________ No. 21-14132 ____________________ RICARDO SANCHEZ, as Personal Re

OPINION AND ORDER DANIEL R. DOMINGUEZ, District Judge. Ponce de Leon Hospitality Corp. (“H.I. Ponce”) and H.I. Mayagüez, Inc. (“HI. Mayagüez”) (collectively “Plaintiffs”), brought the instant action against Avalon Logistics Inc., et ah1 pursuant to the Car-mack Amendment to the Interstate Commerce Act and its’ attendant regulation2, for the loss or

Delgado-Hernández, District Judge. This is an action for damages under Puerto Rico law predicated on diversity of citizenship pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1332 (Docket Nos. 1 and 28). Before the court are two motions for summary judgment, one seeking dismissal of third-party claims as a result of a settlement agreement

OPINION YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice. . The Prudential Insurance Company and Pruco Life Insurance Company (collectively “Pruco”) appeal a judgment entered against them in favor of Irasema Sagarna-ga Durante (“Sagarnaga”). This case *502arises out of Pruco’s non-payment of life insurance proceeds based on a rejected change of beneficiary

Filed 1/21/20 CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION* IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT NOLTE SHEET METAL, INC., F076389 Plaintiff and Appellant, (Super. Ct. No. 16CECG03592) v. OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH

In the United States Court of Federal Claims Nos. 16-1624L; 17-1931L; 17-468L; 17-4680L Filed: March 1, 2023 * * * * * * * * * ** * * ** * REINALDO CASTILLO, et al., * * Plaintiffs, * v. * * UNITED STATES, *

John W. Utton, Utton & Kery, P.A., Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of Santa Fe County. Marcos D. Martinez, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the City of Santa Fe. Larry C. White, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed a response brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the Rio de Tes

John W. Utton, Utton & Kery, P.A., Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of Santa Fe County. Marcos D. Martinez, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed an answer brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the City of Santa Fe. Larry C. White, Santa Fe, New Mexico, filed a response brief and a supplemental brief on behalf of the Rio de Tesuque Association, Inc. Scott B. McEl

COURT OF APPEALS EIGHTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS EL PASO, TEXAS THE PRUDENTIAL INSURANCE § COMPANY OF AMERICA and PRUCO No. 08-12-00077-CV LIFE INSURANCE COMPANY, § Appellants/Cross-Appellees, Appeal from the § v.

OPINION AND ORDER GUSTAVO A. GELPI, United States District Judgei After twelve years of litigation in this First Amendment case involving the rights *342of Jehovah’s Witnesses, the Court is at a crossroad regarding a widely-debated question of Puerto Rico real property law. Are roads in gated urbanizations of private or

OPINION NELVA GONZALES RAMOS, District Judge. The right to vote: It defines our nation as a democracy. It is the key to what Abraham Lincoln so famously extolled as a “government of the people, by the people, [and] for the people.”1 The Supreme Court of the United States, placing the power of the right to vote in context, explained: “Especially since the right to ex

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER SIDNEY B. BROOKS, Bankruptcy Judge. TABLE OF CONTENTS I. Introduction .690 II. Summary.691 A. A Summary of this Opinion.691 B. The Enactment of 11 U.S.C. § 110 in the Reform Act of 1994 .692 C. The 2005 Amendments .693 D. The Unintended Consequences of 11 U.S.C. § 110.694

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF CALIFORNIA In re N.R., a Person Coming Under the Juvenile Court Law. LOS ANGELES COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF CHILDREN AND FAMILY SERVICES, Plaintiff and Respondent, v. O.R., Defendant and Appellant. S274943 Second Appellate District, Division Five B312001 Los Angeles County Superior Cour

ACCEPTED 15-25-00013-CV FIFTEENTH COURT OF APPEALS AUSTIN, TEXAS 8/8/2025 12:26 PM No. 15-25-00013-CV