Cases

Estado Libre Asociado de Puerto Rico TRIBUNAL DE APELACIONES PANEL IX Eric M. Levins CERTIORARI procedente del Recurrido Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala de vs. KLCE202300450 Bayamón Cristina M. Mén

BACHARACH, Circuit Judge. A group of employees filed class and collective actions against Tyson Foods, Inc., seeking unpaid wages for time spent on pre- and post-shift activities. After the employees obtained a sizeable verdict and fee award, 1 Tyson unsuccessfully moved for judgment as a matter of law. On appeal, Tys

MURPHY, Circuit Judge. Defendants-appellants Tyson Foods, Inc. and Tyson Fresh Meats, Inc. (collectively, “Tyson”) appeal from the district court’s interlocutory order denying their motion for partial summary judgment. We ordered the parties to submit briefs addressing whether this appeal should be dismissed on the ground that the order appealed from was not final. Tyson argues that we have jurisdiction over the appeal under

NUMBER 13-21-00114-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI – EDINBURG IN THE INTEREST OF A.M.M., M.A.M., K.A.M., J.G.M., J.E.M., AND J.I.M.P., CHILDREN On appeal from the 138th District Court of Cameron County, Texas. MEMORANDUM OPINIO

OPINION AND ORDER Enrique S. Lamoutte, United States Bankruptcy Judge This adversary proceeding is before the court upon the Motion to Dismiss (Docket No. 34) filed by co-defendants, Francisco J. Amundaray-Rodriguez, Esq. and Maria E. Villares-Señeriz, Esq., (hereinafter referred to as the “Defendants”) arguing: (i) lack of subject matter jurisdiction pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 12(b)(1) and

534 F.3d 1320 (2008) Adelina GARCIA; Antonio Garcia; Jeronimo Vargas-Vera; Efrain Aguilar; Paulina Aguilar; Adelaida Aguirre; Jose R. Aguirre; Salvador Almanza; Miguel Amaya; Rogelio Andrade; Jesus Anguiano; Efigenia Arana; Jose R. Arana; Ramon Arana; Alma Armendariz; Jorge L. Banda Valadez; Delfino Barragan; Lucia Barragan; Ramon P. Barragan; Holga Benitez; Baltazar Bonilla; Maria Guadalupe Bonilla; Catalina Bustillos; Bernardo Calderon; Etelvina Calder

Pabón Chameco, Jueza Ponente *598TEXTO COMPLETO DE LA RESOLUCION Comparecen ante nos, Aníbal Morales García, Aurea Esther Rivera Díaz, la Sociedad Legal de Gananciales compuesta por ambos y Cajava Development, en adelante, señor Morales, solicitando la revisión de una Orden emitida por el Tribunal de Primera Instancia, Sala Superior de Ponce. Mediante dich

T. MICHAEL PUTNAM, UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE MEMORANDUM OPINION and ORDER This matter is before the court on Plaintiff's Motion to Vacate Order and Reinstate Case, filed on September 12, 2018 (doc. 18), and the Motion to Reinstate, Motion to Intervene, and Motion to Enforce Attorney's Lien (doc. 20), filed on October 3, 2018 by Steven Mezrano and the Mezrano Law Firm P.C. A hearing was

286 F.Supp.2d 1352 (2003) Rizalyn BAUTISTA, etc., et al. Paul Peralta Raymond Lovino Ronaldo Marcelino Rolando Tejero Abdi Comedia Cristina L. Valenzuela, etc., et al. Marilen S. Bernal, etc., et al. Willy I. Villanueva, etc., et al. Maria Garcia L. Rosal, etc., et al. Plaintiffs, v. STAR CRUISES and NORWEGIAN CRUISE LINE, LTD., Defendants. No. 03-21642-CIV., 03-21643-CIV., 03-21644-CIV., 03-21645-CIV., 03-21646-CIV., 03-216

417 B.R. 419 (2009) In re IFS FINANCIAL CORPORATION, Debtor(s). W. Steve Smith, Trustee, Plaintiff(s) v. Ramon Garcia Suarez, Defendant(s). Bankruptcy No. 02-39553. Adversary Nos. 04-03745, 04-03757, 04-03768, 04-03775, 04-03803. United States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. Texas, Houston Division. September 9, 2009. *427 Blanche Due

LYNCH, Circuit Judge. Bernice Aponte-Rodríguez and her husband, Victor Lebrón-Ríos, appeal the “with prejudice” aspect of the district court’s dismissal with prejudice of their employment discrimination claims under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964, 42 U.S.C. § 2000e et seq. (2000). The district court ordered dismissal because the plaintiffs failed to file charges of discrimination with the Equal Employment O

ACCEPTED 08-24-00024-CV 08-24-00024-CV EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS EL PASO, TEXAS 10/30/2024 3:34 PM

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER Cathy Bissoon, United States District Judge I. MEMORANDUM For the reasons that follow, Defendant’s Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 39) will be granted. Jerae Palmer (“Palmer” or “Plaintiff’) brings this lawsuit against Federal Express Corporation (“FedEx” or “Defendant”), under the Americans with Disabilities Act (“ADA”), 42 U.S.C. § 12112, et

NUMBER 13-15-00296-CV COURT OF APPEALS THIRTEENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS CORPUS CHRISTI - EDINBURG IN RE BENEVIS, LLC, DENTRISTRY OF BROWNSVILLE, P.C., AND KOOL SMILES, P.C. On Petition for Writ of Mandamus. MEMORANDUM OPINION Before Chief Justice Valdez, Benavides, and

671 F.Supp.2d 300 (2009) Nitza I. COLON-FONTANEZ, Plaintiff, v. MUNICIPALITY OF SAN JUAN; Jane Doe and John Doe Companies X, Y, Z, Defendants. Civil No. 07-2142 (FAB). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. December 2, 2009. *305 Vilma M. Dapena-Rodriguez, Vilma Maria Dapena Law Office, Bayamon, PR, for Plaintiff. A

PUBLISHED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT No. 18-1521 CASA DE MARYLAND; COALITION FOR HUMANE IMMIGRANT RIGHTS (CHIRLA); FAIR IMMIGRATION MOVEMENT (FIRM); ONE AMERICA; PROMISE ARIZONA; MAKE THE ROAD PENNSYLVANIA; MICHIGAN UNITED; ARKANSAS UNITED COMMUNITY COALITION; JUNTA FOR PROGRESSIVE ACTION, INC.; ANGEL AGUILUZ; ESTEFANY RODRIGUEZ; HEYMI ELVIR MALDO

161 F.Supp.2d 915 (2001) In the Matter of the EXTRADITION OF: Lauro Soto SALAS, Maurilio Soto Campa, Meliton Soto Campa, and Pablo Soto Campa, Defendants. No. 96 M 28. United States District Court, N.D. Illinois, Eastern Division. September 25, 2001. *916 *917 Gerardo S. Gutierrez, Chicago, IL, for Pl

200 F.Supp.2d 50 (2002) Victor LEBRON-RIOS, et al, Plaintiff(s), v. The U.S. MARSHAL SERVICE, et al, Defendant(s). Civil No. 01-2716 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. April 24, 2002. *51 Benito Gutierrez-Diaz, Fajardo, PR, for plaintiffs. Fidel A. Sevillano-Del-Rio, U.S Attorney's Office San Juan, PR, Vi

OPINION This is both an interlocutory appeal and a petition for writ of mandamus from a trial-court order transferring the venue of probate proceedings from Bexar County to Harris County. We have consolidated these proceedings. In re Valero Energy Corp., 968 S.W.2d 916, 917 (Tex. 1998) (orig.proceeding). We dismiss the appeal for want of jurisdiction and deny the petition f

YVONNE T. RODRIGUEZ, Justice More than fifty property owners and apartment residents sued the Water District for property damage and personal injury as a result of a breach in a canal. The Water District filed a plea to the jurisdiction based on governmental immunity. The trial court denied the Water District's plea. This is an interlocutory appeal whereby the Water District appeals the trial court's denial of its plea to the jurisd