Cases

Honorable David C. Bury, United States District Judge *886Adoption in Part and Modification in Part: SY 2016-17 SMAR & Unitary Status Table of Contents Historical Perspective: Unitary Status Review...887 Special Master's 2016-17 Annual Review (SMAR): Unitary Status Review...889

(2008) Roy and Josie FISHER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Anita Lohr, et al., Defendants, and Sidney L. Sutton, et al., Defendants-Intervenors, Maria Mendoza, et al., Plaintiffs, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Tucson Unified School District No. One, et al., Defendants. Nos. CV 74-90 TUC DCB, CV 74-204 TUC DCB.

502 F.Supp.2d 1033 (2006) Roy and Josie FISHER, et al., Plaintiffs, v. UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Anita Lohr, et al., Defendants, and Sidney L. Sutton, et al., Defendants-Intervenors, Maria Mendoza, et al., Plaintiffs, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Tucson Unified School District No. One, et al., Defendants. Nos. CV 74-90 TUC DCB, CV 74-204 TUC DCB.

652 F.3d 1131 (2011) Roy FISHER; Josie Fisher; Maria Mendoza, Edward A. Contreras, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant-Appellee, Sidney L. Sutton; Sally J. Sutton; John R. Centeno; Mary Katherine Centeno; Librada G. Ruiz; Sidney Taize, Defendant-intervenors-Appellees, v. United States of America, Plaintiff-intervenor. Roy Fisher; Josie Fisher, Plaintiffs-Appellants, and Maria Mendoza; Edward A.

*972 FISHER, Circuit Judge. In 1998, after nearly 10 years of service at Laguna Honda Hospital (“hospital”) as a physician, John R. Ulrich, Jr., M.D., began protesting a decision by the San Francisco Department of Health to lay off a class of physicians at the hospital. He was not in the affected classifi

OPINION OF THE COURT FISHER, Circuit Judge. D.E., now 23 years of age, was a minor diagnosed with a learning disability and enrolled in school in the Central Dauphin School District (“Central Dauphin”). D.E.’s parents, Maria English and Ronald Sheffy, claimed that while D.E. was enrolled in Central Dauphin he was deprived of a free appropriate public educa

703 F.Supp.2d 374 (2010) Isadore FISHER, on Behalf of Himself and a Class of Persons Similarly Situated, and on Behalf of the JP Morgan Chase 401(k) Savings Plan, and Janna M. Wooten, Kelli M. Bunn, Tammy T. Soileau and Amy K. Harvey, Plaintiffs, v. JP MORGAN CHASE & CO., J.P. Morgan Investment Services, the Plan Investment Management Committee, the Benefits Fiduciary Committee, Ina R. Drew, Dina Dublon, Patrick L. Edsparr, John J. Farrell, P

—In an action to foreclose a mortgage on real property, the plaintiff appeals from (1) an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Winick, J.), dated July 17, 1995, which granted the motion of the defendants David Ferguson and Patricia Emma Ferguson to vacate a judgment of foreclosure and sale dated October 1, 1990, as amended by order dated December 12, 1990, and in effect vacated a stipulation entered into by the plaintiff and the respondents and (2) so

Fuentes v Fisher (2022 NY Slip Op 06469) Fuentes v Fisher 2022 NY Slip Op 06469 Decided on November 16, 2022 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.

SUMMARY ORDER The plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion to certify a proposed class of plaintiffs and its grant of *981the defendants’ subsequent motion for summary judgment in this action brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, Pub.L. 93-406, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 829 (“ERISA”). The plaintiffs are current or for

SUMMARY ORDER The plaintiffs appeal from the district court’s denial of their motion to certify a proposed class of plaintiffs and its grant of *981the defendants’ subsequent motion for summary judgment in this action brought pursuant to the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974, Pub.L. 93-406, Sept. 2, 1974, 88 Stat. 829 (“ERISA”). The plaintiffs are current or for

821 F.Supp. 1342 (1993) Roy & Josie FISHER, et al., Plaintiffs, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. Anita LOHR, et al., and Sidney L. Sutton, et al., Defendants-Intervenors. Maria MENDOZA, et al., Plaintiffs, United States of America, Plaintiff-Intervenor, v. TUCSON UNIFIED SCHOOL DISTRICT NO. 1, et al., Defendants. No. CIV 74-090, CIV 74-204. United State

OPINION & ORDER STEIN, District Judge. Plaintiffs Isadore Fisher, Janna M. Wooten, Kelli M. Bunn, Tammy T. Soileau and Amy K. Harvey have brought this action for alleged breaches of fiduciary duty in violation of section 409(a) of the Employee Retirement Income Security Act of 1974 (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1109(a). Plaintiffs, who are present and former participants in JP Morgan Chase & Co.’

Opinion for the'Court filed by Circuit Judge KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON. KAREN LeCRAFT HENDERSON, Circuit Judge: Fraud is infinite in variety; sometimes it is audacious and unblushing; sometimes it pays a sort of homage to virtue, and then it is modest and retiring; it would be honesty itself if it could only afford it. But fraud is fraud all

People v Cha-Narion D. (2024 NY Slip Op 05917) People v Cha-Narion D. 2024 NY Slip Op 05917 Decided on November 27, 2024 Appellate Division, Third Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.<

Matter of Reyes v Fisher (2020 NY Slip Op 01351) Matter of Reyes v Fisher 2020 NY Slip Op 01351 Decided on February 26, 2020 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuan

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT MARIA MENDOZA, Individually and No. 22-16478 on behalf of Stephen Mendoza; EDWARD A. CONTRERAS, D.C. No. 4:74-cv-00090- Plaintiffs-Appellants, DCB UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, OPINION Intervenor-Plaintiff- Appellee, and RO

IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF IOWA No. 23-1140 Filed February 5, 2025 STATE OF IOWA, Plaintiff-Appellee, vs. ROBERT ALLEN FISHER JR., Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________ Appeal from the Iowa District Court for Linn County, Justin Lightfoot, Judge. A criminal defendant challenges the sufficiency of the evidence supporting his conviction

United States Court of Appeals FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA CIRCUIT Argued October 20, 2023 Decided May 10, 2024 No. 22-5150 MARIA ESPARRAGUERA, APPELLANT v. DEPARTMENT OF THE ARMY, ET AL., APPELLEES Consolidated with 23-5002 Appeals from the United States District Court for the District of Columbia

PER CURIAM. Affirmed.