Cases

OPINION AND ORDER FUTEY, Judge. This matter comes before the Court on the motion of defendant, the United States, for partial summary judgment, under Rule 56 of the Rules of the United States Court of Federal Claims (“RCFC”). Defendant leased a residence in Juárez, Chihuahua, Mexico from plaintiff, Maria Sandra Fernandez de Iglesias. According to plaintiff, defendant failed to vacate at the end

ACCEPTED 08-21-00145-CV EIGHTH COURT OF APPEALS 08-21-00145-CV EL PASO, TEXAS 11/2/2021 2:51 PM

SCMF-XX-XXXXXXX IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I In the Matter of the JULY 2023 EXAMINATION FOR ADMISSION TO THE BAR OF THE STATE OF HAWAI#I NOTICE OF PASSING THE HAWAI#I BAR EXAMINATION The applicants listed below are hereby notified that each has passed the July 2023 Hawai#i examination for admission to the Bar of the State of H

In the Court of Appeals Second Appellate District of Texas at Fort Worth ___________________________ No. 02-23-00435-CV ___________________________ DANIEL VILLANUEVA, Appellant V. RNA FINANCIAL LLC, Appellee On Appeal from the 352nd District Court Tarrant County, Texas Trial Court No. 352-325638-21 Before Sudderth, C.J.; Womack and Walker, JJ. Memorandum Opinion by Justice Womack

TRANSFER ORDER JOHN G. HEYBURN II, Chairman. *1355Before the Panel: * Pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1407, plaintiff in an action (Christopher) pending in the Middle District of Louisiana moves to centralize this litigation in the District of South Carolina. The litigation encompasses the 56 actions listed on Sched

PER CURIAM. Pro se claimant Jorge Suárez-Maya appeals a district court judgment that orders the forfeiture of certain property to the government as the “proceeds” of drug transactions, see 21 U.S.C. § 881(a)(6), and requires the government to pay claimant one third of the forfeiture sale’s proceeds.

FILED 17-1010 6/12/2020 3:06 PM tex-43709304 SUPREME COURT OF TEXAS

BY THE COURT: On November 2, 2018, we denied the Emergency Motion for Stay of Injunction Pending Appeal filed by Appellant Brian Kemp and advised at that time that one judge dissented and separate opinions would follow. Today, we issue those opinions. JILL PRYOR, Circuit Judge, concurring in the denial of the motion for a stay. On the eve of the 2018 general election, and in the wake of a surge in

ACCEPTED 01-15-00989-CV FIRST COURT OF APPEALS HOUSTON, TEXAS 12/3/2015 1:47:58 PM

MEMORANDUM OPINION AND ORDER James 0. Browning, UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE THIS MATTER comes before the Court on the Plaintiffs’ Motion for Remand and Memorandum in Support Thereof, filed March 23,-2016 (Doc. 8)(“Motion”). The Court held a hearing on July 11, 2016. The primary issue is whether the Court should remand the case pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1447(c) for, lack of subject matter jurisdiction, b

ORDER GRANTING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT [749, 750, 763]; DENYING MOTIONS TO JOIN IN CO-DEFENDANTS’ MOTIONS [757, 764, 769]; GRANTING IN PART PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PARTIAL SUMMARY JUDGMENT [762] David O. Carter, United States District Judge I. INTRO Before the Court are the Bird Marella Defendants’ Motion for Summary Judgment (Dkt. 749); the Former Employee Defe

137 Nev., Advance Opinion 4, IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF NEVADA TEVA PARENTERAL MEDICINES, No. 81024 INC., F/K/A SICOR, INC.; BAXTER HEALTHCARE CORPORATION; AND MCKESSON MEDICAL-SURGICAL, INC., Petitioners, FILED vs. THE EIGHT

21-833-cv Roberts v. Genting UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT August Term 2021 (Argued: May 11, 2022 Decided: May 15, 2023) Docket No. 21-833-cv GERALD ROBERTS, STEPHEN JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER MCLEOD, DAVID SHAW, ANITA JOHNSON, CHRISTOPHER HUMPHRIES, JEFFREY WILKINS, LATANYA MARTIN-RICE, LAURA SANCHEZ, LUCY MUNOZ

25 Cal.Rptr.3d 39 (2005) 126 Cal.App.4th 1073 John ERICKSON et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-complainants and Appellants, v. R.E.M. CONCEPTS, INC., Defendant, Cross-defendant and Respondent. No. D043620. Court of Appeal, Fourth District, Division One. February 2, 2005. As Modified February 14, 2005. *40

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA JASON M. BREEZEE, et al., Plaintiffs, Civil Action No. 23-3392 (BAH) v. Judge Beryl A. Howell ISLAMIC REPUBLIC OF IRAN, Defendant. MEMORANDUM OPINION

GREGORY, Circuit Judge, concurring in the judgment: I join the per curiam opinion reversing and remanding the district court’s decision because “al-Marri has not been afforded sufficient process to challenge his designation as an enemy combatant.” (Per Cu-*277riam Op. at 216). Further, I join in Judge Motz’s concurrence. While I respect the opinions

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT; No. 18-17274 AL OTRO LADO; INNOVATION LAW 18-17436 LAB; CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4:18-cv-06810- JST v. DONALD J. TRUMP, President of the OPINION United States; WILLIAM P. BARR, Attorney Genera

685 F.Supp.2d 186 (2010) In re PHARMACEUTICAL INDUSTRY AVERAGE WHOLESALE PRICE LITIGATION. This Document Relates to: The City of New York, et al., Plaintiffs, v. Abbott Laboratories, et al., Defendants. Civil Action No. 01-12257-PBS. MDL No. 1456. Subcategory Case No. 03-10643-PBS. United States District Court, D. Massachusetts. February 9, 2010.

14‐1963(L) Kirschenbaum, et al. v. 650 Fifth Avenue and Related Properties UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE SECOND CIRCUIT ______________ August Term 2015 (Argued: November 18, 2015 Decided: July 20, 2016)

FOR PUBLICATION UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT EAST BAY SANCTUARY COVENANT; Nos. 18-17274 AL OTRO LADO; INNOVATION LAW 18-17436 LAB; CENTRAL AMERICAN RESOURCE CENTER, D.C. No. Plaintiffs-Appellees, 4:18-cv-06810- JST v. JOSEPH R. BIDEN, President of the ORDER AND United States; MERRICK B. AME