⚖ SoapBox law
CasesDocketsStatutesRegulationsJudgesLawyersFile a complaintOversightDataLibrary

Cases

Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.

12 opinions for “Maria Elenes”

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990-11-20 · Published · cited 0× · 919 F.2d 146; 1990 WL 183695
919 F.2d 146 U.S.v.Gonzalez (Maria Elene) NO. 89-30338 United States Court of Appeals,Ninth Circuit. NOV 20, 1990 1 Appeal From: D.Or. 2 AFFIRMED.
District Court, W.D. Pennsylvania · 2017-03-28 · Published · cited 7× · 247 F. Supp. 3d 650; 2017 WL 1162912; 2017 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 45121
OPINION Mark R. Hornak, United States District Judge Before the Court is Plaintiff Angelica Davila’s Motion for Reconsideration in No. 14-cv-70, ECF No. 16.1 Ms. Davila filed this suit against the United States under the Federal Tort Claims Act (FTCA), 28 U.S.C. §§ 1346, 2671, et seq., following a traffic stop, which she asserts was predicated upon her Hispanic heritage
California Court of Appeal · 1996-07-11 · Published · cited 59× · 47 Cal. App. 4th 334; 54 Cal. Rptr. 2d 772; 96 Daily Journal DAR 8373; 96 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 5221; 1996 Cal. App. LEXIS 666
47 Cal.App.4th 334 (1996) SABRINA MARTINEZ et al., Plaintiffs and Appellants, v. COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES et al., Defendants and Respondents. Docket No. B088915. Court of Appeals of California, Second District, Division Five. July 11, 1996. *338 COUNSEL Moreno, Becerra & Guerrero, Danilo J. Becerra and Arnoldo Casillas fo
California Court of Appeal · 2020-07-15 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 7/15/20 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GERAWAN FARMING, INC., F077033 Petitioner, (44 ALRB No. 1, v. 2012-CE-041-VIS,
People v. Ortizpublic domain
California Court of Appeal · 1995-09-18 · Published · cited 58× · 38 Cal. App. 4th 377; 44 Cal. Rptr. 2d 914; 95 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 7364; 95 Daily Journal DAR 12537; 1995 Cal. App. LEXIS 897
* Pursuant to California Rules of Court, rules 976(b) and 976.1, this opinion is certified for publication with the exception of part I. [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 379 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE CO
California Court of Appeal · 2006-12-14 · Published · cited 84× · 52 Cal. Rptr. 3d 376; 145 Cal. App. 4th 790; 2006 Cal. Daily Op. Serv. 11380; 30 A.L.R. 6th 639; 2006 Daily Journal DAR 16191; 2006 Cal. App. LEXIS 1937
[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 792 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] *Page 793 [EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 0× · 113 A.D.3d 1020; 979 N.Y.2d 548
Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2014-01-30 · Published · cited 2× · 113 A.D.3d 1020; 979 N.Y.2d 548
Per Curiam. *1021The moving papers indicate that despite written notices sent to them by the Office of Court Administration at their last known address, respondents have failed to register and pay the required fee. Judiciary Law § 468-a (5) provides that noncompliance with the statute and rules regarding attorney registration “shall constitute conduc
California Court of Appeal · 2018-05-30 · Published · cited 0×
Filed 5/30/18 CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA FIFTH APPELLATE DISTRICT GERAWAN FARMING, INC., F073720 Petitioner, (42 ALRB No. 1) v. OPINION AGRICULTURAL LA
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2021-11-04 · Published · cited 0×
Reversed and Remanded and Memorandum Opinion filed November 4, 2021. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court
California Court of Appeal, 5th District · 2018-05-30 · Published · cited 13× · 234 Cal. Rptr. 3d 88; 23 Cal. App. 5th 1129
LEVY, J. *1140This case involves the intersection of two of the fundamental purposes of the Agricultural Labor Relations Act ( Labor Code, 1 § 1140 et seq.; the ALRA): one is the policy to provide agricultural workers with the right to choose in questions of labor representation through a secret ballot election process (§§ 1140.2, 1152, 115
Texas Court of Appeals, 14th District (Houston) · 2018-12-21 · Published · cited 1× · 566 S.W.3d 410
Reversed and Remanded and Opinion filed December 21, 2018. In The Fourteenth Court of Appeals NO. 14-17-00223-CV REBECCA WILSON, ET AL., Appellants1 V. GEORGE FLEMING AND FLEMING & ASSOCIATES, L.L.P., Appellees On Appeal from the 189th District Court Harr