Cases
Search U.S. court opinions (CourtListener / Free Law Project), or resolve a reporter citation to its case via the Caselaw Access Project. Facts only — name, court, date, status, citation count. Never a holding-summary.
20 opinions for “Maria Lugo”
Lugo-Martinez v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** Maria Lugo-Martinez,’ a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions pro se for review *995of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order summarily affirming an immigration judge’s (“IJ”) order denying her application for cancellation of removal. We dismiss the petition for review. We lack jurisdiction to review th
Lugo v. Holderpublic domain
*120 CALABRESI, Circuit Judge: I. FACTUAL BACKGROUND Maria C. Lugo is a citizen of Venezuela who came to the United States in 1996 on a nonimmigrant B-2 visa, and remained beyond the authorized period. In 2005, Ms. Lugo was charged with concealing a felony. This charge stemmed from
Lugo v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM **** We lack jurisdiction to review Gutierrez-Lugo’s challenge to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) discretionary determination that he failed to show his removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his United States citizen children. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003). The additional evidence presented by Gutierrez-L
Lugo v. Holderpublic domain
MEMORANDUM **** We lack jurisdiction to review Gutierrez-Lugo’s challenge to the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) discretionary determination that he failed to show his removal would result in exceptional and extremely unusual hardship to his United States citizen children. See Romero-Torres v. Ashcroft, 327 F.3d 887, 890 (9th Cir.2003). The additional evidence presented by Gutierrez-L
Lugo v. Gonzalespublic domain
MEMORANDUM ** *638Ubaldo Ruben Gutierrez Lugo, his wife Maria de Los Angeles Ortiz de Gutierrez and their son, Giovanni Gutierrez Ortiz, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order dismissing their appeal from an immigration judge’s decision denying their applications for cancellation
Lugo de Vega v. Sheltonpublic domain
Valentina Lugo de Vega, the widow of Sylvestre Vega, and Sylvestre Vega, Jr., Valeria Maria Vega, Jesus Eduardo Vega Lugo, and Matthew Luke Vega Lugo, the children of Sylvestre Vega (collectively, "the plaintiffs"), petition this Court for a writ of mandamus directing the Jefferson Circuit Court to vacate its order transferring the plaintiffs' claims against Tom Shelton, James Shelton, and Jay Electric Company, Inc., to Tuscaloosa County (no. 1091491). Defendants John Wilson and Wilso
Perez-Lugo v. Grupo Hima-San Pablo, Inc.public domain
ORDER JUAN M. PEREZ-GIMENEZ, Senior District Judge. On July 10, 2012, the court granted the plaintiffs request for production of documents (hospital protocols) but denied without prejudice her request for sanctions against co-defendant Grupo HIMA—San Pablo, Inc. (hereinafter “the Hospital”). See Docket No. 55. After the Hospital’s failure to comply with this court’s order to produce, o
Aldarondo-Lugo v. Santiago-Díazpublic domain
(2008) Maria ALDARONDO-LUGO, et al., Plaintiffs v. Mayor Victor J. SANTIAGO-DIAZ, et al., Defendants/Third-Party Plaintiffs v. Victor Soto, et al., Third-Party Defendants. Civil No. 02-1123 (JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. March 12, 2008. OPINION AND ORDER JAIME PIERAS, JR., Senior District Judge. Before the
Kelly v. Lugopublic domain
JjEDWARD A. DUFRESNE, JR., Chief Judge. This is an appeal by Leroy Kelly, Ernest Smith and Dewight Murray, plaintiffs-appellants, from a judgment dismissing their claims for damages against Jamie Lugo and Allstate Insurance Co., defendants-appellees, in this automobile accident suit. Because the record discloses no legal or manifest factual error on the part of the trial judge, we affirm. The basic facts
Lugo v. Dixon Tom-A-Toe Companies, Inc.public domain
ORDER PER CURIAM. Maria Lugo appeals the decision by the Labor & Industrial Relations Commission which found that Lugo suffered a twenty-two percent (22%) permanent partial disability as a result of an accident at work. Judgment affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).
Sistemas Urbanos, Inc. v. Lugo Ramospublic domain
368 F.Supp.2d 160 (2005) SISTEMAS URBANOS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Angelino LUGO RAMOS, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 03-1653(JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. May 9, 2005. *161 Ruben T. Nigaglioni, Ruben T. Nigaglioni Law Offices, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiffs. Ana M. Margarida-Julia, Jo-Ann Estades-
Sistemas Urbanos, Inc. v. Lugo Ramospublic domain
413 F.Supp.2d 96 (2006) SISTEMAS URBANOS, INC., et al., Plaintiffs, v. Angelino LUGO RAMOS, et al., Defendants. Civil No. 03-1653 (JAG). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. February 9, 2006. *97 *98 Ruben T. Nigaglioni, Ruben T. Nigaglioni Law Offices, Rafael J. Martinez Garcia, Niga
Aldarondo Lugo v. Municipality of Toa Bajapublic domain
329 F.Supp.2d 234 (2004) Maria ALDARONDO LUGO, et al., Plaintiffs v. MUNICIPALITY OF TOA BAJA, et al., Defendants No. CIV. 02-1123(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 6, 2004. *235 Andres Guillemard-Noble, Nachman & Guillemard, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Jorge Martinez-Luciano, Pedro Ortiz Alvar
Serra-Lugo v. Consortium-Las Mariaspublic domain
PER CURIAM. Hector Serra-Lugo appeals from the dismissal of his civil rights suit, claiming political discrimination and harassment, brought against the municipality of Maya-guez and certain municipal employees. The action was filed on April 14, 2000. The district court issued an order on July 20, 2000 which scheduled the initial scheduling conference and required the filing of a
Carlos Jimenez Lugo v. Maria Reyes Ramirezpublic domain
CC-97-570 1 En el Tribunal Supremo de Puerto Rico Carlos Jiménez Lugo Recurrido Certiorari Vs. 98TSPR123 María Reyes Ramírez Peticionaria Número del Caso: CC-97-570 Abogado Parte Peticionaria: Lcdo. Raymond L. Sánchez Maceira Abogado Parte Recurrida: Lcdo. Wilfredo R. P
Aldarondo-Lugo v. Municipality of Toa Bajapublic domain
329 F.Supp.2d 221 (2004) Maria ALDARONDO LUGO, et al., Plaintiffs v. MUNICIPALITY OF TOA BAJA, et al., Defendants No. CIV. 02-1123(JP). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. August 2, 2004. *222 Andres Guillemard-Noble, Esq., Nachman & Guillemard, San Juan, PR, for Plaintiff. Jorge Martinez-Luciano, Pedro Ortiz
Lugo v. Corsopublic domain
Lugo v Corso (2023 NY Slip Op 02115) Lugo v Corso 2023 NY Slip Op 02115 Decided on April 26, 2023 Appellate Division, Second Department Published by New York State Law Reporting Bureau pursuant to Judiciary Law § 431.
Daniel Lugo v. State of Floridapublic domain
Third District Court of Appeal State of Florida Opinion filed December 20, 2024. Not final until disposition of timely filed motion for rehearing. ________________ No. 3D24-2128 Lower Tribunal No. F95-17381-C ________________ Daniel Lugo, Petitioner,
United States v. Santiago-Lugopublic domain
904 F.Supp. 43 (1995) UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff, v. Israel SANTIAGO-LUGO (1), et al., Defendants. Crim. No. 95-029(JAF). United States District Court, D. Puerto Rico. September 29, 1995. *44 Bruce A. Pagel, Special Litigation Counsel Francisco Rebollo-Casalduc, Trial Attorney Guillermo Gil, U.S. Attorney, District of Pu
Lugo v. City of Charlottepublic domain
577 F.Supp. 988 (1984) Maria J. (Collins) LUGO, Plaintiff, v. The CITY OF CHARLOTTE, Defendant. No. C-C-83-615-M. United States District Court, W.D. North Carolina, Charlotte Division. January 20, 1984. Maria J. Lugo, pro se. F. Douglas Canty, Asst. City Atty., Charlotte, N.C., for defendant. ORDER McMILLAN, District Judge. On A