Cases

MEMORANDUM ** Juan Alfredo Torres Zepeda, and his wife, Maria Teresa Torres Hernandez, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying their motion to reopen removal proceedings. To the extent we have jurisdiction, it is conferred by 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review the denial of a motion to reopen for abuse of discretion. Ordonez v. INS, </

MEMORANDUM ** Maria Zepeda-Areas (“Zepeda”), a native and citizen of Nicaragua, petitions for review of a final order issued by the Board of Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of asylum, withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). We deny the petition. DISCUSSION Zepeda was required to estab

MEMORANDUM ** Maria Lourdes Zepeda-Diaz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

MEMORANDUM ** Maria Lourdes Zepeda-Diaz, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying her motion to reopen. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen. Iturribarria v. INS, 321 F.3d 889, 894 (9th Cir.2003). We deny the petition for review.

FOR PUBLICATION ATTORNEY FOR APPELLANT: ATTORNEY FOR APPELLEE: MATTHEW S. WILLIAMS MARK C. CHAMBERS Fort Wayne, Indiana Haller & Colvin, P.C. Fort Wayne, Indiana Apr 23 2014, 10:12 am IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF INDIANA IN RE THE MARRIAGE OF: ) JOSE DE JESUS CARRILLO PEREZ and

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Maria Elvia Zepeda-Carlon raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

PER CURIAM: * Appealing the Judgment in a Criminal Case, Maria Elvia Zepeda-Carlon raises arguments that are foreclosed by Almendarez-Torres v. United States, 523 U.S. 224, 235, 118 S.Ct. 1219, 140 L.Ed.2d 350 (1998), which held that a prior conviction is a sentencing factor under 8 U.S.C. § 1326(b)(2) and not a separate criminal offense. The Government’s motion for summary affirmance is

GRABER, Circuit Judge: Defendants Mario Silva, Jorge Zepeda-Medrano, and Alejandro Aguilar-Espinoza challenge their convictions. They contend that the district court erred in denying their motions to suppress evidence gathered by police during an investigation of a conspiracy to manufacture and distribute methamphetamine. For the reasons dis

Opinion issued April 4, 2013 In The Court of Appeals For The First District of Texas ———————————— NO. 01-11-00094-CR ——————————— FERMIN ZEPEDA, JR., Appellant V. THE STATE OF TEXAS, App

MEMORANDUM ** Remigio Zepeda Carrera and his wife Maria del Carmen Zepeda, natives and citizens of Mexico, petition pro se for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ summary dismissal of their appeal of an immigration judge’s denial of their applications for cancellation of removal. We have jurisdiction pursuant to 8 U.S.C. § 1252. Petitioners contend that the Board erred in summar

NORRIS, Circuit Judge, concurring in part and dissenting in part. I dissent from Part V of the court’s opinion in two respects: (1) I dissent as to that part of Part V reversing the portion of the injunction prohibiting INS agents from approaching plaintiffs’ homes during the nighttime hours to question, search or arrest them absent exigent circumstances and probable cau

753 F.2d 719 40 Fed.R.Serv.2d 1285 Virginia ZEPEDA, Yolanda Gamboa, Guillermo Olvera, MariaJosefa Botello, Ramon Munoz, Domingo Zepeda,Rafael Pastor, Joe Paz, David LouraTapia and Paz Raul Flores,Plaintiffs-Appellees,v.UNITED STATES IMMIGRATION AND NATURALIZATION SERVICE, DavidCrosland, Edward O'Connor, Joe Howerton and PhilipSmith, Defendants-Appellants. No. 80-

MARIA SERRANO, ELIA MAGANA, LUIS SILVA, REHTSE VARGAS, AND RUBEN ZEPEDA have requested leave to sue in quo warranto upon the following question: Are Rick Diaz, Ben Guitron, Juventino Cardona, Pamper Rodriguez, Vicente Ortega, Cruz Cervantes, and Javier Hernandez lawfully serving as directors of the Indio Housing Development Corporation? CONCLUSION Whether Rick Diaz, Ben Guitron, Juventino Cardona, Pamper Rodriguez, Vicente Ortega,

OPINION MAY, Judge. Maria Guadalupe Vidrios Zepeda appeals the division of the marital estate in her dissolution proceeding. She alleges the trial court abused its discretion when it awarded her only 2.5% of her ex-husband’s lottery winnings. We affirm. FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY Maria married Jose De Jesus Carrillo Perez on February 7, 2002, and they lived t

DAVID R. THOMPSON, Circuit Judge: Lorenzo Maria-Gonzalez pleaded guilty to being a deported alien found in the United States, in violation of 8 U.S.C. § 1326 (1994 Supp. V). The district court sentenced him to 63 months’ imprisonment, followed by 24 months’ supervised release. Maria-Gonzalez appeals his sentence. He argues that the district court erred in classifying his prior c

MEMORANDUM OPINION No. 04-11-00439-CV Maria TORRES, as Next Friend of Dareion Torres, Appellant v. DILLEY YOUTH ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION and Little League Baseball, Inc., et al., Appellees From the 218th Judicial District Court, Frio County, Texas

ORDER & MEMORANDUM*** This court’s memorandum disposition, filed December 17, 2003, is hereby withdrawn and replaced with the following: Petitioners seek review of the Immigration Judge’s (IJ) determination that they did not meet the requirements for extreme hardship under the former INA § 244(a)(1) and thus did not warrant suspension of deportation. Because we lack jurisdiction to

RAWLINSON, Circuit Judge, concurring in part, and dissenting in part: I would pose the issue in this case as whether it was clearly established law that a warrantless entry predicated on a perceived emergency violates the Fourth Amendment despite the lack of probable cause. In my view, that point of law was not clearly established, and should result in our affirming the grant of

FOR PUBLICATION FILED UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FEB 10 2023 MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK U.S. COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT CRISTA RAMOS; CRISTINA MORALES; No. 18-16981 BENJAMIN ZEPEDA; ORLANDO ZEPEDA; JUAN EDUA

Plaintiff, Gregorio P. Zepeda, Jr., seeks reversal of a judgment, following a nonjury trial, denying him recovery for the death of his minor child under a family life insurance policy issued by defendant, American National Insurance Company. Plaintiff purchased the insurance in question from defendant on November 8, 1965. At that time plaintiff was married to Maria Elena Zepeda. The policy named plaintiff as 'the insured,' and named his then wife, Maria Elena, as 'insured spous